ENGP2002: Semester 2, 2024

University home

Library

Current students

Staff intranet

Find an event

Give

Current students

Units ENGP2002 Semester 2 2024 [Professional practice]

Unit outline_

ENGP2002: Professional Engagement Program 2B

Semester 2, 2024 [Professional practice] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

Overview

The BEHonours degree (and all associated combined degrees) requires all students to develop a deep understanding of the professional and social contexts in which their engineering knowledge can be applied, and how this context shapes the application of their knowledge. This involves a strong engagement with the practice of their profession and ensuring that they are responsive to the needs and context of industry and community. This engagement is met through the completion of the PEP - Professional Engagement Program - a degree-long integrated program of professional development activities that involves students in contextualising their learning, progressively taking greater responsibility for their own development, and building the foundations of a strong professional engineering career. This is the second unit of stage 2 of the program. In this unit, students focus on how to articulate their unique value proposition for a potential work experience employer whilst continuing to bridge gaps between employer expectations and their capabilities.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit	Engineering
Credit points	0
Prerequisites ?	ENGP2001
Corequisites ?	None
Prohibitions ?	ENGG4000 or ENGG5217 or ENGP2000
Assumed knowledge ?	None
Available to study abroad and exchange students	No

Teaching staff

Coordinator	Anthony Kadi, anthony.kadi@sydney.edu.au

Assessment

The census date for this unit availability is 2 September 2024

Details
Criteria

Type	Description	Weight	Due	Length
Skills-based evaluation	Professional Engagement Portfolio The portfolio has multiple components described elsewhere in this document	100%	Multiple weeks	semester long
Outcomes assessed:
Skills-based evaluation	Participation in workshop(s) satisfactory participation in collaborative workshop activities	0%	Multiple weeks	2 hours per workshop
Outcomes assessed:
= hurdle task ?

Assessment summary

The professional engagement portfolio consists of the following compulsory components:

online pre-work for your review workshop 2 class (to be completed in canvas PRIOR to attending the class)
satisfactory participation in your review workshop 2 class including completion of classwork in canvas
PEP activity claims and peer reviews in Sonia. Students must achieve a minimum of 140 cumulative approved hours in sonia (of any type) by Friday of week 13.

Assessment criteria

This unit is assessed as pass/fail. If any component of the professional practice portfolio is not completed, a fail grade will be recorded

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Learning support

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Weekly schedule

WK	Topic	Learning activity
Multiple weeks	Complete pre-work for your scheduled review 2 workshop class PRIOR to attending your class	Independent study (2 hr)
	Attend and participate in your scheduled review 2 workshop class and complete class work in canvas during weeks 6-10 as per your allocation in Sydney Timetable	Workshop (2 hr)
	Complete additional professional engagement activities and write claims in sonia for a minimum of 140 approved PEP hours (cumulative from PEP1 + PEP2A + PEP2B) on your sonia dashboard by friday of week 13	Independent study (4 hr)
	WORK EXPERIENCE: If you have completed 96cp of engineering units in Sydney Student, you may apply for approval for your compulsory period of 200 hours of work experience. Obviously you need to find a job first, then lodge an organisation submission form in sonia and also complete the work experience induction module in canvas. Refer to the PEP info site and click on the ENGINEERING WORK button for more information. You must have an approval for work experience to pass PEP2C.	Placement (1 hr)

Attendance and class requirements

Students must satisfactorily participate in the review workshop 2 class and must complete the required pre-work before attending.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester.

Learning outcomes

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

Outcomes
Graduate qualities

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

LO1. Continue to build and refine a personal value proposition for a potential engineering internship employer and articulate this in written and oral forms
LO2. Continue to develop a growing portfolio of professional engagement activities linked to Engineers Australia National Competency standard for Professional Engineers (stage 1), and use this as evidence to support your value proposition. Continue to learn from the peer review of other students' work

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1	Depth of disciplinary expertise Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.
GQ2	Critical thinking and problem solving Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.
GQ3	Oral and written communication Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.
GQ4	Information and digital literacy Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.
GQ5	Inventiveness Generating novel ideas and solutions.
GQ6	Cultural competence Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.
GQ7	Interdisciplinary effectiveness Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.
GQ8	Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.
GQ9	Influence Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes	Graduate qualities
Learning outcomes

Responding to student feedback

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

additional information about interview skills has been added as a result of student feedback

Additional information

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.

Current students

Overview

Overview

Unit details and rules

Teaching staff

Assessment

Assessment

Assessment summary

Assessment criteria

Late submission

Academic integrity

Learning support

Learning support

Simple extensions

Special consideration

Using AI responsibly

Weekly schedule

Weekly schedule

Attendance and class requirements

Study commitment

Learning outcomes

Learning outcomes

Graduate qualities

Outcome map

Responding to student feedback

Responding to student feedback

Additional information

Additional information

Disclaimer

On this page

Useful links

Media

Student links

About us

Connect