Skip to main content
Unit outline_

LAWS7001: Legal Research 2

Semester 2, 2024 [Normal evening] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

The unit will cover the following topics: higher degree by research students, supervisors and the School; refining your thesis - lessons from the strategy; developing/locating your thesis - lessons from the strategy; comparative law techniques; using international law materials; using historical materials/methods; conceptualising and researching the law in action; narratives, interviews, case-studies and other 'selective' forms of analysis; quantitative research methods - common pitfalls; quantitative research methods - forms of presentation and analysis; current problems in research and presentation; current problems II; and overview and review.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Law
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
LAWS6077
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Terry Carney, terry.carney@sydney.edu.au
The census date for this unit availability is 2 September 2024
Type Description Weight Due Length
Participation Class participation (0%)
Class participation
0% Ongoing Ongoing
Outcomes assessed: LO3 LO2
Assignment Thesis re-statement exercise (10%)
Written assignment
10% Week 05
Due date: 28 Aug 2024 at 18:00

Closing date: 28 Aug 2024
Maximum 1000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO3 LO2
Dissertation Thesis chapter of core argument (80%)
Thesis chapter
80% Week 06
Due date: 28 Mar 2025 at 20:00

Closing date: 28 Mar 2025
At least chapter length
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO3 LO4 LO1
Short release assignment Plain writing task (10%)
Short writing exercise
10% Week 11
Due date: 16 Oct 2024 at 18:00

Closing date: 16 Oct 2024
Maximum 500 words / 5 working days
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO3
Assignment Synopsis (0%)
A short synopsis of what is proposed for the thesis chapter.
0% Week 13
Due date: 30 Oct 2024 at 20:00

Closing date: 30 Oct 2024
Maximum 250 words
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO3 LO1 LO4

Assessment summary

Class participation (Non-weighted): Candidates’ interaction with their peers in scholarly contexts is an essential component of LAWS7001 and involves preparing for seminars in advance by completing set readings, leading discussion, eliciting the experiences and opinions of others, and soliciting solutions to common issues.

Candidate’s participation demonstrates their ability to communicate (ULO3) and requires them to leverage peer support in addressing issues (ULO2).  

Thesis re-statement task (10%): Candidates must re-state their thesis's core argument and describe its structure, in a maximum 1000-word outline. This outline is due at 6.00PM Wednesday 28 August 2024 (Sydney, Australia time) and must be submitted via Canvas. Further instructions and guidance will be provided in class. 

The thesis restatement asks candidates to apply the conventions of academic and legal writing (ULO3) to developing and sustaining an argument (ULO2). 

Plain writing task (10%): Candidates are required to rewrite a maximum 500-word excerpt, concentrating on clarity while maintaining accuracy and ensuring the original meaning and stance is retained. The excerpt will be released to candidates at 9.00AM 09 October 2024 (Sydney, Australia time) on the unit Canvas site and is due at 6.00PM 16 October 2024 (Sydney, Australia time) and must be submitted via Canvas. Further instructions and guidance will be provided in class. 

Rewriting the excerpt supports candidates to highlight a main argument (ULO2), apply academic and legal writing skills (ULO 3) 

Core Argument chapter draft (80%): There are two [2] parts to this assessment task: 

  1. A short (non-weighted, maximum 250 words) synopsis of what is proposed in terms of the thesis chapter. This must be submitted for approval before 8.00PM 30 October 2024 (Sydney, Australia time) and must be submitted via Canvas. 
  2. The principal assessment task in this unit is to prepare a near-complete draft of a thesis chapter that best articulates the basis of a candidate’s core argument, its relationship to previous research, and the structure of the analysis. This late draft is due by 8.00PM on 28 March 2025.   

Further instructions and guidance will be provided in class. 

This task aims to encourage deep-level substantive work on issues at the core of the thesis topic (ULO1, ULO2) and communicate the core argument professionally and in scholarly contexts (ULO3, UL4). 

Word Count penalty: No word count penalties apply. Assessment tasks are tailored to a candidate's core argument chapter or involve short tasks (thesis restatement and plain language tasks) requiring economy of language.

Use of editors or proof-readers: In completing unsupervised assessments, students may use editors, proof-readers, and automated writing tools (including translation software, grammar checkers, reference generators and artificial intelligence), provided that all use is acknowledged and consistent with University policies and procedures including Academic Integrity Policy. Acknowledgment must be made in writing on the front of the work submitted for assessment, or in an appropriate footnote or other reference, and state the name of the person or software.  

Assessment requirements to pass a unit of study: A student must make a genuine attempt at all assessment tasks set out in this Unit of Study in order to obtain a Pass mark and grade (or above); otherwise an Absent Fail grade will be recorded as the student’s result for this Unit of Study. 

Assessment criteria

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of clear HDR standard, a distinction a very high HDR standard, a credit a good HDR standard but with significant work needed, and a pass a less than acceptable standard.  All grades need to be understood in the context of the detailed written feedback provided when material is returned to the candidate with that grade attached

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

Work receiving a high distinction grade will exhibit the characteristic that it demonstrates very strong HDR thesis level performance (for the requisite thesis level) and/or confidence in thesis planning and execution, including but not limited to:
• its originality of thesis argument, methodological approach and analysis.
• its exhaustive or innovative research.
• its high proportion of publishable quality writing.

Distinction

75 - 84

Work receiving a distinction grade will generally exhibit high level attainment of or potential to reach all qualities relevant to the HDR thesis in question, but will have identified deficiencies that require to be rectified in order confidently to be assured of realising those qualities in the final thesis.

Credit

65 - 74

Work receiving a credit grade will generally reflect retention of confidence that a viable HDR thesis of the requisite standard is ultimately realisable, but that serious and potentially fatal deficiencies currently appear across one or more relevant thesis attributes, the rectification of which is vital.

Pass

50 - 64

Work receiving a pass grade will lack sufficient evidence of doctoral qualities or potential to achieve those standards in the future as to call for fundamental reconsideration, development of capacities or other quite major improvements in a thesis that on current indications is headed towards failure at assessment.  The pass grade is applied because the unit is a support seminar and the grade indications and other advice provided during the course are designed to enable the candidate to regain the qualities relevant to HDR level thesis work

Fail

0 - 49

A fail grade, which would effectively require repeating of the unit, and perhaps termination or suspension of candidature, is rarely ever considered.  Instead a very low pass grade is the preferred way of conveying that assessment to the candidate.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

The late submission of an assignment task will not attract a mark reduction by way of a penalty but, depending on the delay, a late thesis chapter may need to be submitted in the next teaching of the subject (with the unit result being withheld in the meantime). Students should contact Professor Carney if they are unable to submit an assignment on time.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Support for students

The Support for Students Policy 2023 reflects the University’s commitment to supporting students in their academic journey and making the University safe for students. It is important that you read and understand this policy so that you are familiar with the range of support services available to you and understand how to engage with them.

The University uses email as its primary source of communication with students who need support under the Support for Students Policy 2023. Make sure you check your University email regularly and respond to any communications received from the University.

Learning resources and detailed information about weekly assessment and learning activities can be accessed via Canvas. It is essential that you visit your unit of study Canvas site to ensure you are up to date with all of your tasks.

If you are having difficulties completing your studies, or are feeling unsure about your progress, we are here to help. You can access the support services offered by the University at any time:

Support and Services (including health and wellbeing services, financial support and learning support)
Course planning and administration
Meet with an Academic Adviser

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 1. Introduction to the unit; 2. Refining/locating your thesis: What is your thesis? Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO4
Week 02 Higher degree research: coping with a thesis, and the supervisor/student dynamic Seminar (2 hr) LO2
Week 03 Kinds of writing in a thesis: what are the different ‘kinds’ of writing and what ‘work’ do they do in a thesis? Seminar (2 hr) LO3
Week 04 Methodological calibration 1: differing degrees of sophistication of comparative methods: how do we choose the correct "depth"? Seminar (2 hr) LO1
Week 05 Methodological calibration 2: differing levels of historical methodology: matching methods to tasks Seminar (2 hr) LO1
Week 06 Problem-solving in dissertation writing 1 Seminar (2 hr) LO2
Week 07 Evaluating thesis data: what are the lessons to draw from evaluating legal institutions or law in action? Seminar (2 hr) LO1
Week 08 Problem-solving in dissertation writing 2 Seminar (2 hr) LO2
Week 09 The “shape” of the thesis: does your thesis differ from the science model Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO3
Week 10 Clear legal writing workshop Seminar (2 hr) LO3
Week 11 Writing up: logistical and psychological challenges of achieving timely completions Seminar (2 hr) LO2
Week 12 Good beginnings: challenges of writing compelling opening and closing paragraphs Seminar (2 hr) LO3
Week 13 Overview Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance: All students are required to attend at least 70% of classes to satisfy the pass requirements for each unit of study. Failure to meet this requirement may result in a student being precluded from undertaking the final assessment. 

Referencing: The Sydney Law School expects you to use the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (4th edition, 2018) for your footnoting style, although you should confirm this with your lecturer. A link to the library website where this is set out comprehensively is available at Referencing and Citation Styles: AGLC4. 

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Please refer to the Reading List in Canvas.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Develop a sophisticated central argument in an HDR thesis that demonstrates mastery of accepted conventions of research writing, sustained and supported by the critical evaluation selection and use of relevant primary, secondary, scholarly, and professional sources.
  • LO2. Identify and leverage Higher Degree by Research (HDR) supervisory support and other resources effectively to solve problems innovatively, anticipate logistical issues, manage time, and address emotional challenges encountered during thesis preparation.
  • LO3. Apply advanced legal and academic communication skills to prepare a logically structured thesis encompassing effective introductions, coherent linking of material, and presenting a balanced argument.
  • LO4. Complete a final draft of a chapter containing the core argument(s) of a thesis, focusing on clarity, coherence, and critical analysis demonstrating advanced progress towards completion.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Unchanged

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.