Skip to main content
Unit outline_

ECON6024: Private Equity

Semester 1, 2022 [Normal day] - Remote

Private equity (PE) is crucial in developing new business ventures and promoting innovation. This unit investigates how PE firms operate, analysing the key strategic issues they face during the fundraising, investing and exit stages of the PE cycle. Topics covered include: the determinants and types of PE fundraising, the organisational structure of PE firms, the PE firm's investment decision, the PE firm-investee company relationship and the design of exit strategies. The role of PE in the broader economy is also discussed. Finally, we introduce some of the ethical issues PE firms face.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Economics
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
ECON5001 or ECON5040 or ECON5002 or ECON6701 or ECON6702
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Mark Melatos, mark.melatos@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Final exam (Open book) Type C final exam Final exam
Take home exam. Details to be provided on Canvas.
50% Formal exam period 1.5 hours
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9
Assignment Reading assignment
Assignment allocations will be published on Canvas.
25% Multiple weeks 1500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9
Assignment Case study assignment
Assignment allocations will be published on Canvas.
25% Multiple weeks 1500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9
Type C final exam = Type C final exam ?

Assessment summary

Reading & Case Study Assignments
These will be marked on the clarity and throughness of your answers as well as on the extent to which you critically engage with the material in the reading or case study. 

Each student will be assigned a reading and case study by week 2 of the unit.  I will publish the reading and case study allocations on  Canvas.  Please also see Canvas for more details of the questions that must be answered for each assignment.

Assessment criteria

Reading & Case Study Assignments
These will be marked on the clarity and throughness of your answers as well as on the extent to which you critically engage with the material in the reading or case study. 

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a High distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a Distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

 

Distinction

75 - 84

 

Credit

65 - 74

 

Pass

50 - 64

 

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

faculty policy: 5% (of max total marks) per business day.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction, PE structures and compensation Lecture (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9
Week 02 PE investing Lecture (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9
Week 03 PE exit and other issues Lecture (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9
Week 04 PE lifecycles and financing and VC activities and fundraising Seminar (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9
Week 05 PE compensation and PE structures Seminar (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9
Week 06 PE investing Seminar (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9
Week 07 Institutional issues Seminar (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9
Week 08 PE exit Seminar (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9
Week 09 PE and the role of government Seminar (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9
Week 10 Interview cases Seminar (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9
Week 11 Gobi case Seminar (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9
Week 12 Lion case Seminar (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9
Week 13 Yahoo 1 and 2 Seminar (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8 LO9

Attendance and class requirements

  • Attendance: According to Faculty Board Resolutions, students in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences are expected to attend 90% of their classes. If you attend less than 50% of classes, regardless of the reasons, you may be referred to the Examiner’s Board. The Examiner’s Board will decide whether you should pass or fail the unit of study if your attendance falls below this threshold.
  • Lecture recording: Most lectures (in recording-equipped venues) will be recorded and may be made available to students on the LMS. However, you should not rely on lecture recording to substitute your classroom learning experience.  Note that the seminars which make up the majority of the lectures will involve a great deal of classroom and audience interaction.  These interactions may not be captured adequately by the official recording.  So class attendance will be necessary to obtain a complete picture of seminar discussion and material.
  • Preparation: Students should commit to spend approximately three hours’ preparation time (reading, studying, homework, essays, etc.) for every hour of scheduled instruction.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Week 4

  1. “Life cycles of growing organizations: A review with implications for knowledge and learning” Robert Phelps, Richard Adams and John Bessant International Journal of Management Reviews (2007)
  2. “The economics of small business finance: The roles of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle” Allen N. Berger, Gregory F. Udell, Journal of Banking & Finance 22 (1998) pp. 613-673
  3. “Venture capitalist value-added activities, fundraising and drawdowns” Douglas Cumming, Grant Fleming, Jo-Ann Suchard, Journal of Banking & Finance 29 (2005) pp. 295–331
  4. “Entrepreneurs' Access to Private Equity in China: The Role of Social Capital”, Bat Batjargal and Mannie (Manhong) Liu, Organization Science, Vol. 15, No. 2 (Mar. - Apr., 2004), pp. 159-172

Week 5

  1. “An analysis of compensation in the US venture capital partnership” Gompers, P and Lerner, J., Journal of Financial Economics 51 (1999) pp. 3-44
  2. “Venture Capital Limited Partnership Agreements: Understanding Compensation Arrangements”, Kate Litvak, The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 76, No. 1 (Winter, 2009), pp. 161-218
  3. “Do Private Equity Fund Managers Earn Their Fees? Compensation, Ownership, and Cash Flow Performance”, Robinson, David T. Sensoy, Berk A., Review of Financial Studies, 26 (11), pp. 2760-2797
  4. “The Use of Covenants: An Empirical Analysis of Venture Partnership Agreements, Paul Gompers and Josh Lerner, The Journal of Law & Economics, Vol. 39, No. 2 (Oct., 1996), pp. 463-498

Week 6

  1. “Chapter 2: the deal process and preliminary matters”, Geoff Yates and Mike Hichliffe, A Practical Guide to Private Equity Transactions, Cambridge University Press, May 2010.
  2. “Chapter 3: Transaction structures and deal documents”, Geoff Yates and Mike Hichliffe, A Practical Guide to Private Equity Transactions, Cambridge University Press, May 2010.
  3. “Financial Contracting Theory Meets the Real World: An Empirical Analysis of Venture Capital Contracts”, Steven N. Kaplan and Per Strömberg, The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 70, No. 2 (Apr., 2003), pp. 281-315
  4. “Characteristics, Contracts, and Actions: Evidence from Venture Capitalist Analyses”, Steven N. Kaplan and Per Strömberg, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 59, No. 5 (Oct., 2004), pp. 2177-2210

Week 7

  1. “Venture capital and the structure of capital markets: banks versus stock markets”, Bernard S. Black and Ronald J. Gilson, Journal of Financial Economics 47 (1998) 243-277
  2. “An institutional view of China’s venture capital industry: Explaining the differences between China and the West”, Garry D. Bruton and David Ahlstrom, Journal of Business Venturing 18 (2003) 233–259
  3. “Founder-CEO Succession and the Paradox of Entrepreneurial Success”, Noam Wasserman, Organization Science, Vol. 14, No. 2 (Mar. - Apr., 2003), pp. 149-172
  4. “Fund managers under pressure: Rationale and determinants of secondary buyouts”, Sridhar Arcot, Zsuzsanna Fluck, José-Miguel Gaspar, Ulrich Hege, Journal of Financial Economics 115(2015) pp. 102–135

Week 8

  1. “Contracts and Exits in Venture Capital Finance”, Douglas Cumming, The Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 21, No. 5 (Sep., 2008), pp. 1947-1982
  2. “Initial Public Offerings: An Analysis of Theory and Practice”, James Brau and Stanley Fawcett, The Journal of Finance, 61(1), pp. 399-436
  3. “The Post-Issue Operating Performance of IPO Firms”, Bharat Jain and Omesh Kini, The Journal of Finance 49(5), pp. 1699-1726
  4. “Leveraged Buyouts and Private Equity”, Steven N. Kaplan and Per Stromberg, Journal of Economic Perspectives 23(1) pp.121–146

Week 9

  1. “Government policy towards entrepreneurial finance: Innovation investment funds”, Douglas Cumming, Journal of Business Venturing 22 (2007) 193– 235
  2. “The Legislative Road to Silicon Valley”, John Armour and Douglas Cumming, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 58, No. 4 (Oct., 2006), pp. 596-635
  3. “The Returns to Entrepreneurial Investment: A Private Equity Premium Puzzle?”, Tobias Moskowitz and Annette Vissing Jorgensen, The American Economic Review 92(4) pp.745-778
  4. “Regulation of private equity”, Andreas Heed, Journal of Banking Regulation, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 24–47, 2010.

Week 10: Interview Cases

  • The Future of Private Equity: Beyond the Mega Buyout, Mark Bishop, Palgrave MacMillan 2012

Week 11: Gobi Case

Week 12: Lion Case

Week 13: Yahoo! Cases 1 and 2

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. demonstrate skills in oral and written communication
  • LO2. demonstrate skills in problem solving
  • LO3. demonstrate critical thinking
  • LO4. understand the different elements of the PE/VC cycle
  • LO5. understand the nature of the strategic relationship between venture capitalists, entrepreneurs and investors
  • LO6. identify possible private equity investment opportunities and explain how they may be implemented
  • LO7. understand the role of government and regulation in the private equity industry
  • LO8. understand the role of private equity in innovation
  • LO9. feel sufficiently informed to confidently participate in public policy discussions on the impact of the private equity industry.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

No changes have been made since this unit was last offered

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.