Skip to main content
Unit outline_

LAWS3401: Advanced Constitutional Law

Semester 2, 2024 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

The main purpose of this course is to build on the fundamental understandings achieved in Public Law and Federal Constitutional Law in order to provide a far broader and deeper understanding of the subject. This will be achieved by, first, examining in depth the fundamental aspects and tenets of constitutionalism in the Australian context and from a more jurisprudential perspective. Reliance will be placed on comparative jurisdictions, in particular the United States and the United Kingdom. A detailed analysis will first be attempted of the following major concepts in the more precise context of Westminster-based systems: the rule of law, parliamentary sovereignty, the ambit of executive power and the precise status and principles of responsible government, judicial review and constitutional rights, separation of powers, constitutional conventions, the reserve powers of the Governor-General, the status of common law principles as fundamental constitutional guarantees. A principal focus will be the nature and ambit of executive power, and the evolving jurisrprudence of the High Court on this question. The course will examine the evolving notion of parliamentary supremacy from Diceyan orthodoxy to the more recent debates involving leading constitutional scholars in the UK and Australia. In relation to separation of powers, the different constitutional consequences which result when the doctrine is entrenched in a written constitution (as in the US and Australia) on the one hand, and when it exists as a convention without being so entrenched, on the other, will be explored. The relationship between executive and legislative power will be the principal focus. This will enhance an understanding of the definition, nature and limits of judicial, executive and legislative power and their inter-relationship, an issue which becomes particularly important at moments of constitutional uncertainty and stress, especially at the crossroads of their power. The functionalist/formalist debate will be examined to determine the most appropriate interpretive methodology with respect to the application of the constitutional limitations which may emanate from the separation of powers. In so doing, the principal decisions of the High Court of Australia and other relevant courts in other jurisdictions. There will be an opportunity to evaluate major Australian constitutional decisions in a detail not possible in the prerequisite and undergraduate courses. A principal underlying theme will be the extent to which the tenets of constitutionalism are being complied with in Australia and the extent to which they can be. The course will be enriched and made more presently relevant by the exploration of current developing themes in constitutional law. The precise topics may vary from year to year. Depending on the topic, this may involve the introduction of completely new themes or the integration of developments with topics already examined.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Law
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
LAWS1021 and LAWS2011
Corequisites
? 
LAWS2011
Prohibitions
? 
LAWS5101
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Lisa Burton Crawford, l.crawford@sydney.edu.au
The census date for this unit availability is 2 September 2024
Type Description Weight Due Length
Short release assignment Short-release assignment (80%)
Written short answers
80% Formal exam period
Due date: 13 Nov 2024 at 17:00

Closing date: 20 Nov 2024
4500 words / 8 working days
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Participation Structured Class Participation (20%)
Class Participation
20% Ongoing Ongoing
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO4 LO3 LO2

Assessment summary

Structured Class Participation (20%): Active engagement with topics and participation in classes is an essential element for success in Advanced Constitutional Law. Students will be “on call” during two seminars over the course of the semester and will be responsible for:

  • arriving in class having completed the required reading(s).
  • summarising aspects of the case(s) being discussed e.g., the facts, decision, reasoning, differences in opinion between judges.
  • leading discussion, having prepared responses to questions in the reading guide.
  • being prepared to respond to questions/prompts from seminar participants “on their feet”.

Students will be able to nominate the two instances where they will be on call during Week 1 of the semester [29 July – 2 August]. The marking guide will be provided on the Canvas site, and any additional information on the participation requirement will be discussed in class and available via the unit Canvas site.

This participation task fosters an advanced and integrated understanding of Australian constitutional law by requiring students to prepare thoroughly and engage critically with complex legal materials, thus addressing ULO1. By summarising cases, leading discussions, and responding to questions, students develop the ability to analyse key rules, principles, and judicial reasoning (ULO2), critique the normativity and coherence of legal methodologies (ULO3), and construct and communicate persuasive legal arguments orally (ULO4).

Special Consideration: Students who are unable to attend the classes in which they are designated to lead discussion should in the first instance contact the convenor and ask to be assigned to another class. Grants of special consideration in relation to the participation component of Advanced Constitutional Law will involve an alternative assessment designed to help students achieve the same learning outcomes as the original task.

Short-release Assignment (80%):  Students will be presented with a choice of short answer questions, requiring them to critically reflect upon the cases and themes studied in the course. Students must answer 3 questions of their choice, and their mark for this assessment will be the sum of their best 2 answers.

Questions will be made available via the unit Canvas site at 5:00pm (Sydney, Australia time) on Friday 1 November 2024. Further instructions, requirements, and marking criteria will be discussed in class and made available on Canvas. Assessments must be submitted via Canvas no later than 5:00pm (Sydney, Australia time) on Wednesday, 13 November 2024.

The word limit for this assessment is 4500 words (1500 words per question) excluding footnotes, no bibliography required. This is a strict word limit with penalties imposed for any words in excess of stated limits. 

Assessments must adhere to the conventions of legal writing and use AGLC 4th Ed. Style for references and footnotes. However, a bibliography is not required. Students must declare any use of Generative Artificial Intelligence. However, students are advised that AI is unlikely to provide the depth of analysis that is required to achieve a high mark in this unit. AI must be used in compliance with the University of Sydney Policy.

This assessment fosters an advanced understanding of Australian constitutional law by requiring students to display an integrated understanding of the rules, principles and methodologies studied (ULO1). The questions will require students to extract key legal principles and judicial reasoning (ULO2) and critique the normativity and coherence of these principles (ULO3). Constructing and presenting a well-researched, persuasive argument enhances students ability to communicate complex legal ideas effectively (ULO4).

Word limit penalty: A piece of assessment which exceeds the prescribed word limit will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment for every 100 words, or part thereof. The total word count for essay and other written assessments will exclude all footnotes and no bibliography required and acknowledgment of permissible assistance from editors, automated writing tools or generative AI (if required). 

Use of editors and automated writing tools: In completing unsupervised assessments, students may use editors, proof-readers, and automated writing tools (including translation software, grammar checkers, reference generators and artificial intelligence), provided that all use is acknowledged and consistent with University policies and procedures including Academic Integrity Policy. Acknowledgment must be made in writing on the front of the work submitted for assessment, or in an appropriate footnote or other reference, and state the name of the person or software.  

Special consideration: Successful grants of Special Consideration may involve alternative tasks, as appropriate. 

Assessment requirements to pass a unit of study: A student must make a genuine attempt at all assessment tasks set out in this Unit of Study in order to obtain a Pass mark and grade (or above); otherwise an Absent Fail grade will be recorded as the student’s result for this Unit of Study. 

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2021 (Schedule 1). 

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

  • Completely answers the question.
  • Contains striking originality of approach or analysis.
  • Demonstrates exhaustive or innovative research (where independent research required).
  • Exceptionally well written, structured and expressed.
  • Exceptional statement and defence of a main thesis or argument.
  • Is otherwise exceptional in some way.

Distinction

75 - 84

  • Completely answers the question.
  • Achieves a critical and evaluative approach to the issues.
  • Content and structure is well organised in support of the argument.
  • Demonstrates extensive research and analysis to support a well-documented argument.
  • Generally well expressed and free from errors.
  • Has a clear structure and is well articulated.
  • Excellent statement and defence of a main thesis or argument.

Credit

65 - 74

  • Covers main issues fairly well in answering the question.
  • Contains no significant errors.
  • Demonstrates an attempted critical approach to the issues.
  • Demonstrates reasonably sound research and analysis in addressing the key issues.
  • Satisfactory statement and defence of a main thesis and argument.
  • Has a clear structure and reasonably clear expression.

Pass

50 - 64

  • Identifies the key issues, but does not follow through with a reasoned argument.
  • Contains some significant errors.
  • Displays satisfactory engagement with the key issues.
  • Offers a descriptive summary of material relevant to the question.
  • Superficial use of material, and may display a tendency to paraphrase.
  • Demonstrates little evidence of in-depth research or analysis.
  • Adequate expression.
  • Poor statement and defence of a main thesis and argument. 
  • Overall, demonstrates the minimum level of competence in the assessment and satisfies the requirements to proceed to higher-level studies in the degree or subject area.

Fail

0 - 49

  • Does not answer the question.
  • Contains significant or numerous errors.
  • Few or no identifiable arguments.
  • Content that is inappropriate or irrelevant.
  • Lack of research or analysis.
  • Difficult or impossible to understand through poor grammar, expression or structure.
  • There is no, or unsatisfactory, statement and defence of main thesis or argument. 
  • Overall, does not demonstrate the minimum level of competence in the assessment.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

The late submission of a piece of assessment, without an approved extension, will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment per calendar day or part thereof. For example, a submission after 5:00pm but by 11:59pm on the due date for submission will attract a 10% penalty. A submission after midnight of the due date for submission will attract a 20% penalty. A submission on the following day after midnight will attract a 30% penalty, and so on.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Support for students

The Support for Students Policy 2023 reflects the University’s commitment to supporting students in their academic journey and making the University safe for students. It is important that you read and understand this policy so that you are familiar with the range of support services available to you and understand how to engage with them.

The University uses email as its primary source of communication with students who need support under the Support for Students Policy 2023. Make sure you check your University email regularly and respond to any communications received from the University.

Learning resources and detailed information about weekly assessment and learning activities can be accessed via Canvas. It is essential that you visit your unit of study Canvas site to ensure you are up to date with all of your tasks.

If you are having difficulties completing your studies, or are feeling unsure about your progress, we are here to help. You can access the support services offered by the University at any time:

Support and Services (including health and wellbeing services, financial support and learning support)
Course planning and administration
Meet with an Academic Adviser

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Seminar 1: Welcome and introduction; navigating the Constitution. Seminar 2: Australian Constitutionalism Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 02 Seminar 1: Constitutional interpretation – Guest lecture by Justice William Gummow Seminar 2: Constitutional interpretation – Guest lecture by Professor Rosalind Dixon Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 03 Seminar 1: Love v Thoms (2020) 270 CLR 152 Seminar 2: Vanderstock v Victoria [2023] HCA 30 Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 04 Seminar 1: Thomas v Mowbray (2007) 233 CLR 307 Seminar 2: NZYQ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs & Anor [2023] HCA 37 Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 05 Seminar 1: Garlett v Western Australia (2022) 404 ALR 182 Seminar 2: Momcilovic v The Queen Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 08 Seminar 1: The evolution of s 92 – Guest lecture by Justice William Gummow Seminar 2: Palmer v WA (2021) 272 CLR 505 Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 09 Seminar 1: Gerner v Victoria (2020) 270 CLR 412 Seminar 2: Mineralogy Pty Ltd v WA (2021) 274 CLR 219; Palmer v WA (2021) 274 CLR 286 Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 11 Seminar 1: Monis v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 92 Seminar 2: Brown v Tasmania (2017) 261 CLR 328 Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 12 Seminar 1: Clubb v Edwards; Preston v Avery (2019) 267 CLR 171 Seminar 2: Comcare v Banerji (2019) 267 CLR 373 Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 13 Seminar 1: JT International SA v Commonwealth (2012) 250 CLR 1 Seminar 2: Yunupingu on behalf of the Gumatj Clan v Commonwealth (2023) FCAFC 75 Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance: All students are required to attend at least 70% of classes to satisfy the pass requirements for each unit of study. Failure to meet this requirement may result in a student being precluded from undertaking the final assessment. 

Referencing: The Sydney Law School expects you to use the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (4th edition, 2018) for your footnoting style, although you should confirm this with your lecturer. A link to the library website where this is set out comprehensively is available at Referencing and Citation Styles: AGLC4. 

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

All readings for this unit can be accessed through the 'Reading List' available on Canvas. 

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. advanced and integrated understanding of select rules, principles and methodologies of Australian constitutional law.
  • LO2. advanced ability to analyse constitutional law cases to extract key rules and principles and judicial reasoning.
  • LO3. advanced ability to analyse the normativity and coherence of select rules, principles and methodologies of Australian constitutional law.
  • LO4. advanced ability to create sound and persuasive legal arguments and communicate these to diverse legal audiences using multiple modes of communication.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Assessments have been changed since last taught.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.