Group Submissions:

Teams will be required to complete provided templates for each of the following in weeks 2, 4 and 5.

• Benefit Realization Map
• Status Report
• Change Request

Submissions will be due 48 hours following the weekly Workshop. 

Individual Submissions:

Individuals, working within teams, will be required to complete provided templates for each of the following in weeks 3 and 6.  

• Benefits Register
• Project Charter and WBS

Individual work will be compiled and submitted at group level but marked individually.

Final Presentation

Students will form groups, each responsible for a program within the Bradfield City Portfolio.  Within each program, individuals will be responsible for a specific sub-project.  Each group will deliver a combined pre-recorded presentation, with each member speaking individually (and marked individually) on the Project Charter and Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) for their selected project within the group's program. The presentation needs to provide an understanding to the panel as to how each of the five projects in each groups's program are individually achieving some or all of the state-level objectives and how they link to other projects or programs in the Bradfield City Portfolio.

Personal Reflective Journals

Individual submissions of up to reflecting on your agency's presentation in class, and commenting on:
1)    How your work on the weekly topic can be improved, or altered based on the group discussion.
2)    Your key takeaway from the discussion on the weekly topic?

The final submission will require reflection on your agency's presentation in class, and response to one of the questions asked by the panel following your agency's presentation.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO ASSESSMENT

Use of Generative AI:

At the University of Sydney, the use of generative AI for learning is permitted, however, use in assessments is prohibited unless explicitly allowed by your unit coordinator.

Your coordinator will let you know at the beginning of semester whether use of generative AI tools is permitted in their unit for assessment purposes. This means, if your unit coordinator has not addressed use of generative AI, you are not permitted to do so for the purposes of assessment.

Text-matching software for Assignment Submission:

As part of the assessment process, text matching software such as Turnitin may be used to identify plagiarism and/or be used for providing feedback.

Confidential Peer Evaluation:

As part of the group contribution assessment process, collaborative & self-peer evaluation tools (e.g. SparkPlus, CATME, etc.) may be used, either on a confidential or non-confidential basis, to understand contributions and interactions amongst group members. Marks may be adjusted for an individual team member, following on from the peer evaluation process.

Reliability of Canvas Marks:

Canvas will be used in this unit and while key assessments may be submitted via Canvas, it cannot be used to determine/ predict a student’s final marks in this unit. Not all assessment results may be visible to students and group/team marks can change for each individual team member based on the peer-evaluations conducted at the end of the semester.

Recycling Assignments Not Allowed:

Recycling involves submitting (or resubmitting) your own work that has already been assessed without the permission of the lecturer of this unit, and for which you have already been given feedback. Recycling is a form of academic dishonesty and will be handled in line with the coursework policy.

Mark Moderation:

There may be statistically defensible moderation when combining the marks from each component to ensure consistency of marking between markers, and alignment of final grades with unit outcomes.