Skip to main content
Unit outline_

COMP5703: Information Technology Capstone Project

Semester 2, 2023 [Supervision] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

The Information Technology Capstone project provides an opportunity for students to carry out a defined piece of independent research or design. These skills include the capacity to define a research or design question, show how it relates to existing knowledge and carry out the research or design in a systematic manner. Students will be expected to choose a research/development project that demonstrates their prior learning in their advanced IT specialist domain (MIT) or the management of IT (MITM) or both technical and IT management domains (MIT/MITM) or in the data science domain (MDS). The results will be presented in a final project presentation and report. It is not expected that the project outcomes from this unit will represent a significant contribution to new knowledge. The unit aims to provide students with the opportunity to carry out a defined piece of independent investigative research or design work in a setting and manner that fosters the development of IT/DS skills in research or design.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Computer Science
Credit points 12
Prerequisites
? 
A candidate for the MIT, MITM or MIT / MITM who has completed 24 credit points from Core, Specialist or Foundation units of study may take this unit
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
COMP5702 OR COMP5704 OR COMP5707 OR COMP5708 OR COMP5709
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Xi Wu, xi.wu@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment group assignment Project Proposal
Individual weekly report on week 3,4,5; Group proposal report on week 5
10% Multiple weeks Individual: 5 pages, Group: 15 pages
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO4
Assignment group assignment Progress Report
Individual weekly report on week 6,7,8; Group progress report on week 9
10% Multiple weeks Individual: 5 pages; Group: 15 pages
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO6
Assignment group assignment Final Report/Deliverable
Individual weekly report from week 9 to 13; Group final report on week 15
70% Multiple weeks Maximum 50 pages in length
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Presentation hurdle task group assignment Presentation
Group presentation
10% STUVAC Recording:10-15 minutes; Q&A: 15 minutes
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Assignment hurdle task group assignment End-Semester Project Evaluation
Evaluating the project final status with clients
0% STUVAC Evaluation form provided
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO6 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
Assignment hurdle task group assignment Mid-Semester Project Status Checking
Checking the project status with clients
0% Week 08 Checking form provided
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO4 LO2
hurdle task = hurdle task ?
group assignment = group assignment ?

Assessment summary

  • Assessment Overview: The Information Technology Capstone project can be in performed in teams of 5-6 group members. Groups are supervised by tutors. A mark for project proposal, progress report, presentation and final report/deliverable, respectively, consists of both individual component and group component.
  • Individual Weekly Report: An individual weekly report of around 5 pages is required from week 3 to week 13. Each team member delivers a report including their own contribution as well as reporting on group collaboration.
  • Proposal and Progress Report *: Group project proposal and group progress report of around 15 pages is required that includes problem/task specification, literature survey, proposed methodology, expected outcomes, progress and proposed timeline.
  • Presentation *: Each student will be required to participate in an oral presentation, which is compulsory. Failure to deliver a scheduled presentation seminar will result in a fail grade for this project unit.
  • Final Report *: Maximum length of group final report is 50 pages (including tables, figures and references, but not appendices). Students should closely consult the report template and marking sheet for content and formatting requirements. 
  • Mid-Semester/End-Semester Project Status Checking: groups are going to report the project state to clients and seek feedback from clients.

​* indicates an assessment tasks which must be repeated if a student misses it due to special considerations.

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

 

Distinction

75 - 84

 

Credit

65 - 74

 

Pass

50 - 64

 

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

It is a requirement of the School of Computer Science that in order to pass this unit, a student must achieve at least 40% in the written examination. For subjects without a final exam, the 40% minimum requirement applies to the corresponding major assessment component specified by the lecturer. A student must also achieve an overall final mark of 50 or more. Any student not meeting these requirements may be given a maximum final mark of no more than 45 regardless of their average.

There may be statistically defensible moderation when combining the marks from each component to ensure consistency of marking between markers, and alignment of final grades with unit outcomes.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After 10 calendar days late, a mark of 0 will be awarded.

 

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 1. Project allocation; 2. Kick-off lecture Lecture (2 hr) LO2
Week 02 1. Complete project allocation; 2. Independent Project work; 3. Meeting with clients; 4. Attending workshop Project (19 hr) LO2
Week 03 1. Independent Project work; 2. Meeting with clients; 3. Attending workshop Project (19 hr) LO2
Week 04 1. Independent Project work; 2. Meeting with clients; 3. Attending workshop Project (19 hr) LO2 LO4
Week 05 1. Independent Project work; 2. Meeting with clients; 3. Attending workshop Project (19 hr) LO2 LO4
Week 06 1. Independent Project work; 2. Meeting with clients; 3. Attending workshop Project (19 hr) LO1 LO3 LO4 LO6
Week 07 1. Independent Project work; 2. Meeting with clients; 3. Attending workshop Project (19 hr) LO1 LO3 LO4 LO6
Week 08 1. Independent Project work; 2. Meeting with clients; 3. Attending workshop Project (19 hr) LO1 LO3 LO4 LO6
Week 09 1. Independent Project work; 2. Meeting with clients; 3. Attending workshop Project (19 hr) LO1 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 10 1. Independent Project work; 2. Meeting with clients; 3. Attending workshop Project (19 hr) LO1 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 11 1. Independent Project work; 2. Meeting with clients; 3. Attending workshop Project (19 hr) LO1 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 12 1. Independent Project work; 2. Meeting with clients; 3. Attending workshop Project (19 hr) LO1 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 13 Presentation and Reports Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 12 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 240-300 hours of student effort in total.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. utilise prior domain knowledge to define and develop a project relevant to an advanced IT specialist domain (MIT) or the management of IT (MITM) or both technical and IT management domains (MIT/MITM)
  • LO2. initiate, formulate and plan a semester-long IT project, incorporating risk mitigation strategies and following the plan methodically.
  • LO3. analyse and synthesise information, draw appropriate conclusions and present those conclusions in context, with due consideration of methods and assumptions involved
  • LO4. demonstrate knowledge of recent IT literature and possess an ability to apply investigative research to their own project
  • LO5. document, report and present project work undertaken to engage an academic and/or professional audience
  • LO6. develop, substantiate and articulate professional positions on issues relevant to the chosen area of practice, critically reflect on and evaluate the outcomes and process of the project

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

No significant changes have been made since this unit was last offered

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic dishonesty. Similarity of any submitted assessment cannot be higher than 35%.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.