Skip to main content
Unit outline_

DATA5207: Data Analysis in the Social Sciences

Semester 1, 2022 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

Data science is a new, rapidly expanding field. There is an unprecedented demand from technology companies, financial services, government and not-for-profits for graduates who can effectively analyse data. This subject will help students gain a critical understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of quantitative research, and acquire practical skills using different methods and tools to answer relevant social science questions. This subject will offer a nuanced combination of real-world applications to data science methodology, bringing an awareness of how to solve actual social problems to the Master of Data Science. We cover topics including elections, criminology, economics and the media. You will clean, process, model and make meaningful visualisations using data from these fields, and test hypotheses to draw inferences about the social world. Techniques covered range from descriptive statistics and linear and logistic regression, the analysis of data from randomised experiments, model selection for prediction and classification tasks, to the analysis of unstructured text as data, multilevel and geospatial modelling, all using the open source program R. In doing this, not only will we build on the skills you have already mastered through this degree, but explore different ways to use them once you graduate.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Computer Science
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Shaun Ratcliff, shaun.ratcliff@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Shaun Ratcliff, shaun.ratcliff@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment group assignment Group work
Group work. Marked pass/fail.
15% Multiple weeks n/a
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Assignment Research project
Complete major research project.
50% STUVAC 2500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Tutorial quiz Class test 1
Due to COVID-19, this will be take home & open book.
5% Week 05 20 minutes
Outcomes assessed: LO5 LO7 LO6
Assignment Research plan
Develop plan for major research project.
20% Week 07 800 words
Outcomes assessed: LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Tutorial quiz Class test 2
Due to COVID-19, this will be take home and open book.
5% Week 09 20 minutes
Outcomes assessed: LO4 LO7 LO6 LO5
Tutorial quiz Class test 3
Due to COVID-19, this will be take home and open book.
5% Week 13 20 minutes
Outcomes assessed: LO5 LO7 LO6
group assignment = group assignment ?

Assessment summary

  • In-class tests: These are short, 20 minute in-class tests designed to ensure students are progressing as expected. Each test will consist of three questions requiring written answers. Approximately half the material in each will explicitly cover social science applications rather than simply the methods involved, the other half a specifically methods-related question.
    Group work: These will be in-class group projects (of ~5 members), run over multiple weeks, to encourage peer-assisted learning. The group work will generally provide the opportunity to practice and learn the methods covered that week, as well as design the type of research project that comprises the final assessment of the unit. Students will work together to focus on different parts of the project, and quickly analyse data and write up their results. The finished product will be submitted for grading at the end of the seminar.
  • Research plan: Students will choose from four possible questions and several sets of data that will be provided early in the semester. Students will outline their approach to the question, literature that informs it (only five sources are required for the plan), and the methodology that the student intends to use to answer the question. Assessments will need to be completed in R Markdown.
  • Research project: The report will answer the question chosen for the research plan. Grades will be awarded for quality of analysis and presentation, and how well the methods and material covered in this class are used.

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

 

Distinction

75 - 84

 

Credit

65 - 74

 

Pass

50 - 64

 

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Understanding the social world using data science Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 02 Visualising social science data Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO3 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 03 Confounding factors and human behaviour Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO3 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 04 Model building Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO3 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 05 Logistic regression and probability Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO3 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 06 Predicting outcomes in the social world Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 07 Developing a research plan Lecture and tutorial (1 hr) LO2 LO4 LO7
Week 08 Understanding human behaviour through survey design Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO2 LO7
Week 09 Measuring latent variables in the social world Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 10 Using spatial data to understand the world Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO3 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 11 Causality in the social world Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 12 Data journalism Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 13 Conclusion, and developing your research project Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6 LO7

Attendance and class requirements

COVID-19 Announcement:

This unit will be taught as a combined face-to-face and online class.

Lectures will be online, and you will have the option to enrol in either online or in-person labs. Online lectures and labs will all be run live over Zoom.

Recordings will be made available to students and accessibility needs will be considered. 

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

These will be available through the unit Canvas page. 

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. demonstrate familiarity with the various ethical issues and professional standards around the gathering of data
  • LO2. demonstrate proficiency in the delivery of a small-scale project, and the management of the project from initial conception to delivery to evaluation
  • LO3. present data and reports of a high standard
  • LO4. autonomously collect, collate, assess and compare data from multiple sources, such as the Australian Bureau of Statistics and the Australian Data Archive. You will be able to discern the quality of data to a minute level, and be able to draw a broad range of insights from data of various degrees of statistical significance
  • LO5. apply established data analytical methodology in a sophisticated manner and have a medium degree of proficiency in methodological procedures to approach complex problems specifically related to the social sciences
  • LO6. utilise industry-leading concepts and frameworks in your pedagogy and direct formidable amounts of data for protracted, complex insights into areas such as polling data and demography
  • LO7. apply a theoretical understanding of statistical methods to practical problems around data gathering methodology, statistical significance and sample sizing, and autonomously create basic design frameworks for statistical modelling problems.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

This unit has been offered for a number of years and the UoS coordinators have continually worked to improve the quality of teaching materials, learning activities and forms of assessment based on student feedback.

Canvas

Details about weekly topics and assessments will be available on the unit Canvas page.

 

Late submissions

University policies on late submissions apply.

 

Academic Dishonesty and Plagiarism

All written assignments submitted in this unit of study will be submitted to the similarity detecting software program known as Turnitin. Turnitin searches for matches between text in your written assessment task and text sourced from the Internet, published works and assignments that have previously been submitted to Turnitin for analysis.

There will always be some degree of text-matching when using Turnitin. Text-matching may occur in use of direct quotations, technical terms and phrases, or the listing of bibliographic material. This does not mean you will automatically be accused of academic dishonesty or plagiarism, although Turnitin reports may be used as evidence in academic dishonesty and plagiarism decision-making processes.

Computer programming assignments may also be checked by specialist code similarity detection software. The Faculty of Engineering currently uses the MOSS similarity detection engine (see http://theory.stanford.edu/~aiken/moss/) . These programs work in a similar way to TII in that they check for similarity against a database of previously submitted assignments and code available on the internet, but they have added functionality to detect cases of similarity of holistic code structure in cases such as global search and replace of variable names, reordering of lines, changing of comment lines, and the use of white space.

IMPORTANT: School policy relating to Academic Dishonesty and Plagiarism.

In assessing a piece of submitted work, the School of Computer Science may reproduce it entirely, may provide a copy to another member of faculty, and/or to an external plagiarism checking service or in-house computer program and may also maintain a copy of the assignment for future checking purposes and/or allow an external service to do so.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.