Skip to main content
Unit outline_

CSCD3082: Phonology, Language and Literacy

Semester 2, 2021 [Normal day] - Remote

Students will acquire in-depth knowledge in the study of phonology, language and literacy as they relate to children and adolescents with communication disorders. This unit will cover the interactions between phonology, language and literacy in both acquisition and impairment. Students will study older school age children/adolescent language and collaborative partnerships relating to language and literacy development in the primary and high school settings.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Communication Sciences
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
CSCD2057 and (CSCD1033 or CSCD2068) and (CSCD2066 or CSCD2067)
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Natalie Munro, natalie.munro@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Julia Starling, julia.starling@sydney.edu.au
Karen James, karen.james@sydney.edu.au
Tutor(s) Nichola Shelton, nichola.shelton@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Quiz
MCQ and SA on language and literacy
30% Week 05
Due date: 09 Sep 2021 at 12:00

Closing date: 09 Sep 2021
45 mins
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9 LO10 LO11
Assignment group assignment Assessment and therapy plan
school age assessment plan, interpretation and goal setting
35% Week 09
Due date: 15 Oct 2021 at 23:00

Closing date: 15 Oct 2021
6 pages
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO10 LO11 LO15
Assignment group assignment Collaborative co-practice assignment
Teacher resource evaluation, coaching plan and role play
35% Week 13
Due date: 12 Nov 2021 at 23:00

Closing date: 12 Nov 2021
up to 4 pages and a 2 min video
Outcomes assessed: LO5 LO9 LO12 LO13 LO14 LO15 LO16
group assignment = group assignment ?

Assessment summary

Students must complete all the assessment tasks to pass the entire unit. Failure to complete any assessment item will result in you being awarded a Fail grade, regardless of your cumulative marks in the unit of study. Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas

 

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

 

Distinction

75 - 84

 

Credit

65 - 74

 

Pass

50 - 64

 

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

The Assessment Procedures 2011 provide that any written work submitted after 11:59pm on the due date will be penalised by 5% of the maximum awardable mark for each calendar day after the due date. If the assessment is submitted more than ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Overview of unit and overview of oral and written language disorders Lecture (2 hr)  
Language Disorder classification processes Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 02 Literacy development: school-age and adolescent Lecture (2 hr)  
From oral to written language Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 03 Language and literacy disorders: nature and impact Lecture (2 hr)  
Linking language to literacy Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 04 Literacy across the years: assessment and intervention Lecture (2 hr)  
Literacy interventions: from reading accuracy to comprehension Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 05 School-age language assessments Lecture (2 hr)  
Critiquing school-age language assessment resources Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 06 School-age language intervention: Direct approaches Lecture (2 hr)  
The How’s and Why’s of direct language interventions Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 07 Adolescent language assessments Lecture (2 hr)  
Critiquing adolescent language assessment resources Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 08 Adolescent language intervention: Direct approaches Lecture (2 hr)  
Case studies Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 09 School-age and adolescent service delivery: collaborative model Lecture (2 hr)  
Program implementation: issues and benefits Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 10 The collaborative approach: Teachers’ written language Lecture (2 hr)  
Practice in written language modifications Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 11 The collaborative approach: Teachers’ oral language Lecture (2 hr)  
Practice in oral language modifications Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 12 Additional models of service delivery: from advocacy to supporting life skills Lecture (2 hr)  
DLD advocacy: developing a broad brush approach Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 13 Supporting clients with Emotional/Behavioural Disorders Lecture (2 hr)  
Informal conversation approaches to EBD caseloads. Tutorial (1 hr)  

Attendance and class requirements

Attendace: Students are expected to attend all lectures and tutorials for the duration of the semester. Students are also expected to actively participate in and prepare for weekly lectures and tutorials, and to complete activities that are provided to increase your understanding and learning.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

All readings for this unit can be accessed through the Library eReserve, available on Canvas.

  • Paul, R., Norbury, C., & Gosse, C. (2018). Language disorders from infancy through adolescence: Listening, speaking, reading, writing, and communicating (5th ed.). Maryland Heights, MO: Elsevier/Mosby.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. describe the nature of spoken and written language impairments in school-age children and adolescents, and demonstrate appropriate assessment and evidence-based speech pathology practice planning
  • LO2. explain the relationship and development of language and literacy in the school age years
  • LO3. integrate knowledge for clinical assessment, analysis, goal planning, and intervention from CSCD 2068 Speech Sound Disorders with CSCD 2057 Child Language in the management of complex cases of concomitant phonological processing, language and literacy difficulties in primary school-age children and young people
  • LO4. develop written assessment plans and management plans for children with concomitant phonology, phonological processing, language and literacy difficulties in preschoolers, school-age children and adolescents
  • LO5. describe health information (what DLD is, in addition to the prevalence, impact, potential outcomes, risk and protective factors associated with DLD) in lay terms for parents, in addition to other health and education professionals
  • LO6. select and justify clinical procedures (e.g. assessments, goal setting, intervention) related to the child’s language/communication status, his/her cultural and social practices, family centred practice and evidence-based practice
  • LO7. exercise critical judgement in the interpretation of assessment results including selecting appropriate norms and health information considering normal communication development, determining gaps in information and integrating information from a range of sources
  • LO8. use information technology to locate peer reviewed research evidence; locate and create clinical resources for children with DLD; and interact with public awareness resources about DLD (e.g., RADLD, twitter)
  • LO9. create innovative, engaging and culturally appropriate clinical resources for children with DLD and their teachers
  • LO10. consolidate knowledge of the recommended best practices for the provision of culturally competent and safe services to multilingual children with DLD
  • LO11. continue to develop awareness of cultural and linguistic difference in communication development in cultures relevant to the Australian context and differentiate this from DLD
  • LO12. identify factors for advocating for speech pathology services associated with comorbid language disorder in children with DLD
  • LO13. identify how speech pathologists’ work with other professionals in a range of team models (e.g. multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary)
  • LO14. explain the importance of collaborative partnerships in classroom settings and with families; and support implications for children with developmental language disorders
  • LO15. operate effectively and ethically as a team member for teaching/learning activities and assessment tasks
  • LO16. learn to identify yourself as a speech pathologist when working in a variety of contexts including schools, clinics, teams with multiple disciplines, and other community contexts

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9
LO1         
LO2         
LO3         
LO4         
LO5         
LO6         
LO7         
LO8         
LO9         
LO10         
LO11         
LO12         
LO13         
LO14         
LO15         
LO16         
Competency-based Occupational Standards for Speech Pathologists -
Competency code Taught, Practiced or Assessed Competency standard
1.1 A Investigate and document the client’s communication and/or swallowing condition and explore the primary concerns of the client.
1.2 A Identify the communication and/or swallowing conditions requiring investigation and use the best available scientific and clinical evidence to determine the most suitable assessment procedures in partnership with the client.
2.1 A Analyse and interpret speech pathology assessment data.
2.2 A Identify gaps in information required to understand the client’s communication and swallowing issues and seek information to fill those gaps.
2.3 A Determine the basis for or diagnosis of the communication and/or swallowing condition and determine the possible outcomes.
2.4 A Report on analysis and interpretation.
3.1 A Use integrated and interpreted information (outlined in Unit 2) relevant to the communication and/or swallowing condition, and/or the service provider’s policies and priorities to plan evidence-based speech pathology practice.
3.2 A Seek additional information required to plan evidence-based speech pathology practice.
3.3 A Discuss long-term outcomes and collaborate with the client and/or significant others to decide whether or not speech pathology strategies are suitable and/or required.
3.4 A Establish goals for intervention in collaboration with the client and significant others.
3.5 A Select an evidence-based speech pathology approach or intervention in collaboration with the client and significant others.
3.6 A Define roles and responsibilities for the management of the client’s swallowing and/ or communication condition.
3.7 A Document speech pathology intervention plans, goals and outcome measurement.
4.5 A Identify the scope and nature of speech pathology practice in a range of community and work place contexts.
4.6 A Undertake preventative, educational and/or promotional projects or programs on speech pathology and other related topics as part of a team with other professionals.
5.1 A Respond to service provider’s policies.
6.1 A Develop, contribute to, and maintain professional and team based relationships in practice contexts.
7.1 A Uphold the Speech Pathology Australia Code of Ethics and work within all the relevant legislation and legal constraints, including medico-legal responsibilities.
7.4 A Advocate for self, client and the speech pathology profession.

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.