Skip to main content
Unit outline_

ANHS3635: Historiography Ancient and Modern

Semester 2, 2021 [Normal day] - Remote

Historical consciousness is only one of many differentpathways to understanding the past, one closely associated with the development of 'History' as a literary genre in Ancient Greece. How did this mode of understanding the human past emerge and come to dominate our thinking about past events and processes?What does it mean to explain the past 'historically'? How has history developed its explanations of the actions, behaviours and thoughts of human beings in the past from the Enlightenment to the present? This unit explores the 'history of History' by offering a toolkit for making sense of the wide range of theoretical positions which support historical explanations.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Classics and Ancient History
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
12 credit points at 2000 level in Ancient History or 12 credit points at 2000 level in History
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
ANHS2691 or ANHS2692 or ANHS2612
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Ben Brown, benjamin.brown@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Presentation Student-led Seminar
n/a
20% - 800 words
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO8 LO5 LO4 LO3
Online task Writing journal/online discussion board
n/a
30% Multiple weeks 1200 words
Outcomes assessed: LO3 LO14 LO12 LO10 LO8 LO6 LO4
Participation Tutorial participation
n/a
10% Ongoing Cumulative across Semester
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO14 LO13 LO12 LO11 LO10 LO9 LO8 LO7 LO6 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
Assignment Research essay
n/a
40% Week 12 2500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO6 LO8 LO9 LO10 LO12 LO14

Assessment summary

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a High distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a Distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

 

Distinction

75 - 84

 

Credit

65 - 74

 

Pass

50 - 64

 

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

 

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction: The stakes of the past Lecture (2 hr)  
T1 Introduction: what do we expect the past to be? Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 02 The form of the past in Archaic Greece Lecture (2 hr)  
T2 The prehistory of historiography in Early Greece Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 03 Herodotus Lecture (2 hr)  
T3 Herodotus: Ionian historia Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 04 Thucydides Lecture (2 hr)  
T4 Thucydides: Experiencing the Past Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 05 History Re-founded: the Enlightenment, Romanticism; Nietzsche's critique Lecture (2 hr)  
T5 The Romantic Critique of History: from Herder to Nietzsche (via von Ranke) Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 06 Radically rethinking the past I: Marx Lecture (2 hr)  
T6 Marx and Class: the engine of history Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 07 Radically rethinking the past II: Weber Lecture (2 hr)  
T7 Weber, Rationality and Historical Sociology Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 08 Rethinking history and culture: Structuralism, anthropology and the social sciences Lecture (2 hr)  
T8 Structuralism and the Annales: Synchrony not Diachrony, Processes not Events Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 09 Western Marxism: Gramsci and Critical Theory Lecture (2 hr)  
T9 Two legacies of Marx: Antonio Gramsci and Walter Benjamin's 'On the Concept of History' Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 10 Rupture and thought: Foucault Lecture (2 hr)  
T10 Foucault: how does power work? Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 11 History and the Other Lecture (2 hr)  
T11 Feminism, history and post-humanism Tutorial (1 hr)  
Week 12 The content of the form: Hayden White Lecture (2 hr)  
T12 Metahistory: Style, literature and fiction Tutorial (1 hr)  

Attendance and class requirements

  • Attendance: According to Faculty Board Resolutions, students in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences are expected to attend 90% of their classes. If you attend less than 50% of classes, regardless of the reasons, you may be referred to the Examiner’s Board. The Examiner’s Board will decide whether you should pass or fail the unit of study if your attendance falls below this threshold.
  • Lecture recording: Most lectures (in recording-equipped venues) will be recorded and may be made available to students on the LMS. However, you should not rely on lecture recording to substitute your classroom learning experience.
  • Preparation: Students should commit to spend approximately three hours’ preparation time (reading, studying, homework, essays, etc.) for every hour of scheduled instruction.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

All readings for this unit can be accessed on the Library eReserve link available on Canvas.

  • Herodotus (Penguin Classics)
  • Thucydides (Penguin Classics)

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. demonstrate knowledge of the philosophy and practice of history and the ability to apply it to the critique and creation of historical writing
  • LO2. communicate this knowledge effectively in written and oral English
  • LO3. demonstrate an awareness of the characteristics of scholarly debate on various approaches to history and engage with it in a critical, reasoned and independent manner
  • LO4. demonstrate an awareness of the problematic nature of many familiar concepts and of ways in which such problems have been addressed
  • LO5. demonstrate the ability to work collaboratively to create knowledge with tolerance and integrity
  • LO6. demonstrate an awareness of the use and abuse of history as part of the use and abuse of knowledge of all kinds
  • LO7. reflect on the nature of historical knowledge and the relevance of history in the 21st century
  • LO8. demonstrate conceptual historiographic awareness and skills as an integral step in the overall teaching and learning of advanced students in the ancient history major
  • LO9. demonstrate a nuanced understanding of the connections between history, philosophy and the natural and social sciences in the production of knowledge
  • LO10. demonstrate a working knowledge of the major theoretical approaches in historiography
  • LO11. demonstrate an awareness of cross-cultural issues by examining the nature of history within different cultures
  • LO12. demonstrate the ability to examine history as part of a complex intellectual domain and use it to engage with familiar contexts and assumptions
  • LO13. demonstrate an awareness of the ethical issues in the writing of history
  • LO14. reflect critically on the nature of history and, therefore, on the nature of instituted knowledge of any kind.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

No changes have been made since this unit was last offered

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.