%0 Journal Article %~ PubMed %A Black, Kirsten %A Lotke, Pamela %A Buhling, Kai J %A Zite, Nikki B %A , and on behalf of the Intrauterine contraception for Nulliparous women: Translating Research into Action (INTRA) group %T A review of barriers and myths preventing the more widespread use of intrauterine contraception in nulliparous women. %B The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care %D 2012 %C United Kingdom %I Informa Healthcare %V 17 %N 5 %P 340-350 %@ 1473-0782 %X Objectives Intrauterine contracepives (IUCs) are highly effective and safe for use in all women, including those who are nulliparous. However, many myths and barriers prevent more widespread utilisation. The objective of this article was to explore the health care provider (HCP), health system and user issues that prevent more widespread use of IUCs, particularly among nulliparous women, and to present the evidence that supports achieving greater utilisation of these devices. Methods MEDLINE, PubMed and Embase were used to identify studies reporting attitudes and beliefs around IUCs, and clinical studies providing evidence of their risks and benefits. Results HCP, health system and user factors limiting use of IUCs were identified. The most widely explored barriers in published studies are those at the HCP level. User barriers are less well documented and health system barriers are mostly assessed through indirect evidence. Many, but not all, of the barriers can be reduced through greater understanding of the evidence. Conclusions Efforts need to be made to disseminate the evidence, which shows that few contraindications exist to IUC use. Addressing HCP lack of knowledge, training and confidence with IUC insertions, particularly in nulliparous women, could make a substantial positive impact on IUC utilisation. %Z FOR Codes: 110399 111402 %0 Journal Article %~ PubMed %A Harvey, Caroline %A Bateson, Deborah %A Wattimena, Jeany %A Black, Kirsten I %T Ease of intrauterine contraceptive device insertion in family planning settings. %B Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology %D 2012 %C Australia %I Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia %V 52 %N 6 %P 534-539 %@ 1479-828X %X %Z FOR Codes: 111404 %0 Journal Article %~ PubMed %A Lee, Yy %A Roberts, Cl %A Dobbins, T %A Stavrou, E %A Black, K %A Morris, J %A Young, J %T Incidence and outcomes of pregnancy-associated cancer in Australia, 1994-2008: a population-based linkage study. %B BJOG %D 2012 %C United Kingdom %I Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. %V 119 %N 13 %P 1572-1582 %@ 1471-0528 %X Please cite this paper as: Lee Y, Roberts C, Dobbins T, Stavrou E, Black K, Morris J, Young J. Incidence and outcomes of pregnancy-associated cancer in Australia, 1994-2008: a population-based linkage study. BJOG 2012; DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03475.x. Objective??? To determine trends in pregnancy-associated cancer and associations between maternal cancer and pregnancy outcomes. Design??? Population-based cohort study. Setting??? New South Wales, Australia, 1994-2008. Population??? A total of 781???907 women and their 1???309???501 maternities. Methods??? Cancer and maternal information were obtained from linked cancer registry, birth and hospital records for the entire population. Generalised estimating equations with a logit link were used to examine associations between cancer risk factors and pregnancy outcomes. Main outcome measures??? Incidence of pregnancy-associated cancer (diagnosis during pregnancy or within 12???months of delivery), maternal morbidities, preterm birth, and small- and large-for-gestational-age (LGA). Results??? A total of 1798 new cancer diagnoses were identified, including 499 during pregnancy and 1299 postpartum. From 1994 to 2007, the crude incidence rate of pregnancy-associated cancer increased from 112.3 to 191.5 per 100???000 maternities (P???