Outline

Overview

This Unit explores the sculpture, built environment (architecture, wall-painting, mosaics), and pottery of Greece and Rome across a 1, 000 year period between 750BC and the 3rd century AD. Hands-on tutorials in the Chau Chak Wing Museum provide students with the wonderful opportunity to handle and work directly with ancient Greek and Roman artefacts in the University's collection.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit	Archaeology
Credit points	6
Prerequisites ?	12 credit points at 1000 level of Archaeology or 12 credit points at 1000 level of Ancient History or 6 credit points at 1000 level of Archaeology and 6 credit points 1000 level of Ancient History or ARHT1001 plus 6 credit points at 1000 level of Archaeology or Ancient History
Corequisites ?	None
Prohibitions ?	None
Assumed knowledge ?	None
Available to study abroad and exchange students	Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator	Lesley Beaumont, lesley.beaumont@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s)	Hugh Thomas, hugh.thomas@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s)	Lesley Beaumont, lesley.beaumont@sydney.edu.au

Type	Description	Weight	Due	Length
Supervised exam ?	Examination 90 minute exam comprised of image and short-answer questions	35%	Formal exam period	1.5 hours
Outcomes assessed:
Presentation	Tutorial presentation Oral presentation on Museum artefact or ancient monument	15%	Multiple weeks	10 minute
Outcomes assessed:
Assignment	Essay 2,000 word essay	50%	Week 09 Due date: 06 Oct 2023 at 23:59	2,000 words
Outcomes assessed:

Assessment summary

Exam: students will sit a 1.5 hour exam in the formal exam period. The exam will comprise image and short-answer questions on the course content.

Tutorial presentation: students will make a 10-minute oral presentation on a Museum object or monument. Students will be allocated a specific week in which to make their presentation.

Essay: students will write a 2,000 word essay on a question chosen from a list of topics on architecture, wall-painting, mosaic, sculpture and ceramics.

Detailed information about each assessment task will be made available on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

Essay Grading

This unit uses standards referenced assessment for award of assessment marks. Students’ assessment will be evaluated solely on the basis of students’ achievement against criteria and standards specified to align with learning outcomes. For reference to criteria and standards, please consult the following grade descriptors for Archaeology.

High Distinction (85-100%)

An authoritative and highly effective response that engages with the full implications of the question. The issues and methodology are set out clearly, critical arguments are exceptionally well-developed, and there is a clear and complete understanding of the material and vocabulary/terminology. Case studies will relate directly to the question. Evidence is provided of wide-ranging and insightful use of relevant literature, some of which has been located by the student. A considerable degree of independent thought and interpretation is demonstrated, as is an understanding of the full nature and complexity of archaeological data, methodologies and interpretation. The conclusion expresses the candidate's independent judgment in a mature way. Expression is efficient and lucid, without unnecessary complication; in the highest range of this grade expression will be scholarly and elegant. Faultless presentation of citations and bibliography; judicious use of academic conventions.

Distinction (75-84%)

A sharply-focussed answer that engages with many of the implications of the question and maintains a sophisticated level of analysis throughout. The problem(s) and method of approach are set out clearly, and different arguments are presented critically, with a good understanding of the material and vocabulary/terminology. Case studies will relate clearly to the question. Critical use of relevant literature is made, showing ability to make comparisons between different secondary interpretations and to quote/reference aptly. A considerable degree of independent thought is demonstrated, and an understanding of the nature and complexity of archaeological data, methodologies and interpretation. The assignment concludes with a synthesis which is not just a summary, and shows some independence of view. Accurate and lucid English expression is evident, with very few errors of form or style. Appropriate use of citations and bibliography.

Credit (65-74%)

An essay that engages with the question effectively and concisely. The structure of the essay will be clear and will develop a critical argument, using an appropriate range of vocabulary. Case studies will be used and evaluated. Use of relevant literature will show an ability to make comparisons between different interpretations and to quote/reference aptly. The essay will demonstrate some intellectual independence, perhaps drawing on ideas from outside the course; it will show an awareness of the nature and complexity of archaeological data, methodologies and interpretation. The conclusion will summarise the position argued and show some critical awareness of relevant issues. A good standard of written English is maintained, with few errors of form or style. Appropriate use of citations and bibliography.

Pass (50-64%)

Sound and competent work which covers the basic subject matter and which understands the question. The structure of the essay will be evident and will show a critical argument, using an appropriate range of vocabulary. Case studies will be used and discussed. Use and reference of several sources, but mainly through summary rather than analysis and comparison. There will be limited evidence of original thought; the essay may suggest an awareness of the nature and complexity of archaeological data, methodologies and interpretation. The conclusion will summarise the position argued. Moderately good English expression, with room for improvement in matters of style and/or grammar and punctuation; some errors and/or omissions in citation and bibliography.

Fail (less than 50%)

An essay that may not fully understand the question, that may include factual errors and that does not use the appropriate vocabulary. Case studies may be inappropriate or not used. Limited use of secondary sources and no critical comparison of them. The essay will demonstrate no direct evidence of original thought, and little or no awareness of the nature and complexity of archaeological data, methodologies and interpretation. The assignment deals with some of the relevant issues but treats them superficially and is too descriptive. Unsophisticated writing with errors of grammar, syntax, spelling and punctuation; may use inappropriate or inaccurate language. Limited bibliography and/or inconsistent citation.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

Penalty for late submission of the essay will be 5% of the maximum awardable mark for each calendar day after the due date.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Learning support

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Weekly schedule

WK	Topic	Learning activity
Week 01	Lecture 1: Introduction to the course Lecture 2: Historical context	Lecture (2 hr)
Week 02	Lecture 3: Methodological & theoretical approaches to the ancient built environment Lecture 4: Greek & Roman urban planning and architectural materials Tutorial: Assessment Tasks	Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)
Week 03	Lecture 5: Greek civic architecture Lecture 6: Roman civic architecture Tutorial: Civic architecture	Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)
Week 04	Lecture 7: Greek sacred architecture Lecture 8: Roman sacred architecture Tutorial: Sacred architecture	Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)
Week 05	Lecture 9: Greek domestic architecture Lecture 10: Roman domestic architecture Tutorial: Domestic architecture	Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)
Week 06	Lecture 11: Greek wall painting Lecture 12: Roman wall painting Tutorial: Wall painting	Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)
Week 07	Lecture 13: Greek mosaic Lecture 14: Roman mosaic Tutorial: Mosaic	Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)
Week 08	Lecture 15: Methodological & theoretical approaches to ancient sculpture. Sculpture as expression of the social ideal Lecture 16: The functions, forms and materials of ancient sculpture Tutorial: Sculpture	Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)
Week 09	Lecture 17: Greek sculpture Lecture 18: Greek sculpture Tutorial: Greek sculpture	Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)
Week 10	Lecture 19: Roman sculpture Lecture 20: Roman sculpture Tutorial: Roman sculpture	Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)
Week 11	Lecture 21: Methodological & theoretical approaches to ancient ceramics. Ancient ceramic technology Lecture 22: Greek ceramics-Late Geometric & Orientalising Tutorial: Greek ceramics	Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)
Week 13	Lecture 23: Greek ceramics - black figure Lecture 24: Greek ceramics - red figure Tutorial: Greek ceramics	Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)
Week 13	Lecture 25: Hellenistic & Roman ceramics Lecture 26: Retrospective overview & exam preparation Tutorial: Hellenistic & Roman ceramics	Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)

Attendance and class requirements

In-person attendance is required at all tutorials - tutorials will not be recorded.

In-person attendance at lectures is strongly recommended. Lectures will be recorded.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Learning outcomes

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

Outcomes
Graduate qualities

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

LO1. 1. Demonstrate a firm understanding of the framework of development evidenced by Greek and Roman sculpture, architecture, wall-painting, mosaic and ceramics between 750BC and the third century AD.
LO2. 2. Understand relevant archaeological approaches and methodologies utilised in the study of ancient sculpture, architecture, wall-painting, mosaic and ceramics.
LO3. 3. Apply theoretical knowledge to practical contexts, particularly through first-hand investigation of Greek and Roman artefacts in the Chau Chak Wing Museum.
LO4. 4. Demonstrate an ability to work interactively with others in the tutorial context.
LO5. 5. Demonstrate an improved capacity to access, organise and communicate knowledge and a considered opinion in written and spoken English.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1	Depth of disciplinary expertise Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.
GQ2	Critical thinking and problem solving Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.
GQ3	Oral and written communication Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.
GQ4	Information and digital literacy Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.
GQ5	Inventiveness Generating novel ideas and solutions.
GQ6	Cultural competence Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.
GQ7	Interdisciplinary effectiveness Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.
GQ8	Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.
GQ9	Influence Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes	Graduate qualities
Learning outcomes

Responding to student feedback

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

This is a new Unit of Study

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.

Current students

Overview

Overview

Unit details and rules

Teaching staff

Assessment

Assessment

Assessment summary

Assessment criteria

Late submission

Academic integrity

Learning support

Learning support

Simple extensions

Special consideration

Using AI responsibly

Weekly schedule

Weekly schedule

Attendance and class requirements

Study commitment

Learning outcomes

Learning outcomes

Graduate qualities

Outcome map

Responding to student feedback

Responding to student feedback

Disclaimer

On this page

Useful links

Media

Student links

About us

Connect

Current students

ARCO2107: Greek and Roman Art and Archaeology

Semester 2, 2023 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

Overview

Overview

Unit details and rules

Teaching staff

Assessment

Assessment

Assessment summary

Assessment criteria

Late submission

Academic integrity

Learning support

Learning support

Simple extensions

Special consideration

Using AI responsibly

Weekly schedule

Weekly schedule

Attendance and class requirements

Study commitment

Learning outcomes

Learning outcomes

Graduate qualities

Outcome map

Responding to student feedback

Responding to student feedback

Disclaimer

On this page

Useful links

Media

Student links

About us

Connect