Principles of Assessment

Assessment practice at Sydney is recognised as central to our students' learning and achievement of unit and program/course learning outcomes. Assessment practices promote academic integrity and ethical behaviour for both students and staff.
The Assessment@Sydney Assessment Principles
apply at both unit and program/course level, individual and group assessment tasks:
- Program focus
Assessment strategies for each unit will include consideration of the assessment profile across the whole program to ensure that these skills/knowledge/attributes expressed in program learning outcomes are introduced, developed and mastered. - First year focus
Specific attention needs to be given to first year coursework (undergraduate and postgraduate) to induct students into the assessment practices and culture of higher education. - Leadership
Those responsible/accountable at program/year and unit coordination level have a vital leadership role to play in the design and implementation of assessment tasks and overall strategies.
Assessment Principle |
Attainment Level 1 |
Attainment Level 2 |
|---|---|---|
PRINCIPLE 1: ASSESSMENT PRACTICES MUST ADVANCE STUDENT LEARNING |
|
|
Assessment practices align with goals, context, learning activities and learning outcomes |
UoS outlines include evidence of the alignment. |
Students experience the alignment. |
A variety of assessment tasks are used, while ensuring that student and staff workloads are considered |
Program assessment tasks vary. Staff workload formulae include assessment loads. |
Program/year co-ordinator monitors/maps student assessment demands. |
Assessment tasks reflect increasing levels of complexity across a program and foster enquiry-based learning |
Descriptions of assessment tasks include an indication of complexity. |
Assessment task complexity increases with progress through the program. |
Constructive, timely and respectful feedback develops student skills of self and peer evaluation and guides the development of future student work |
Examples of constructive, timely and respectful feedback given are common. |
Students experience the feedback as constructive, timely and respectful. |
PRINCIPLE 2: ASSESSMENT PRACTICES MUST BE CLEARLY COMMUNICATED TO STUDENTS AND STAFF |
|
|
Unit of study outlines are available in the first week of offering and communicate the purposes, timing, weighting and extent of assessment in sufficient detail to allow students to plan their approach to assessment |
Communicative UoS outlines are available in the first week. |
Students experience UoS outlines as being useful in planning their assessment approach. |
Unit of study outlines explain the rationale for the selection of assessment tasks (e.g. group task) in relation to learning outcomes |
Rationale exists in UoS outline. |
Students experience assessment tasks as related to learning outcomes. |
Procedures exist to ensure that all staff involved in teaching of a unit share a common understanding of assessment practices |
Procedures exist to develop a common understanding. |
Staff have a common understanding. |
The process of marking and of combining individual task marks is explicitly explained in the unit outline |
Explanation is given in the UoS outline. |
Process is implemented as explained. |
PRINCIPLE 3: ASSESSMENT PRACTICES MUST BE VALID AND FAIR |
|
|
Assessment tasks are authentic and appropriate to disciplinary and/or professional context |
Peer review confirms authenticity and appropriateness. |
Students experience tasks as authentic and appropriate. |
Assessment incorporates rigorous academic standards related to the discipline(s) and is based on pre-determined, clearly articulated criteria that students actively engage with |
Program standards exist and are given to students. |
UoS standards align with program standards and are given to students |
Assessment will be evaluated solely on the basis of students' achievement against criteria and standards specified to align with learning outcomes |
Students' grades are aligned with the UoS and program standards. |
Students experience alignment between grades and standards. |
Assessment practices address issues of equity and inclusiveness to accommodate and build upon the diversity of the student body so as not to disadvantage any student |
Issues of equity and inclusiveness in assessment are considered and tackled. |
Students experience equity and inclusiveness. |
PRINCIPLE 4: ASSESSMENT PRACTICES MUST BE CONTINUOUSLY IMPROVED AND UPDATED |
|
|
Assessment tasks and outcomes are moderated through academic peer review and used to inform subsequent practice |
Academic peer review exists. |
Moderation of tasks and outcomes occurs. |
Assessment is regularly updated to ensure alignment with program learning outcomes or graduate attributes |
Assessment is regularly updated. |
Updates maintain alignment with learning outcomes. |
Professional development opportunities that are related to design, implementation and moderation of assessment are provided to staff |
Opportunities are made available to staff. |
Opportunities are taken up by staff. |
Further resources
- Assessment@Sydney Assessment Principles

- Assessment
: UTS - Ideas, strategies and resources for quality in student assessment
: Australian University Teaching Committee - Assessment
: Flinders University - Assessment Research Centre
: University of Melbourne - About assessment
: Teaching and Educational Development Institute, University of Queensland - Selecting methods of assessment
: Oxford Brookes University - Designing assessment tasks
: Oxford Brookes University