Projects & feedback
Client satisfaction survey
The Procurement Services satisfaction rating is based on feedback relating to the benefits that we provide to our clients. There are four broad areas that the survey attempts to cover.
- Procurement Services understanding of clients' requirements
- Professionalism of the engagement
- Promptness of our service delivery
- Use of technology

Source: PeoplePulse Procurement Customer Survey 2011
Project highlights
Procurement Services currently work on a number of projects - these include ongoing category management and one-off special projects. Two examples are given below.
| Fleet Management | |
|---|---|
| Client |
University-wide initiative. Our clients include all drivers and custodians of University owned vehicles. |
| Project description |
Fleet is being managed as a strategic category of spend within the University. The University recently decided to extend its contract with WebFleet until March 2012 (at the same time negotiating a 17% reduction in its 'management fees') to progress initiatives that have been commenced, and to formulate the medium to long term direction for this category. The focus here is on a few initiatives that are being considered and implemented, with a focus on social responsibility and sustainability. |
| Objective |
The University recognises its carbon footprint and is actively implementing initiatives that will positively impact this. These initiatives within Fleet, driven by Procurement Services, align with the University's greater objective. |
| Outcomes |
|
| Provision of Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility | |
|---|---|
| Client |
Financial Services |
| Project description |
The purpose of this project was to establish a revolving unsecured credit facility with either one or two banks to provide funding up to $500M over the next 5 years to assist the University with its infrastructure/facility devlopment. This project was the largest sourcing exercise the University has conducted in its 150 year history. |
| Objective |
Conduct a Selective Request for Tender to establish the best Value for Money Unsecured Credit Facility for the University. |
| Outcomes |
Through the competitive process that was conducted and the thorough evaluation process, the University was able to successfully establish a Debt Facility which generated approximately $10M in savings with $1.8M in extractable savings. This outcome has also placed the University in an advantageous position to leverage further engagements in the finance area going forward. |
