Skip to main content
Unit outline_

LAWS5000: Foundations of Law

Intensive March, 2020 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

This unit of study is designed to provide students with a foundation for the study of law. It introduces the skills of legal reasoning and analysis, with a particular focus on developing skills of statutory interpretation. These practical skills necessary to complete a law degree. This unit of study also includes a practical overview of the sources of law in the Australian legal system. In doing so, it also provides opportunities for critical engagement in debate about the role of law in our lives.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Law
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
LAWS1000 or LAWS1006
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Barbara McDonald, barbara.mcdonald@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Barbara McDonald, barbara.mcdonald@sydney.edu.au
Tutor(s) Rebecca Millar, rebecca.millar@sydney.edu.au
Elizabeth James, elizabeth.james@sydney.edu.au
Fady Aoun, fady.aoun@sydney.edu.au
Coel Kirkby, coel.kirkby@sydney.edu.au
Jesse Cunningham, jesse.cunningham@sydney.edu.au
Pallavi Sinha, pallavi.sinha@sydney.edu.au
Christopher Rudge, christopher.rudge@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Participation hurdle task Unstructured participation
Participation
10% Ongoing n/a
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO6 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
Presentation hurdle task Case presentation
Case presentation
20% Ongoing n/a
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
In-semester test hurdle task In-semester exam
Written exam
70% Week 05 3 hours
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
hurdle task = hurdle task ?

Assessment summary

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

  • Completely answers the question.
  • Contains striking originality of approach or analysis.
  • Demonstrates exhaustive or innovative research (where independent research required).
  • Exceptionally well written, structured and expressed.
  • Is otherwise exceptional in some way.

Distinction

75 - 84

  • Completely answers the question.
  • Achieves a critical and evaluative approach to the issues.
  • Content and structure is well organised in support of the argument.
  • Demonstrates extensive research and analysis to support a well-documented argument.
  • Generally well expressed and free from errors.
  • Has a clear structure and is well articulated.

Credit

65 - 74

  • Covers main issues fairly well in answering the question.
  • Contains no significant errors.
  • Demonstrates an attempted critical approach to the issues.
  • Demonstrates reasonably sound research and analysis in addressing the key issues.
  • Has a clear structure and reasonably clear expression.

Pass

50 - 64

  • Identifies the key issues, but does not follow through with a reasoned argument.
  • Contains some significant errors.
  • Displays satisfactory engagement with the key issues.
  • Offers a descriptive summary of material relevant to the question.
  • Superficial use of material, and may display a tendency to paraphrase.
  • Demonstrates little evidence of in-depth research or analysis.
  • Adequate expression.
  • Overall, demonstrates the minimum level of competence in the assessment and satisfies the requirements to proceed to higher-level studies in the degree or subject area.

Fail

0 - 49

  • Does not answer the question.
  • Contains significant or numerous errors.
  • Few or no identifiable arguments.
  • Content that is inappropriate or irrelevant.
  • Lack of research or analysis.
  • Difficult or impossible to understand through poor grammar, expression or structure.
  • Overall, does not demonstrate the minimum level of competence in the assessment.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week -01 Introduction to the Australian legal system and a short history of the development of Australian law. Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Introduction to law study. Case study Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Sources of law in Australia Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Law, morality and custom. Law and social values. The rule of law. Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Case law and precedent Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Case law and precedent. Legal change. Native title. Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Case law and precedent Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Separation of powers. Federal and State legislative powers. Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Case law and precedent II Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 01 Statutory interpretation I Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Statutory interpretation I Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Statutes and interaction with case law. Legal change and law reform. Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Statutory interpretation II Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Problem solving, IRAC method, Applying Precedents Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Critical Thinking, Academic Integrity Issues, Surviving and Thriving at Law School. Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 02 Case presentations. Topics for discussion: Issues in law Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 03 Case presentations. Topics for discussion: Judges; judicial reasoning and activism; legal change and law reform. Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 04 Case analysis practice exam Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 05 Summing up on key issues. Preparation for assessments Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6

Attendance and class requirements

  • Attendance:  Students are expected to attend all lectures and all seminars in this unit. Further, University rules provide that students who fail to attend 70% of classes will not satisfy the pass requirements for any unit of study. Failure to meet this requirement may result in a student being precluded from sitting the final assessment, and being discontinued from the unit of study, resulting in an Absent Fail or Discontinue - Fail grade. 
  • Word count: A piece of assessment which exceeds the prescribed word limit will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment for every 100 words, or part thereof. The total word count for essay and other written assessments will exclude: bibliography; footnote numbers; footnote citation; cover page and include: body text; headings and sub-headings; quotations; anything other than numbers and citations in footnotes.
  • Referencing: The Sydney Law School expects you to use the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (4th edition, 2018) for your footnoting style, although you should confirm this with your lecturer. A link to the library website, where this is comprehensively set out, is available at https://libguides.library.usyd.edu.au.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

All readings for this unit can be accessed through the Library eReserve, available on Canvas.

  • Catriona Cook, Robin Creyke, Robert Geddes, David Hamer & Tristan Taylor, Laying Down the Law (LexisNexis Butterworths, 10th ed, 2018). Available online or from Glebebooks.

  • Foundations of Law (Juris Doctor) 2020 Reading Materials, available from the University Copy Centre in the Sydney University Sports and Aquatic Centre, Maze Crescent, Darlington.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. demonstrate a basic understanding of the Australian legal system and sources of law in Australia
  • LO2. demonstrate a basic understanding of how law is made or changed by case law and legislation in the context of social changes
  • LO3. demonstrate a basic understanding of the interaction of judge made law and statutes and of the courts, the parliament and the executive.
  • LO4. demonstrate a basic understanding of the principles of judicial reasoning and statutory interpretation
  • LO5. develop skills of comprehending and critically analysing primary and secondary materials in law
  • LO6. develop skills of oral and written analysis and communication about legal issues

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

This unit has been continuously developed, taking into account student feedback in previous years.

Teacher consultation guidelines: Please contact lecturer in class or by email. Please use your university of Sydney email address, not a
private email address. Students should provide their student identification number and their full name when corresponding with academic staff.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.