Current Department Seminar Series

Monday 20 October 2014 - 4 - 6 pm
Speakers: Ruvitca Andrijasevic
Topic: The Figure of the Trafficked Victim: Gender, Rights and Representation

During the last two decades, critical scholars in gender, migration and post-colonial studies have been engaged in attempting to dislodge the figure of the sex trafficking victim from its position of primacy in public, policy and academic debates. The body of work that stresses the agency and rights of migrant women in the sex sector has put forward a convincing critique of the passive and enslaved trafficking victim and has replaced the latter with the figures of the active migrant and the political protagonist.

Despite such a shift, however, the figure of the trafficking victim continues to dominate public and policy arenas. In this chapter, I am interested in the persistence of the figure of the victim and suggest that that the figure of the victim is not a ‘free-floating’ but rather produced through specific codes and conventions.

These issues, I argue, become visible by bringing to the fore the nexus among sexuality, gender and narrative. By building on feminist scholarship on sexuality and represen- tation in film, visual media studies and historical studies of East/West Europe, I explore the ways in which representa- tions are embedded within narrative tropes and discursive constructions about women’s sexuality that are culturally and historically specific.

Click here to download the flyer

About the Speakers: Dr Rutvica AndrijasevicDr Rutvica Andrijasevic, University of Leicester

Rutvica Andrijasevic works at the School of Management, University of Leicester. Her areas of expertise are gender and work, migration, and citizenship, and her work has addressed how contemporary forms of mobility and labor, such a-s “illegality” and “trafficking,” problematize the relationship between free waged labor, rights, and citizenship. She is the author of Agency, Migration and Citizenship in Sex Trafficking (Palgrave, 2010) and a member of the editorial collective Feminist Review.

Venue: Room 140 RC Mills building, A26 [map]

Past Seminar

Monday 17 March 2014 - 2 - 4pm
Speakers: Karen Dion
Topic: Ethnic Identity in a Multicultural Society

At the societal level, within Canada, there is considerable structural support acknowledging individuals’ diverse ethnic ancestral origins.

As a social psychologist, I am interested in the extent to which ethnic ancestries contribute to self-definition at the personal level and the factors contributing to the likelihood that individuals include their ethnocultural background in their sense of their own identity.

In my presentation, I’ll discuss findings from survey data which address these issues as well as consider questions for future research raised by these findings

Click here to download the flyer

About the Speakers: Prof. Karen DionProfessor Karen Dion, UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

Professor Karen Dion is Professor of Psychology at the University of Toronto on the Scarborough campus, located in the eastern part of Toronto.

In addition to the issues she will discuss in the seminar, she is currently interested in bicultural identity among second immigrant generation young adults, the role of gender in negotiating bicultural identity and the meaning of ethnocultural identities among second generation youth.

She is a co-author (J.G. Reitz, R. Breton, K.Kisiel Dion and K.L. Dion) of a recent book, Multiculturalism and Social Cohesion: Potentials and Challenges of Diversity, published by Springer in 2009, in which she and graduate student Mai Phan examined this issue using Canadian survey data (the Ethnic Diversity Survey).

Another current research interest is the relation between group identities and personal relationships among individuals from different social groups.

Venue: Room 148 RC Mills building, A26 [map]

Monday 31 March 2014 - 2 - 4pm
Speakers: Parvathi Raghuram
Topic: Migration and Development in The Age of Rising Powers:
Theoretical & Empirical Opportunities

While there has been considerable interest in the implications of the Rising Powers for a variety of disciplines and issues the impact on migration has been less well analysed. However, it is clear that there have been changes to migration – some new patterns have emerged, others have intensified or changed its nature and still others have declined. However, the theoretical challenges of these changes have not yet been explored.

This paper addresses this gap. It outlines the theoretical legacies through which migration in the age of Rising Powers may be conceptualised. As most of the countries that are currently seen to be Rising are classified as part of the global South and considered under the broad rubric of development, this paper will particularly focus on the challenge to migration and development thinking posed by the Rising Powers.

How do we insert the impact of these global shifts into theories of migration that have often implicitly or explicitly adopted a binary (North/South) view of the world? What do these shifts mean for countries like Australia that are seen as part of the global North, but whose alignments are rapidly changing away from longstanding colonial relations towards these Rising Powers?

The paper ends by offering a series of empirical and analytical questions that emerge because of the contemporary ‘global rebalancing’.

Click here to download the flyer

About the Speakers: Dr Parvathi RagharamDr Parvathi Ragharam, OPEN UNIVERSITY, UK

Dr Parvathi Ragharam is Reader in Geography at the Open University. She has published widely on gender, migration and development. Her recent interest focuses on the challenge of ‘Rising Asia’ for postcolonial theory and development studies.

She has co-authored The Practice of Cultural Studies (Sage) and co-edited South Asian Women in the Diaspora (Berg) and Tracing Indian diaspora: Contexts, Memories, Representations(Sage).

She co-edits the journal South Asian Diaspora (Sage) and the book series Mobility and Politics (Palgrave). Her journal publications include articles in Population, Space & Place, Social Politics, Sociology of Health & Illness, and Sociology

Venue: Room 148 RC Mills building, A26 [map]

Monday 28 April 2014 - 2 - 4pm
Speakers: Hannah Lewis
Topic: Conceptualising Hyper-Precarious Migrant Lives: From Forced Labour To Unfreedom

Drawing on the ESRC-funded study 'Precarious lives: experiences of forced/unfree labour among refugees and asylum seekers', this presentation will critique the International Labour Organisation’s approach to defining and tackling forced labour and argue that discussing such phenomena in rigid binaries (such as free/forced) is unhelpful.

Instead, processes in migrant labour experiences will be highlighted and a continuum approach built around the concept of ‘unfreedom’ is suggested as the best way to ensure that the diversity of migrants’ experiences of forced labour are considered.

The ‘hyper-precarity trap’ is further discussed as an analytical device to show how welfare, work, race, rights, journeys, the economy and neoliberalism all come together to create the ‘demand’ and ‘supply’ of forced labour subjects and how they intersect to produce multidimensional insecurities.

Overall, this presentation will emphasise that to try to separate ‘slavery’, ‘trafficking’ or ‘forced labour’ as an exceptional event undermines an understanding of how exploitation is tied up with social, political and legal status, migration, gender and economic systems.

Click here to download the flyer

About the Speakers: Dr Hannah LewisDr Hannah Lewis, University of Leeds

Hannah Lewis is Critical Geography Research Fellow in the School of Geography, University of Leeds, UK with research interests in refugee community, immigration policy, contingent socialities, multiculturalism, and food.

Her recent ESRC project, ‘Precarious Lives’, is the first study of forced labour experiences among refugees and asylum seekers in the UK. The resulting book with Peter Dwyer, Stuart Hodkinson and Louise Waite, Precarious lives: forced labour, exploitation and asylum (Policy Press) is forthcoming. Dr Lewis’ research track-record spans academic, public policy and voluntary sector studies on ‘new’ migration, asylum seeker dispersal, the destitution of refused asylum seekers, and migrant and refugee integration, housing and volunteering.

Her recent publications include (2013) ‘’Multiculturalism is never talked about’, Policy & Politics (2011) ‘Status matters: forced labour and UK immigration policy', a Joseph Rowntree Foundation policy paper; and (2010) 'Community moments: integration and transnationalism at ‘refugee’ parties and events', Journal of Refugee Studies 23(4).

Venue: Room 148 RC Mills building, A26 [map]

Wednesday 30 April 2014 - 2 - 4pm
Speakers: Kurt Mills
Topic: Intervention, The International Criminal Court and Humanitarianism in Africa

Over the preceding decades, the international community has developed three sets of norms and practices to deal with situations of mass atrocities - humanitarianism, international criminal justice, and the use of military force - what has come to be known as the responsibility to protect.

A major question remains as to whether these responses form part of a coherent integrated whole, or whether the relationships between them are much more ambiguous and problematic.

This talk will argue the latter, exploring the perplexing conundrums and unintended consequences evident in the implementation of these norms and practices.

The focus will be on recent experiences in sub-Saharan Africa, and in particular the Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda.

Click here to download the flyer

About the Speakers: Dr Kurt MillsDr Kurt Mills, University of Glasgow

Dr Kurt Mills is Senior Lecturer in International Human Rights at the University of Glasgow, and the Convenor of the Glasgow Human Rights Network. He is also Vice-President-Elect of the International Studies Association, and was the founding chair of the human rights section of ISA.

Currently, he is a visiting scholar at the Asia-Pacific Centre for the Responsibility to Protect at the University of Queensland. He previously taught at Gettysburg College, James Madison University, Mount Holyoke College, and the American University in Cairo, and was Assistant Director of the Five College Program in Peace and Security Studies at Hampshire College. He received his undergraduate degree from Hampshire College, and his postgraduate degrees from the University of Notre Dame.

His work focuses on human rights and international organisations, with particular emphasis on the responsibility to protect, the International Criminal Court, and humanitarianism, and a regional focus on sub-Saharan Africa.

Venue: Room 440 Old Teachers' College building, A22 [map]

Monday 5 May 2014 - 2 - 4pm
Speakers: Rae Lesser Blumberg
Topic: The Magic Money Tree?
Women, Economic Power and Development in a Globalized World

Blumberg’s gender stratification and gender and development theories posit that women’s relative economic power – their control of income and other assets – is the most important although far from the only factor affecting their position.

This paper presents theory and a compilation of research concerning the outcomes of women’s economic empowerment vs. their economic disempowerment. Their economic empowerment is linked to a cornucopia of benefits from micro to macro levels. These range from greater gender equality to enhanced development, peace and well-being.

At the micro level, with greater economic power, women have more freedom of movement and say in household decisions, including their own fertility (which they overwhelmingly choose to curb). They also tend to spend income they control on children’s nutrition, health and education – human capital – more than counterpart men.

At the macro level, both decreased fertility and increased human capital are linked to greater national income growth and well-being. Economically disempowered women are more subjugated, have higher fertility and children with poorer nutrition, health and education. Their societies have more armed conflict and worse economic and well-being indicators.

Click here to download the flyer

About the Speakers: Prof Rae Lesser BlumbergProfessor Rae Lesser Blumberg, UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA

Professor Rae Lesser Blumbert is the William R. Kenan, Jr. Professor of Sociology at the University of Virginia. She received her Ph.D. from Northwestern in 1970 and joined the Sociology Department in 1998. She is also Professor Emerita of Sociology at the University of California, San Diego.

Her academic work revolves around two theories. Firstis a general theory of gender stratification found in such works as Stratification: Socioeconomic and Sexual Inequality (Wm. C Brown, 1978); "A General Theory of Gender Stratification" (Sociological Theory 1984); and Gender, Family, and Economy: The Triple Overlap (Sage 1991). The second is an evolving theory of gender and economic development as described in such works as "Making the Case for the Gender Variable: Women and the Wealth and Well-being of Nations (U.S.A.I.D. 1989) and EnGENDERing Wealth and Well-being: Empowerment for Global Change, edited by Blumberg, Cathy Rakowski, Irene Tinker and Michael Monteon (Westview, 1995). Largely in pursuit of her theories, she has worked in over 40 countries on every continent except Antarctica.

Venue: Room 148 RC Mills building, A26 [map]

Thursday 19 June 2014 - 4 - 6pm
Presented by: Department of Sociology and Social Policy and Department of Political Economy
Speakers: Charles Woolfson
Topic: The Great Recession in the Baltic States, Austerity Myths and the Wider Lessons of 'Internal Devaluation'

During the years of ‘the great recession’, the Baltic ‘Tiger’ economies of the mid-2000s experienced the most severe downturn not only in Europe, but globally.

Now with economic recovery in sight, this paper examines the myths of the new Baltic ‘success’ story that the imposition of radical austerity measures - so-called ‘internal devaluation - can be achieved with popular consent, and in a socially and economically ‘costless’ manner. Baltic-style austerity has become a template for the international financial community, the European Commission and more widely.

The paper argues that, contra the myths of ‘success’, austerity has had significant social and economic costs which undermine the longer-run sustainability of states which follow this path. Among these costs are significant increases in poverty, growing social, political and industrial ‘disenfranchisement’, labour market segmentation, as well as an unprecedented and continuing emigration of a new ‘austeriat’.

The paper offers a cautionary message to governments seeking to restore economic growth at the expense of labour in the aftermath of the crisis.

Click here to download the flyer

About the Speakers: Prof Charles WoolfsonProfessor Charles Woolfson, Linköping University

Charles Woolfson is Professor of Labour Studies in the Institute for Research on Migration, Ethnicity and Society (REMESO), Linköping University, Sweden.

Between 1999 and 2009 he was resident in the Baltic states, and was for three years (2004-2007) appointed by the European Commission as a Marie Curie Chair at the Univesity of Latvia. Together with Jeffrey Sommers, Charles is co-editor of The Contradictions of Austerity: The Socio-Economic Costs of the Neoliberal Baltic Model (Routledge, 2014).

Noam Comsky wrote about The Contradictions of Austerity: “This book promises to become the defining study on the impact of austerity in the Baltics, otherwise known as the ‘Baltic miracle’...heralded by partisans of neoliberal austerity as demonstrating the success of their economic therapy,..if this “miracle” counts as success, one would hate to imagine what failure might be. [T]he import of these incisive inquiries is also “a stark warning” to the European Union, and the world, as the neoliberal assault steadily demolishes the social model that was Europe’s great contribution to modern civilization.”

Venue: Room 398 Merewether building, H04 [map]

Monday 16 June 2014 - 2 - 4 pm
Speakers: Montri Kunphoommarl
Topic: People's Politics: Movements Towards Democratisation and Human Rights in Thailand

This paper aims to explore the concept of people’s politics and to apply it to the Thai democratic movement. Thailand has embarked on democratization since 1932, but the problems of inactive civil society participation, political conflict, and political consciousness among the general population are still clearly visible today. During 1932-1992, there were political conflicts between the military and the pro-democracy middle class; and another political conflict occurred between various governmental and anti-governmental factions between 1993 to the present.

Although Thailand is formally a democratic country, it still lacks political consciousness in terms of understanding the concept of democracy and democratic practices. The bottom-up democracy approach has been promoted under the Thai new constitution in 1997 which was called the “People’s Constitution” and also in 2007 by independent academic organizations such as the King Prajadhipok’s Institute (KPI) and the Political Development Council through the concepts of people’s politics in terms of deliberative democracy, civic education, and community democracy by which more people began to be actively involved in politics.

My study will focus on people’s politics in relation to the 1997 constitution and will review the roles of civil society by comparing the case of Thailand with the Australian experience.

Click here to download the flyer

About the Speakers: Dr Montri KunphoommarlDr Montri Kunphoommarl, Naresuan University, Thailand

Dr.Montri Kunphoommarl is an Assistant Professor of Social Development in the Department of Sociology and Anthropology at Faculty of Social Sciences, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok province and also chair of the People’s Politics Development Centre, King Prajadhipok’s Institute in Phitsanulok Province.

He has held visiting scholar and exchange research fellowships at various institutes, including Washington State University, Pullman USA; Chuo University, Tokyo, Japan; ICSSR, New Delhi, India and was recently a visiting scholar at Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.

His research interests focus on democratization, human rights, social movements, social development and social and community welfare. He obtained Ph.D. in Sociology from Michigan State University USA under the Fulbright Program. His teaching areas include social development administration, social development theory and planning, human rights movements and social impact assessment. For extension work in the People’s Politics Development Centre, he has trained civil society groups at grass root levels in Phitsanulok province on community democracy and civic education.

Venue: Room 140 RC Mills building, A26 [map]

Monday 28 July 2014 - 2 - 4 pm
Speakers: Ludger Pries
Topic: Refugees and Asylum - Seekers Knocking at the Doors of 'Castle Europe'?

With the Schengen Treaties, the border controls between European national states were re-duced and abolished. Coordinated control of EU (Schengen) states' external borders, including the new agency Frontex, was established. In relation to refugees and asylum-seekers, the so-called ‘third-country-norm’ was defined to determine that asylum applications have to be managed in that Schengen-country where the applicant first entered.

This system now faces severe challenges. Refugee movements towards Europe from Asia, Near East and Africa concentrate in the Mediterranean EU-/Schengen-countries that are shaped by economic crisis and structural problems. As part of the EU as ‘a space of law’, these countries are challenged to manage all applications of refugees and asylum seekers based on international, European and national law.

National and European institutions, as well as many politicians and NGOs, question the cur-rent situation. More than thousand persons annually die in the Mediterranean when trying to enter the EU, and asylum applications are often managed inefficiently. The burden and costs of the European asylum system are not distributed in a fair and balanced way between all member states.

Where and why do refugees at the Mediterranean EU-borders come from? How are they treated in Cyprus, Greece, Italy, Malta and Spain? How do local authorities confront the situ-ation? What are the proposals for improving refugees’ situation?

Click here to download the flyer

About the Speakers: Prof Dr Ludger PriesProf Dr Ludger Pries, Ruhr-Universität Bochum

Professor Ludger Pries is Chair of Sociology/Organisation, Migration, Participation in the Ruhr-Universität Bochum.

His fields of expertise include the Sociology of work, organizations and migration in a comparative perspective, transnationalism and globalisation research. He has researched and taught in Germany, Spain, Mexico, Brazil and the USA.

Prof Pries has published 14 books (5 co-authored); more than 60 refereed journal articles; 18 edited books, of those 4 in English and 7 in Spanish; and almost 80 chapters in books. He reviews for almost 40 journals and foundations, and is active in the editorial boards of 5 academic journals, including associate editor of Global Networks.

Venue: Room 140 RC Mills building, A26 [map]

Tuesday 5 August 2014 - 2 - 4 pm
Speakers: Sriprapha Petcharamesree
Topic: Statelessness and Migration: The Case of The Rohingya

Stateless, discriminated against, treated unequally, excluded and persecuted, the Rohingya are one of the most vulnerable minorities in the world.

The persecution and exclusion has resulted in displacement and migration. Hundreds thousands of them left their own country where they were not recognised as citizens.

Deprived of the legal status and the enjoyment of rights, many of them decide to leave the country, searching for a better place just to be deceived and treated as “illegal” immigrants.

The talk will address the issues of statelessness of the Rohingya and its implications for migration. It will also offer an overview of the rights and plight of Rohingya in some specific countries in Southeast Asia, Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia in particular.

The talk will finally examine how ASEAN human rights bodies respond to the issues.

Click here to download the flyer

About the Speakers: Dr Sriprapha PetcharamesreeDr Sriprapha Petcharamesree, Mahidol University, Thailand

Dr Sriprapha Petcharamesree is currently a fujll-time faculty member at the Institue of Human Rights and Peace Studies Institute of Human Rights and Peace Studies, Mahidol University, Thailand. After obtaining her first degree in political science from Thammasat University, she furthered her studies in the same discipline and received her D.E.A. and then Ph.D. (Doctorat) in International Politics from the University of Paris-X Nanterre, France.

Her first formal contact with human rights works started when she worked at the UNICEF’s Emergency Operations for Cambodian Refugees. She joined Mahidol University in 1996 and got the very first human rights graduated program started in 1998. Since then, she has been active in the human rights field in the academic community and among human rights activists both at national and regional levels. She works closely with NGOs, grassroots people and some marginalized groups, ethnic minorities, migrant workers, asylum seekers, in particular.

Her recent research works focus mainly on issues of ASEAN and human rights, citizenship, statelessness, access to justice of the poor and non citizen, among others. From October 2009 to December 2012, she was serving as the Thai Representative to the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights.

Venue: Room 140 RC Mills building, A26 [map]

Monday 15 September 2014 - 2 - 4 pm
Speakers: Michael Humphrey
Topic: Amnesty Laws, Transitions and Restless Events:
Re/Burials and The Political Life of Victims

In the transitional justice field amnesty laws are rejected as a failure of accountability. Underlying this critique is the idea that law and human rights are transformative of states and society, an ‘unadulterated good’. Yet what amnesty laws signify is the tension between continuity and rupture in periods of transition, especially the persistence of configurations of power.

This paper explores the erosion and repeal of amnesty laws to develop a model of transitional justice as the perpetual management of ‘restless events’ through the processes of political semiosis. The transitional justice methodology is based on blaming and social reburial enacted through trials and truth commissions. In transitional justice, rituals events of large scale violence are constituted as a ‘sepulcher’ – in which missing/invisible victims are recovered through their social embodiment in the official narratives of transition. Transitional justice rituals of trials and truth commissions involve the disinterment and reburial of dead bodies – the emblematic ‘disappeared’.

The study of the erosion of amnesty laws reveals how judicialisation of conflict creates performative legal events, how reburial gives political life to the dead and how the idea of political and legal fixes – full stop laws, looking forward not backwards – in the long run are ‘restless events’. The paper draws on case studies of amnesty laws and impunity in Spain, Uruguay, Argentina and Lebanon.

Click here to download the flyer

About the Speakers: Prof Michael HumphreyProfessor Michael Humphrey, University of Sydney

Professor Michael Humphrey’s research interests have focused on large scale social change and the governability of social life. This has been strongly framed by the impact of globalization on the relationship and connections between societies in the North and South. The themes of his research have included international migration, refugees, multiculturalism, community, the city, war, terrorism, law, human rights and transnational governance.

The major areas of his research have been in 2 areas: ‘Islam in the West’ and ‘Political Violence and Social Healing’. His work on ‘Islam in the West’ has explored the changing character of Muslim cultural identity and citizenship in Western societies over the past 25 years. He has analysed the formation of Islam as an immigrant and minority religion in Western societies and showed how place of origin and identity have strongly shaped religious leadership, authority, the practice of Islamic law, organization and ethnic fragmentation.

His research on ‘Political Violence and Social Healing’ has explored the unmaking of societies by violence and thera- peutic forms of governance that have emerged to rehabilitate societies and recover state legitimacy and authority.

Venue: Room 140 RC Mills building, A26 [map]

Monday 29 September 2014 - 4 - 6 pm
Speakers: Brian Rappert & Chandré Gould
Topic: The Dis-Eases of Secrecy

It is well established that policy agendas define and construct what counts as a concern. How issues are identified as matters of concerns and how do they become formulated as problems in need of redress are key preoccupations across the social sciences. Yet, what remains outside of professional and policy agendas is equally an issue of importance. The overall aim of this presentation is to address the question: How can those concerned with the social implications of science and technology become more mindful about the implications they are not addressing?

Substantively, the presentation examines the historical erasure of the South African Apartheid era biological and chemical weapons programme. It will offer an account of the processes associated with limiting the regard for the programme within international diplomacy as well as by life scientists and professional science associations in South Africa. In relation to both, consideration will be given to how this offensive programme has been set aside within historical memory; a story that raises questions about the productive lures of secrecy and the ways in which attempts to reveal result in concealment to form a complex dynamic over time. A goal will be to ask how the recognition of such absences today through social analysis can be translated into analysis that is practically relevant.

Click here to download the flyer

About the Speakers: Prof Brian RappertProfessor Brian Rappert, University of Exeter

Brian Rappert is a Professor of Science, Technology and Public Affairs in the Department of Sociology and Philosophy at the University of Exeter. His long term interest has been the examination of the strategic management of information; particularly in the relation to armed conflict.

More recently he has been interested in the social, ethical, and epistemological issues associated with researching and writing about secrets, as in his book Experimental Secrets (2009) and How to Look Good in a War (2012).

Venue: Room 140 RC Mills building, A26 [map]