Skip to main content
Unit outline_

ANTH3653: Economy and Culture

Semester 1, 2022 [Normal day] - Remote

Economy and Culture provides tools for the understanding of economic activity as both a foundation and an expression of human sociality. It approaches material and cultural practice as inextricably linked in the shaping of the social, and explains that linkage through the discussion of ethnographically grounded studies and theorists. Against this background, economic practices characterised as rational, irrational, inspired, magical, informal, corrupt or devilish will be analysed as sources of an anthropological inquiry into the human condition and its social dimensions.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Anthropology
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
12 credit points at 2000 level in the Anthropology major
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
ANTH2653
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Shiori Shakuto, shiori.shakuto@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Shiori Shakuto, shiori.shakuto@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Final Essay
Answer one essay question from the list
35% STUVAC
Due date: 05 Jun 2022 at 23:00
2800 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO8
Assignment Short Essay
A critical evaluation of a selected product or an economic activity
20% Week 06
Due date: 03 Apr 2022 at 23:00
1000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Presentation group assignment Group Presentation
Group presentation on a selected case study
20% Week 10
Due date: 02 May 2022 at 14:00

Closing date: 02 May 2022
Equivalent of 600 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8
Assignment Peer Review
Provide feedback (300 word each) on 3 group presentations
15% Week 11
Due date: 09 May 2022 at 13:00
900 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO7
Small continuous assessment Participation & Weekly Reflections
Short weekly reflections on the classroom learning and readings
10% Weekly 280 characters x 10 weeks (700 words)
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO4 LO3 LO2
group assignment = group assignment ?

Assessment summary

Please note that completion of all assessment items is required to pass the unit of study, regardless of marks attained for any particular item of assessment. Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

 

 

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a High distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a Distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result Name Mark Range Description
High Distinction 85 - 100  
Distinction 75 - 84  
Credit 65 - 74  
Pass 50 - 64  
Fail 0 - 49 When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

 

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

Late submission In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date: Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date. After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction: Rethinking Economy from Culture Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 02 Economy and Culture: Whose Work is it? Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 03 Economy and Culture: Love and Money Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 04 Economy and Culture: Race and Global Inequality Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 05 Economy and Culture: Nature in Factory Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 06 Tools of Economies: How do Corporations and Market Behave? Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 07 Tools of Economies: Technologies and Innovation Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 08 Tools of Economies: Debt Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 09 Group Work Independent study (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8
Week 10 Group Presentation Workshop (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8
Week 11 "Alternative" Economy: Fair Trade and Organic Markets Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 12 "Alternative" Economy: Reimagining Finances Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 13 "Alternative" Economy: Circular Economy Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance and class requirements

  • Attendance: According to Faculty Board Resolutions, students in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences are expected to attend 90% of their classes. If you attend less than 50% of classes, regardless of the reasons, you may be referred to the Examiner’s Board. The Examiner’s Board will decide whether you should pass or fail the unit of study if your attendance falls below this threshold.

  • Lecture recording: Most lectures (in recording-equipped venues) will be recorded and may be made available to students on the LMS. However, you should not rely on lecture recording to substitute your classroom learning experience.

  • Preparation: Students should commit to spend approximately three hours’ preparation time (reading, studying, homework, essays, etc.) for every hour of scheduled instruction.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Here is the list of readings covered in the course. All readings will be made available on Canvas. 

 

Marcal, Katrine and Vogel, Saskia, 2015. Who Cooked Adam Smith’s Dinner? : A Story about Women and Economics, Scribe Publications. Prologue and Chapter 1.

 

Salian, Priti, 2022. “The Hard Labour that Fuels the Hair Trade” Sapiens.

 

Rolston, Jessica Smith, 2014. Mining Coal and Undermining Gender: Rhythms of Work and Family in the American West. Rutgers University Press. Chapter 1. Pp. 3-34.

 

Hoang, Kimberly Kay. 2015. Dealing in Desire: Asian Ascendancy, Western Decline, and the Hidden Currencies of Global Sex Work. University of California Press. Pp. 1-25.

 

Freeman, Carla. 2014. Entrepreneurial Selves: Neoliberal Respectability and the Making of a Caribbean Middle Class. Chapter 2. Pp. 57-95.

 

Chin, Elizabeth. 1999. “Ethnically Correct Dolls: Toying with the Race IndustryAmerican Ethnologist. 11(2). Pp. 305 – 321.

 

West, Paige. 2016. Dispossession and the Environment: Rhetoric and Inequality in Papua New Guinea. Columbia University Press. Chapter 2. Pp. 63-86.

 

Meiu, George Paul. 2014. “‘Beach-Boy Elders’ and ‘Young Big-Men’: Subverting the Temporalities of Ageing in Kenya’s Ethno-Erotic EconomiesEthnos. 80(4), pp. 472-496.

 

Blanchette, Alex. 2020. Porkopolis: American Animality, Standardized Life, and the Factory Farm. Duke University Press. Introduction. Pp. 1-30.

 

Karen Hébert. 2014. “The matter of market devices: Economic transformation in a southwest Alaskan salmon fishery”. Geoforum. 53. Pp. 21-30.

 

Welker, Marina. 2014. Enacting the Corporation: An American Mining Firm in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia. University of California Press. Introduction.

 

Ho, Karen. 2009. Liquidated: An Ethnography of Wall Street. Duke University Press. Chapter 6. Pp. 249- 294.

 

Mavhunga, Clapperton Chakanetsa. 2014. Transient Workspaces: Technologies of Everyday Innovation in Zimbabwe. MIT Press. Introduction. Pp.5 – 21.  

 

Frey, Bronwyn. 2020. XLI(1). “Platform Labour and In/Formality: Organization among Motorcycle Taxi Drivers in Bandung, Indonesia”.  Anthropology of Work Review. 36-49.

 

Bear, Laura. 2015. Navigating Austerity: Currents of Debt along a South Asian River. Stanford University Press. Introduction. Pp.1-26.

 

Stout, Noelle. 2019. Dispossessed: How Predatory Bureaucracy Foreclosed on the American Middle Class. Introduction. Pp. 1-35.

 

Besky, Sarah. 2013. The Darjeeling Distinction: Labor and Justice on Fair-trade Tea Plantations in India. University of California. Introduction. Pp 1-37.

 

Cody, Sacha. 2019. “‘A New Consciousness of the Countryside’? Elite Ruralism in Contemporary China” Asian Anthropology 18(1). Pp. 21-36.

 

Calvão, Filipe. 2019. “Crypto-miners: Digital Labour and the Power of Blockchain Technology” Economic Anthropology. 6. Pp. 123-134.

 

Rudnyckyj, Daromir. 2018. Beyond Debt: Islamic Experiments in Global Finance. University of Chicago Press. Introduction. Pp. 1-21.  

 

Isenhour, Cindy and Reno, Joshua. 2019. “On Materiality and Meaning: Ethnographic Engagements with Reuse, Repair & Care” Worldwide Waste: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. 2(1): 1, 1-8.

 

Zhang, Amy. 2020. “Circularity and Enclosures: Metabolizing Waste with the Black Soldier Fly” Cultural Anthropology. 35(1),  pp.  74–103.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Understand main debates and conceptual tools in economic anthropology
  • LO2. Identify how culture affects economic practices, and how economic practices in turn affects cultural practices.
  • LO3. Identify and critique assumptions about contemporary economic life and explore opportunities and challenges for more equitable economic practices
  • LO4. Incorporate academic knowledge in everyday life by applying conceptual tools to interpret economic practices
  • LO5. Articulate one’s ideas persuasively by integrating empirical description and theoretical analysis
  • LO6. Develop teamwork skills through working in small groups
  • LO7. Acquire communication skills by providing constructive feedback to peers
  • LO8. Learn to listen and incorporate peer feedback so as to improve one’s understanding of the topic

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

This is the first time this unit has been offered by this instructor

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.