Skip to main content
Unit outline_

ENGL3623: The 18th Century: Scandal and Sociability

Semester 1, 2021 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

In eighteenth-century Britain authors were brought into new relation with readers. Commercial publication now central to literary production and dissemination meant texts reached an anonymous and potentially limitless readership. How did awareness of this new public dimension shape literary texts? Students will evaluate the constitutive role of scandal and sociability in the period's most important texts. We will focus on the development of the novel as a sociable form and assess recent theories addressing public engagement in eighteenth-century literature.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
12 credit points at 2000 level in English or 12 credit points at 2000 level in Australian Literature
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
ENGL2659
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Nicola Parsons, nicola.parsons@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Reading Journal
n/a
20% Multiple weeks 750 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Assignment Assignment
n/a
35% Week 06
Due date: 12 Apr 2021 at 23:59
1250 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO4 LO3 LO2
Assignment Research essay
n/a
45% Week 13
Due date: 31 May 2021 at 23:59
2500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO4 LO3 LO2

Assessment summary

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a High distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a Distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

 

Distinction

75 - 84

 

Credit

65 - 74

 

Pass

50 - 64

 

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction Lecture (1 hr)  
The eighteenth-century public sphere Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 02 Periodicals and coffee house cultures Lecture (1 hr)  
Selections from The Tatler and The Spectator Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 03 Eighteenth-century poetry: public or private? Lecture (1 hr)  
Alexander Pope, Epistle to Dr Arbuthnot Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 04 The Adventures of Rivella: Can Gossip be a Political act? Lecture (1 hr)  
Delarivier Manley, The Adventures of Rivella Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 06 The Adventures of Rivella: Scandal and the Law Lecture (1 hr)  
Delarivier Manley, The Adventures of Rivella Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 07 Introducing Moll Flanders Lecture (1 hr)  
Daniel Defoe, Moll Flanders Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 08 A Self out of Scandal: Criminality and Serial Fiction Lecture (1 hr)  
Daniel Defoe, Moll Flanders Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 09 Literary scandal: Samuel Richardson's "new species of writing" Lecture (1 hr)  
Samuel Richardson, Pamela Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 10 Resisting Pamela Lecture (1 hr)  
Samuel Richardson, Pamela Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 11 Public Intimacy: Considering Samuel Johnson Lecture (1 hr)  
Selections from James Boswell's Life of Johnson and Hester Lynch Piozzi's Anecdotes of the Late Doctor Johnson Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 12 Models of Feminine Sociability Lecture (1 hr)  
Sarah Scott, Millenium Hall Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 13 Reflections: Scandal and Sociability Lecture (1 hr)  
Concluding Reflections Seminar (2 hr)  

Attendance and class requirements

  • Attendance: According to Faculty Board Resolutions, students in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences are expected to attend 90% of their classes. If you attend less than 50% of classes, regardless of the reasons, you may be referred to the Examiner’s Board. The Examiner’s Board will decide whether you should pass or fail the unit of study if your attendance falls below this threshold.

  • Preparation: Students should commit to spend approximately three hours’ preparation time (reading, studying, homework, essays, etc.) for every hour of scheduled instruction.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

You are required to obtain four books for this unit. Here are the titles and details of the recommended editions: 

  • *Delarivier Manley, The Adventures of Rivella, edited by Katherine Zelinsky   (Peterborough, ON: Broadview, 1999)
  • Daniel Defoe, Moll Flanders, edited by G. A. Starr and Linda Bree (Oxford: Oxford World’s Classics, 2011)
  • Samuel Richardson, Pamela, edited by Thomas Keymer and Alice Wakely (Oxford: Oxford World’s Classics, 2008)
  • *Sarah Scott, Millenium Hall, edited by Gary Kelly (Peterborough, ON: Broadview, 2001)

*Please note that Broadview also sell electronic editions of these titles, that cost less than the printed versions, directly from their website broadviewpress.com

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. understand the relationship between eighteenth-century literature and forms of social, cultural, and political practice
  • LO2. analyse eighteenth-century literature in a knowledgeable manner
  • LO3. demonstrate skills in research through the competent use of the library and electronic resources particular to the study of eighteenth-century literature
  • LO4. communicate arguments and ideas effectively and articulately both in writing and to others.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

'No changes have been made since this unit was last offered'

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.