Skip to main content
Unit outline_

LAWS3526: Global Engagement Law Program

Intensive January, 2023 [Block mode] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

This elective is designed for final and penltimate year law students to undertake a project which partially completed offshore with one of the University of Sydney Law School's international partners. Students will work individually or in groups on an issue of significance to the international partners in questions. This experience will allow students to apply their academic skills and disciplinary knowledge to a real-world issues in an authentic and meaningul way.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Law
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Chester Brown, chester.brown@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Simon Bronitt, simon.bronitt@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Presentation group assignment Group Presentation (0%)
Group presentation on allocated topic
0% Week 02
Due date: 21 Jan 2023 at 17:00

Closing date: 21 Jan 2023
20 minutes maximum / 10 working days
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5
Assignment Optional research paper proposal (0%)
research paper proposal
0% Week 02
Due date: 21 Jan 2023 at 17:00

Closing date: 21 Jan 2023
500 words / 10 working days
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Assignment Reflective Journal (20%)
Reflective journal
20% Week 04
Due date: 05 Feb 2023 at 17:00

Closing date: 19 Feb 2023
1000 words / 4 weeks
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
Assignment Written assessment following presentation (20%)
Written assessment following presentation
20% Week 05
Due date: 12 Feb 2023 at 17:00

Closing date: 26 Feb 2023
1000 words / 5 weeks
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
Assignment Research Paper (60%)
Research paper
60% Week 06
Due date: 17 Feb 2023 at 17:00

Closing date: 03 Mar 2023
4000 words / 6 weeks
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
group assignment = group assignment ?

Assessment summary

Group Presentation (0%) A 20 minute group presentation on a topic discussed during the program.  At the outset of the unit, students will be allocated into small groups (3-4 persons) comprised of students from Australia and India law. The topics allocated will relate to the themes in the course.  The group presentation will take place on Saturday 21 January 2023.  The outcome of a successful Special Consideration application may include an alternative task, at the discretion of the Unit Convenor.

Reflective Journal (20%) A reflective journal of 1,000 words is to be submitted within two weeks of the completion of the India Immersion Programme, ie by Sunday 5 February 2023 at 5pm (Sydney, Australia time).  The reflective journal must draw on a student’s own experiences and insights gained over the two weeks and must be submitted to the unit’s Canvas assignment dropbox.  The outcome of a successful Special Consideration application may include an alternative task, at the discretion of the Unit Convenor.

Written assessment following presentation (20%) Each individual student must submit their own paper, relating to the group presentation, that summarises and reflects upon the topic examined in the group, their contribution to the research and outlines the research findings.   The written assessment is due on Sunday 12 February 2023 at 5pm (Sydney, Australia time) and must be submitted to the unit’s Canvas assignment dropbox. The outcome of a successful Special Consideration application may include an alternative task, at the discretion of the Unit Convenor.

Research Paper (60%) A research paper of 4,000 words is to be submitted by Friday 17 February 2023 at 5pm (Sydney, Australia time) to the unit’s Canvas assignment dropbox.  A list of research questions will be provided to students at the commencement of the course. The research paper must address a topic covered or related to the material taught in the unit and must not substantially relate to the topic or material addressed in a student’s group presentation or written assessment following presentation.  The outcome of a successful Special Consideration application may include an alternative task, at the discretion of the Unit Convenor.

Optional research paper proposal (0%) Students who wish to identify their own topic for the research paper must devise a topic and prepare a research proposal which must be submitted to the Unit Convenor / seminar leaders by the final day of the course.  Students should be prepared to discuss their proposal on the final presentation day, Saturday 21 January 2023. There are no marks allocated for the proposal, only for the submitted research paper itself.  The purpose of the proposal is to ensure that students have a viable topic, appropriate to the word length.

The total word count for essay and other written assessments will exclude bibliography; footnote numbers; footnote citation; cover page and include body text; headings and sub-headings; quotations; anything other than numbers and citations in footnotes.

The use of editors (including proof-readers) is not permitted in the preparation of work submitted for Assessment. 

Assessment requirement to pass a unit of study 
A student must make a genuine attempt at all compulsory assessment tasks set out in this Unit of Study in order to obtain a Pass mark and grade (or above); otherwise an Absent Fail grade will be recorded as the student’s result for this Unit of Study. 

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

  • Completely answers the question.
  • Contains striking originality of approach or analysis.
  • Demonstrates exhaustive or innovative research (where independent research required).
  • Exceptionally well written, structured and expressed.
  • Is otherwise exceptional in some way.

Distinction

75 - 84

  • Completely answers the question.
  • Achieves a critical and evaluative approach to the issues.
  • Content and structure is well organised in support of the argument.
  • Demonstrates extensive research and analysis to support a well-documented argument.
  • Generally well expressed and free from errors.
  • Has a clear structure and is well articulated.

Credit

65 - 74

  • Covers main issues fairly well in answering the question.
  • Contains no significant errors
  • Demonstrates an attempted critical approach to the issues.
  • Demonstrates reasonably sound research and analysis in addressing the key issues.
  • Has a clear structure and reasonably clear expression.

Pass

50 - 64

  • Identifies the key issues, but does not follow through with a reasoned argument.
  • Contains some significant errors.
  • Displays satisfactory engagement with the key issues.
  • Offers descriptive summary of material relevant to the question.
  • Superficial use of material, and may display a tendency to paraphrase.
  • Demonstrates little evidence of in-depth research or analysis.
  • Adequate expression.
  • Overall, demonstrates the minimum level of competence in the assessment and satisfies the requirements to proceed to higher-level studies in the degree or subject area.

Fail

0 - 49

  • Does not answer the question.
  • Contains significant or numerous errors.
  • Few or no identifiable arguments.
  • Content that is inappropriate or irrelevant.
  • Lack of research or analysis.
  • Difficult or impossible to understand through poor grammar, expression or structure.
  • Overall, does not demonstrate the minimum level of competence in the assessment.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

The late submission of a piece of assessment, without an approved extension, will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment per 24 hours or part thereof, after the due time on the due date. SpeedGrader applies penalty precisely 24 hours after due date and time.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Day 2: Introduction to the India Australia relationship; Introduction to Comparative and Transnational Criminal Law Block teaching (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Day 3: Definitional and Conceptual Issues: What is corruption?; Global Regulatory Framework International Anti-Corruption Conventions Block teaching (6 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Day 4: Introduction to White-Collar Crime and Corruption; Introduction to Bribery Offences and Corporate Criminal Responsibility: India versus Australia Block teaching (6 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Day 5: Roundtable: presentations and group discussion with corporate lawyers Block teaching (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Day 6: Corruption and the rule of law; Corruption & Human Rights: Magnitsky Laws & Corporate Social Responsibility Block teaching (6 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 02 Day 9: How is India Governed: An Overview of Government and Public Policy in India; Religion, Caste and Communalism in India; Cultural Defence: the role of culture, tradition and caste in corruption Block teaching (4.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Day 10: Sports Corruption: Sports Law and Integrity; Sports Corruption: Case Studies Block teaching (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Day 12: Futures of Anti-Corruption Laws: From Zero Tolerance to Responsive Regulation; Group Presentation - Private Study Block teaching (4.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Day 14: India and Australia: Lessons and Reflections from India Immersion Programme Block teaching (1.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance: All students are required to attend 70% of classes to satisfy the pass requirements for each unit of study. Failure to meet this requirement may result in a student being precluded from sitting the final assessment, and being discontinued from the unit of study, resulting in an Absent Fail or Discontinue - Fail grade. 

Word count penalty: A piece of assessment which exceeds the prescribed word limit will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment for every 100 words, or part thereof. The total word count for essay and other written assessments will exclude bibliography; footnote numbers; footnote citation; cover page and include body text; headings and sub-headings; quotations; anything other than numbers and citations in footnotes.

Referencing: The Sydney Law School expects you to use the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (4th edition, 2018) for your footnoting style, although you should confirm this with your lecturer, and a link to the library website where this is set out comprehensively is available at https://libguides.library.usyd.edu.au/c.php?g=508212&p=3476376

Assignment submission: Students are required to submit their assignment in electronic form via Canvas by the submission deadline. Failure to submit by specified deadlines may result in penalties for lateness.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Required readings will be available on Canvas.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Identify the key aspects of anti-corruption law, transnational good governance principles and regulation.
  • LO2. Critically analyse and engage in discussion on different facets of Indian culture, society and law as discussed in the various seminars, and apply these concepts of integrity and good governance.
  • LO3. Critically analyse the concepts raised in seminars and identify them in the assigned readings.
  • LO4. Identify points of differences and similarities between Indian and Australian society, law and business, through the lens of good governance and integrity.
  • LO5. Undertake original research to apply key course concepts.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

New unit.

Additional costs

Information available on Canvas site.

Work, health and safety

Information available on Canvas site.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.