Skip to main content
Unit outline_

EDPT5003: Environmental Education Programs

Semester 2, 2021 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

Education is an essential element in addressing the persistent environmental problems society is currently facing. This unit examines issues related to the declining opportunity for students and community to engage with outdoor learning and their lack of opportunity to make a positive impact on their local environment. Connecting people with nature has profound benefits on knowledge retention, and supports students to develop investigative skills, to acquire an attitude of care for the environment and to practise the principles of ecological sustainability. In this unit, participants will gain an advanced understanding of contemporary environmental education theory, research and practice. Using Taronga Conservation Society of Australia as a case study, current environmental education programs that demonstrate positive conservation outcomes will be investigated. This unit provides participants with the knowledge and skills to be effective environmental educators. Various teaching pedagogies will be explored which will help participants gain the expertise to move beyond the classroom with their practice. The major focus of this unit is to teach current and aspiring educators how to design authentic environmental education programs, for all academic levels, that will enable their students to participate actively as citizens in protecting the environment and contribute to the development of an enduring sustainable, environmentally sound society.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Education
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Donna O'Connor, donna.oconnor@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Paul Mason, paul.mason@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment hurdle task Environmental education grant application
Prepare a grant application to fund an environmental education program
20% Week 04
Due date: 03 Sep 2021 at 17:00
1000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO3 LO4
Assignment hurdle task Literature review
Source & review a recently published academic conservation education book
20% Week 08
Due date: 08 Oct 2021 at 17:00
1000 words + 1000 word presentation
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2
Assignment hurdle task Multispecies ethnography of Zoo-based conservation education
Observe, document & analyse 2 zookeeper talks & write 2 mini ethnographies
20% Week 11
Due date: 29 Oct 2021 at 17:00
2 x 500 words = 1000 words total
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2
Assignment hurdle task Design and develop an environmental education program
Draw on pedagogical principles to design an environmental education program
40% Week 12
Due date: 05 Nov 2021 at 17:00
2000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
hurdle task = hurdle task ?

Assessment summary

Students must satisfactorily complete all four assessments in order to pass this unit. Students must demonstrate initiative to source appropriate literature to review for their book review as well as suitable real life grant applications to base their environmental education grant application upon. 

  1. The multispecies ethnography will be based upon fieldwork at Taronga and will involve both qualitative research and critical interpretive writing skills;
  2. The grant application should be in line with a project that the student is passionate about or currently working on;
  3. The book review should be based on a book on environmental education that has been written within the last five years, or a comparative review of two conservation education books that have been written in the last thirty years;
  4. The environmental education program design is the capstone assignment for this unit. Students are free to choose their topic and target group, but must design their pedagogy in relation to the best current theory and practice in environmental education.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a High distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a Distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

 

Distinction

75 - 84

 

Credit

65 - 74

 

Pass

50 - 64

 

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

 

.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

Late penalties will follow standard university procedure.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 The Multispecies Turn in Environmental Education Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4
Multispecies ethnography of zookeeper talks Field trip (6 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 02 Connect - Understand - Act: Zoo-based education Seminar (2 hr) LO3 LO4
Week 03 Social dimensions of environmental education Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 04 Pedagogy of the oppressed in more-than-human worlds Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO4
Week 05 Habitat as metaphor - Landscape as classroom Seminar (2 hr) LO3 LO4
Week 06 Praxis & Globalisation Seminar (2 hr) LO2 LO4
Week 07 Collaborative Ecological Inquiry Seminar (2 hr) LO2 LO3
Week 08 Indigenous & community engagement Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 09 Disrupting & Designing Conservation Education Programs Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance: The Sydney School of Education and Social Work requires attendance of at least 90 percent of all seminars, workshops or lectures. Where a student is unable to attend at the required rate evidence of illness or misadventure may be required and the student may be required to undertake extra work. Students should discuss the circumstances of their absence(s) with the co-ordinator of the unit of study. Further details are provided in the School canvas site: https://canvas.sydney.edu.au/courses/13426

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

WEEK ONE
The Multispecies Turn

Optional readings:

Hecht, M., Crowley, K., & Russell, J. (2020). Decentering Humans in the Learning Sciences: The Role of Nonhuman Nature and Place in Learning Ecosystems. https://repository.isls.org/bitstream/1/6679/1/501-504.pdf

Berrigan, C. (2014). “Life cycle of a common weed”, in Eben Kirksey (ed), The multispecies salon,, 164-80.

Tsing, A. L. (2014). “Blasted landscapes (and the gentle arts of mushroom picking)”, in Eben Kirksey (ed), The multispecies salon, 87-109.

 

WEEK TWO
Connect Understand Act 

Prescribed Readings:

Bell, L., & Clover, D. E. (2017). Critical culture: Environmental adult education in public museums. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2017(153), 17-29. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ace.20218

Lowry, R. (2009). Visitor based conservation campaigns. Journal of the International Zoo Educators Association, 45, 11-14.

Lowry, R (2007) Werribee Open Range Zoo takes sustainability education to Zimbabwe. International Zoo Educators Journal, Volume, 43, pp.16–17.

Optional readings:
Knight, A. T., Cowling, R. M., Rouget, M., Balmford, A., Lombard, A. T., & Campbell, B. M. (2008). Knowing but not doing: selecting priority conservation areas and the research–implementation gap. Conservation biology, 22(3), 610-617.

Fischer, J., & Riechers, M. (2019). A leverage points perspective on sustainability. People and Nature.
 

 

WEEK THREE
Social dimensions of Environmental education

Clover, D. E., Jayme, B. D. O., Hall, B. L., & Follen, S. (2013). The nature of transformation: Environmental adult education (Vol. 11). Springer Science & Business Media. Chapter 1

Kassas, M. (2002). Environmental education: biodiversity. Environmentalist22(4), 345-351.

Sauvé, L. (2005). Currents in Environmental Education: Mapping a Complex and Evolving Pedagogical Field. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 10(1), 11-37.

 

WEEK FOUR
Pedagogy of the oppressed in more-than-human worlds

Prescribed reading:

Clover, D. E., Jayme, B. D. O., Hall, B. L., & Follen, S. (2013). The nature of transformation: Environmental adult education (Vol. 11). Springer Science & Business Media.

Recommended reading:

Freire, P. (2018). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Bloomsbury publishing USA.

 

WEEK FIVE:
Habitat as metaphor, landscape as classroom

Clover, D. E., Jayme, B. D. O., Hall, B. L., & Follen, S. (2013). The nature of transformation: Environmental adult education (Vol. 11). Springer Science & Business Media. Chapter 3.

Brandt, C. B. (2013). Landscapes as contexts for learning. International handbook of research on environmental education, 275-283.

Askland, H. H., & Bunn, M. (2018). Lived experiences of environmental change: Solastalgia, power and place. Emotion, Space and Society, 27, 16-22.

 

WEEK SIX
Praxis & Globalisation

Clover, D. E., Jayme, B. D. O., Hall, B. L., & Follen, S. (2013). The nature of transformation: Environmental adult education (Vol. 11). Springer Science & Business Media. Chapters 4 & 5.

 

WEEK SEVEN
Collaborative Ecological Inquiry

Bradbury, H., & Long, K. (2010). Collaborative ecological inquiry: Where action research meets sustainable development, pp. 459-468.

 

WEEK EIGHT

Indigenous & community engagement

Chao, S. (2019) The Truth About “Sustainable” Palm Oil, Sapiens, 13 June 2019.

Shava, S. (2013). “The representation of Indigenous knowledges”. International handbook of research on environmental education, 384-393.

 

WEEK NINE
Disrupting & Designing Environmental Education

Prescribed readings:

Mannion, G. (2019). Re-assembling environmental and sustainability education: orientations from new materialism. Environmental Education Research, 1-20.

Monroe, M. C., Adams, A. E., & Greenaway, A. (2019). Considering research paradigms in environmental education.

Ruck, A., & Mannion, G. (2019). Fieldnotes and situational analysis in environmental education research: experiments in new materialism. Environmental Education Research, 1-18.

Niedermeyer, F. C., & Roberson, E. J. (1981). A Checklist for Reviewing Energy Education programs. Science and Children, 20-22.

EAZA. (2016). EAZA conservation education standards.

Esson, M., & Moss, A. (2016). The challenges of evaluating conservation education across cultures. International Zoo Yearbook, 50(1), 61-67.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Demonstrate in-depth knowledge and understanding of contemporary human-environment issues and their implications for environmental education theory and practice.
  • LO2. Critically analyse education programs in terms of their potential to deliver ethical, environmental education experiences with positive conservation and education outcomes.
  • LO3. Embed scientific principals into education programs in a way that is relevant to students, creating lasting understanding of environmental values.
  • LO4. • Design authentic environmental education programs that integrate rich learning experiences, teach civic responsibility, and are conducive to the achievement of environmental conservation

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

The selection of readings has been updated to reflect the best current theory and methods in the field. The assignments have been finetuned to meet the future skillsets required of aspiring environmental educators.

Site visit guidelines

If you are undertaking professional experience/field education placement as part of your enrolment in this unit of study, please assess your specific needs and requirements for the safe and successful completion of an external placement within a host organisation. You will be given the opportunity to disclose any health issues that have a work health and safety significance before arranging a placement so that your safety, and the safety of others, can be properly assessed. The Professional Experience Coordinator/Field Education Manager will work to ensure that the workplace assignment to you is appropriate for your needs and requirements. If you are experiencing disability, and require reasonable adjustments to be arranged, please contact Disability Services as early as possible prior to commencing the internship. Please note, in all cases, and for the purpose of organising reasonable adjustments, only the impact and not the nature, of your disability will be disclosed to the host organisation.

Work, health and safety

COVIDsafe procedures such as handwashing, social distancing and mask wearing are to be observed.

Good footwear should be worn to the Taronga site as well as clothing appropriate for the weather conditions on any given day.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.