Skip to main content
Unit outline_

EDUF4044: Reading and Applying Educational Research

Semester 2, 2023 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

Teachers use and engage in research in a range of different ways with the aim of informing and improving their practice, from using reseach done by others to inform their decision making, to conducting classroom-based inquiry as professional learning and development. This unit of study is designed to equip you with the understanding and skills required to embed research into your everyday practice as a teacher. You will be encouraged to develop an appreciation of the broad range of research topics in education and their associated forms of systematic inquiry and to develop your capacity to make links between research, policy, teaching and learning. The unit will provide opportunities for you to become more familiar with the relationship between research and practice so that you can locate, critically analyse and use published material to investigate, understand and enrich your own practice and, in the future, exercise leadership in this regard. A series of expert lectures in the production and use of educational research will be complemented by workshops and assessment tasks designed to encourage you to synthesise different kinds and sources of research-based knowledge about students, teachers, schools, classrooms and communities.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Education
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
96 credit points of units, including (EDUF2006 and EDUF2007)
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Lina Markauskaite, lina.markauskaite@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Kathryn Bartimote, kathryn.bartimote@sydney.edu.au
Neriman Coskun, neriman.coskun@sydney.edu.au
Pat Norman, pat.norman@sydney.edu.au
Lina Markauskaite, lina.markauskaite@sydney.edu.au
Aek Phakiti, aek.phakiti@sydney.edu.au
Julian Wood, julian.wood@sydney.edu.au
Tutor(s) Dominic Hearne, dominic.hearne@sydney.edu.au
Claudia Alarcon Espinoza, claudia.alarconespinoza@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Presentation group assignment Assignment 2: An interactive mini-tutorial
Develop & facilitate a mini-tutorial on an assigned course theme
25% Multiple weeks
Closing date: 22 Sep 2023
25 minutes (equivalent to 1100 words)
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO4 LO5 LO6
Assignment Assignment 3: A research literature review on a selected educational issue
Review of existing research on a selected educational issue
30% Please select a valid week from the list below
Due date: 04 Sep 2023 at 23:59
1200 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO6 LO5 LO2
Assignment Assignment 4: A plan for a classroom research project
The final assignment to demonstrate cumulative learning
35% Week 09
Due date: 03 Oct 2023 at 23:59
1600 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Online task Assignment 1: A research design task (weekly)
Completion of weekly research design activities in Weeks 1-4 and 6-7.
10% Weekly Equivalent to 600 words
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO5 LO3
group assignment = group assignment ?

Assessment summary

Assignment 1: A research design task (weekly): In weeks 1-4 and 6-7, you will complete weekly asynchronous activities related to the main aspects of research project design, such as an initial framing of the project, literature review, and methodological design. Timely and satisfactory completion of each week’s activity contributes 2% to your final mark (max. 10% in total). 

Assignment 2: An interactive mini-tutorial: In groups of about 2 students, you will design and facilitate an interactive tutorial for your peers in which you will explore deeper one methodological topic. This mini-tutorial will be a part of your weekly face-to-face tutorial session and will be aligned with the week's theme. It is expected to be up to 25 minutes, including any Q&A. Your tutor will assign you a topic and allocate you to a group.

Assignment 3: A literature review on a selected educational issue: For this task, you will choose an educational issue related to your future work as a teacher and write a literature review. This review should be written from a practitioner-researcher perspective. It should critically assess and synthesise what research says about your chosen issue, describe implications for educational practitioners and identify potential avenues for future practitioner research.

Assignment 4: A plan for a practitioner research project: For this task, you will draw on your literature review (Assignment 3) and develop a plan for a small-scale practitioner-driven research project based on a particular issue relevant to your future professional practice. The research project should relate to an aspect of your future professional career as a teacher and should be capable of being implemented in your next professional experience placement.

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a High distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a Distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High Distinction

85 - 100

The requirements and learning outcomes of the unit are met to the highest standard.

Distinction

75 - 84

The requirements and learning outcomes of the unit are met to a high standard.

Credit

65 - 74

The requirements and learning outcomes of the unit are met to a satisfactory standard.

Pass

50 - 64

The requirements and learning outcomes of the unit are met to the minimal standard.

Fail

0 - 49

The requirements and learning outcomes of the unit are not met to the minimal standard.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

Weekly tasks that contribute to Assignment 1 must be completed in time (0% will be awarded for late weekly submissions). Standard penalties apply for late submissions of all other assignments.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Educators and research: Introduction Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Asynchronous online Research design task Online class (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 02 Educators, ethics and research Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Asynchronous online Research design task Online class (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 03 Reading research Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Asynchronous online Research design task Online class (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 04 Methodological approaches and research designs in education Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Asynchronous online Research design task Online class (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 05 Qualitative research methods and data Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 06 Quantitative research methods and data Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Asynchronous online Research design task Online class (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 07 Research paradigms in educational research Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Asynchronous online Research design task Online class (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 08 Teacher-researcher: Practitioner research Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance: The Sydney School of Education and Social Work requires attendance of at least 90% of all seminars, workshops or lectures. Where a student is unable to attend at the required rate evidence of illness or misadventure may be required and the student may be required to undertake extra work. Students should discuss the circumstances of their absence(s) with the coordinator of the unit of study. Further details are provided in the School canvas site: https://canvas.sydney.edu.au/courses/13426

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Textbook: Moriarty, B. (2018). Research skills for teachers: From research question to research design. Allen and Unwin.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Read, understand and evaluate the various kinds of educational research that are needed for ongoing professional learning
  • LO2. Understand how to draw on relevant research to support learning and teaching
  • LO3. Design practitioner research projects to specific professional contexts
  • LO4. Use foundational educational data collection and analysis techniques
  • LO5. Connect theory, research and practice when using and planning research
  • LO6. Apply research to develop professional identities as educators and life-long learners.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Changes to assessments and activities: 1. Removed weekly asynchronous Single Case Research Design Tutorials and Assessment. 2. The final large assessment project split into two smaller assessments and redesigned. 3. Themes for interactive tutorials made more specific and distinct from the lectures.

Demerit for not meeting the word length requirement is 10% of the awarded mark unless otherwhise stated in the description of the assignment.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.