History on a Monday
Seminar Series for Postgraduates and Faculty
Held at 12.10-1.30
in Woolley Common Room, Woolley Building A22
(Enter Woolley through the entrance on Science Road and climb the stairs in front of you. Turn left down the corridor, and the WCR is the door at the end of the hall)
Click here for map
Dr Sarah Walsh and Peter Hobbins
Click here to email
The semester at a glance
Semester 1, 2015
|9 March||Tamson Pietsch, James Drown, David Garner||Panel: historical geography and spatiality|
|16 March||Jude Philp||The Animal Parts of Objects: History in Museums|
|23 March||Janet Golden||Babies Made Us Modern|
|30 March||Jon Lawrence
||Reconstructing the politics of everyday life, 1945-1990|
|6 April||Mid-semester break||No session|
|13 April||Kimberley Knight||Droplets of heaven: tear relics in the high middle ages|
|On Stalin’s team: the years of living dangerously in Soviet politics|
|27 April||Vanessa Heggie||Manliness, amateurism and the British climber in the Himalaya: real men, real mountains?|
|4 May||Cincy McCreery||Remembering Prince Alfred and the voyages of HMS Galatea (1867–71)|
|11 May||Glenda Sluga and colleagues||What's new in inernational history?|
|18 May||Vannessa Hearman||Indonesia and accounting for the 1965–66 anti-communist killings|
|25 May||Alecia Simmonds, Jamie Dunk,
|Panel: the case in historical methodology|
|1 June||Iain McCalman,
|Spotlight:Sydney Environment Institute|
Semester 2, 2015
|3 August||Alecia Simmonds, Jamie Dunk||Panel: The case in historical methodology|
|17 August||Sarah Dunstan, Chris Maxworthy||Postgraduate projects and prospects in History|
|24 August||Judith Keene||TBA|
|31 August||Simon Ville, Sophie Loy-Wilson, Chin Jou||Panel: Economics and history|
|7 September||Gary Werskey, Anita Callaway||The "Australia" Australians saw in the Heidelberg era: revisiting the art of AH Fullwood|
|14 September||Penny Russell, Ben Mercer, Heather Garnsey||Panel: Digital genealogy and individual lives
|21 September||Tamson Pietsch||The floating university|
|28 September||Mid-semester break
|5 October||Labor Day holiday
|12 October||James Curran||TBA|
|26 October||David Hunt||Girt
The Animal Parts of Objects: History in Museums
Dr. Jude Philp,
Senior Curator of Macleay Museum
Between 1870 and 1890, anthropologists, explorers, missionaries, traders, and government officers pursued the fauna of southeast coastal Papua New Guinea. In doing so, they also collected objects made by the people they encountered. Thousands of animal skins were sold and donated to museums along with such objects. Within the museum, however, the relationship between animal and object was severed. Frequently museum processes also led to a slow displacement between collector-information and museum item. In this paper, I examine the kinds of information museums maintained. I am particularly concerned with the ways museum systems of categorization created ‘natural’ and ‘unnatural’ objects.
Modern American Babies
Dr Janet Golden,
Professor of History at Rutgers University
Janet will present a brief overview of her book: Babies Made Us Modern, which analyses the dramatic transformations in the lives of babies resulting from ongoing changes in American life in the domains of medicine, the marketplace, politics, demography, family life and popular culture. After that, she’ll discuss the paradoxical “value” of babies in the early twentieth century, when people paid to see them in incubators and paid to give them away.
Indonesia and accounting for the 1965–66 anti-communist killings
This year marks the 50th anniversary of the 1965-66 anti-communist violence in Indonesia in which half a million people were killed. Since the fall of the authoritarian Suharto regime in 1998, Indonesia has done little to account for the anti-communist violence, despite demands from survivors and human rights organisations. This paper examines those groups' efforts in the last years of the Yudhoyono administration (2012-2014) to push the government to act and the extent to which these efforts signal abandonment of the central government, in preference for local grassroots initiatives. These local initiative however are informed by global activism on human rights. In the context of Indonesia, what are tensions between local initiatives and these global discourses?
Remembering Prince Alfred and the voyages of HMS Galatea (1867–71)
In 1867, Prince Alfred Ernest Albert, Duke of Edinburgh and the second son of Queen Victoria, embarked on the first global royal tour. For the next five years Alfred, an officer in the Royal Navy and Captain of HMS Galatea, visited Britain’s major settler colonies in the Southern Hemisphere (Australia, New Zealand, the Cape of Good Hope), the important crown colonies of India, Ceylon and Hong Kong, the empires of China and Japan, as well as a diverse range of key port cities and islands across the globe, from Manila to Mauritius. More British subjects (and non-subjects) saw Alfred than any other member of the British Royal family before the twentieth century, and his attempted assassination in Sydney in 1868 sent shock waves around the empire. Yet Alfred’s voyages aboard HMS Galatea have been largely forgotten. This paper provides an overview of these voyages, argues for their historical significance and considers why they have received scant historical attention. The paper pays particular attention to the material culture created in response to the voyages and will be accompanied by a PowerPoint presentation.
Psychiatric case histories as objects of psychiatric knowledge
Psychiatrists frame their expertise around evidence that has – for most of the field's history – been collated in psychiatric texts, presented as case histories. Such case histories are often standardised; they are presented to the community as evidence for a psychiatric classification, or a variation from or within such a classification, or as the exemplary way to use a particular psychiatric technique in the treatment of the patient, etc. Sometimes psychiatric cases are the basis of legal judgements, and in these instances we can see the interaction of two very powerful social institutions, as the individual is framed both legally and psychiatrically. In all typical cases, the patient does not have much of a voice - although occasionally their voices can be located.
Using examples from the history of psychiatry, this paper sketches some of the sociological ways of looking at the practices surrounding psychiatric case histories, and reflects on how these can be used to better understand how psychiatry was employed to control the mentally ill. It suggests that it is not best historical practice to simply read the 'surfaces' of case histories in psychiatric texts as windows into the past lives of the mentally ill or psychiatrically stigmatized. Rather, focusing on the practices that surround these objects (in their selection, negotiation, interpretation, etc.) allows for a more nuanced understanding of the role of case history in the history of psychiatry.
The Case in Historical Methodology: a Legal Historian’s Perspective
For the lawyer and the law student, legal cases lie at the heart of what they do on a daily basis. They provide both the substance and form of legal work and legal knowledge. For the historian, however, they offer something different, and for the legal historian something else again. In this talk I start by considering “what is a legal case?” and set out some of the key things that lawyers do with, or want from, cases. Drawing on my own work, I will then go on to compare this with what historians (legal and otherwise) want from cases, and finish by considering some of the potential pitfalls and problems to watch out for when making use of them as an historical source.
'Feigned Madness and Historical Methodology'
In this paper I make an episode of feigned madness serve as five ‘cases’ of, in turn, poor sentencing, poor government, poor judgment, lay diagnosis, and colonial disorder. The cases made of madness in penal New South Wales show that governors, magistrates, and doctors were both more and less than they were supposed to be, and that the executive and legal structures of the colony were in shambles.