Skip to main content
Unit outline_

LAWS5201: Theories of the State

Semester 2, 2022 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

What are states? Should we have them? This unit of study seeks to enable critical reflection on (i) various conceptions of the state and (ii) various arguments for and against it.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Law
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
LAWS3501
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Kevin Walton, kevin.walton@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Participation Class participation
Class participation
20% Ongoing N/A
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO3 LO2
Assignment Short Essay
Essay
20% Week 06
Due date: 09 Sep 2022 at 12:00

Closing date: 31 Oct 2022
1500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3
Assignment Research essay
Essay
60% Week 13
Due date: 04 Nov 2022 at 12:00

Closing date: 31 Dec 2022
4000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4

Assessment summary

Class participation (20 marks): Students receive a mark out of ten for leading class discussion in a specific week. In the particular week to which they are assigned, students are on call, which means that they should be ready to raise their own and answer others’ (including the teacher’s) questions about the required reading. 

Students also receive a mark out of ten for the questions and comments about the required reading that they submit on Canvas throughout the semester either before or just after the class in which the reading is examined. 

Short essay (20 marks): Students must write a short essay in which they reflect on (that is, make an argument about) an aspect of the required reading for one of the first ten seminars. They must not write about the reading for a week in which they led the class discussion. The short essay (1500 words) is due at noon on Friday 9 September 2022. These readings will be available at least two weeks before the commencement of classes. 

Research essay (60 marks): Each student must submit a research essay. This essay (4000 words) should demonstrate critical engagement with a relevant topic based on independent research. Students must either answer one of the questions provided by the teacher or write on a subject of their own choice (to which the teacher has agreed). Students are permitted to write a research essay on a similar topic to their short essay or the week in which they led the class discussion (subject to the policy on academic dishonesty). Topics will be available on Monday 12 September 2022. The research essay is due at noon on Friday 4 November 2022. 

Students must retain pre-submitted drafts of their assessments on file.

Word-limits: The total word-count for written work excludes the title-page, citations in footnotes and any bibliography, but includes everything else, such as headings, sub-headings, quotations (including epigraphs) and, even if it does not seem substantive, anything other than citations in footnotes. Failure to comply with the word-limit is penalised at a rate of 5% of the total mark for the assignment for every 100 words in excess of the limit. A research essay of 4099 words, for example, is not penalised, but a paper of 4100 words loses three marks. Penalties for excessive length are strictly applied.

A student who does not make a genuine attempt at all assessment tasks – class participation, short essay, and research essay – will receive an Absent Fail grade.

Assessment criteria

A High Distinction (85-100) indicates work of an exceptional standard, a Distinction (75-84) a very high standard, a Credit (65-74) a good standard, and a Pass (50-64) an acceptable standard

The mark for class-participation is determined using the following grid:

  Exceptional Very high Good Acceptable Unacceptable
Comprehension          
Analysis          
Extent of input          

The mark for the short essay is determined using the following grid:

  Exceptional Very high Good Acceptable Unacceptable
Comprehension          
Analysis          
Structure          
Expression          

The mark for the research essay is determined using the following grid:

  Exceptional Very high Good Acceptable Unacceptable
Comprehension          
Analysis          
Structure          
Expression          
Research          

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

A student who has not obtained an extension by applying successfully for Special Consideration will be penalised for late submission of written work at a rate of 5% of the total mark for the assignment per day or part-day (including weekends and public holidays). Subject to a ten-minute grace-period, penalties for late submission will be strictly applied. This means that three marks will be deducted from a research essay submitted at eleven minutes past noon on the due-date (or revised due-date).

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction and Skinner Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 02 Hobbes Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 03 Locke Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 04 Hume Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 05 Rousseau Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 07 Nozick Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 08 Pateman and Mills Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 10 Godwin and Bakunin Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 11 Kropotkin and Gandhi Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 12 Goldman and Rothbard Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance: Students are required to attend at least 70% of classes. Students who fail to attend at least 70% of classes will receive an Absent Fail grade unless granted an exemption by the teacher.

Teaching and Learning Strategy: Seminars are discussion-based. Students must prepare for each seminar by reading and reflecting on designated texts. Participation in class discussions enables students to develop their understanding of and their ability to think critically about the issues with which the texts are concerned.

Referencing Requirements: When citing material in written work, students should rely consistently on an accepted method, such as that specified in The Australian Guide to Legal Citation (4th ed).

 

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

The required readings are available electronically through the Canvas site.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Demonstrate knowledge of theories of the state.
  • LO2. Analyse theories of the state.
  • LO3. Present orally and in writing theories of the state.
  • LO4. Research theories of the state.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

The teacher welcomes student feedback on this unit of study.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.