Thank you to those students who completed the survey. Overall, the survey scores were completed by 33 students (out of 130; 25%) and on average scores for Q1-6 were down slightly compared to previous years (2019 (3.88) → 2020 3.82). Slight decreases were seen in Q1 (teaching), Q3 (critical thinking), and Q6(helpful feedback); two of these issues are specifically covered below. This is the last year this course will be run in standard mode as it has been discontinued; however, the feedback is useful for other future units of study implemented. Some students enjoyed the assessments and saw the practical relevance of the client test and lectures. Due to COVID-19, I relaxed the criteria for finding volunteers for the practical assignment. It was good to see significantly less student stress around this issue. The positive comments from this year were very similar to previous years. Student’s generally appreciated the content and enjoyed Professor Davis’ teaching and it was good to have him teaching in the course for this year and the previous years. Thank you to those who provided positive comments for Shane Ball; I believe he does an excellent job as a tutor. Improvements: 1. Improvements in the lecture delivery. I will take on board comments. The lecturing team have been given the comments as well and where possible/relevant will try to improve. During the semester, I did enquire about the lectures but the feedback I received was limited. 2. Delayed Slide upload. There were concerns that lecture slides were placed online too late. In future slides will be loaded with more warning. Originally, I started uploading lecture recordings from 2019 because this would give students a lead into the lecture. However, I was told that there were complaints about this placing too much stress on students; I am not sure if this was the majority. This was also designed to allow students to better prepared and be able ask questions during the scheduled lecture about what they did not understand. In future we will try to load lecture slide earlier. 3. Feedback: The feedback on assessment marks was the major point that can be improved. Effort will be made to improve the feedback speed, quality, and depth. Some students felt that the marking criteria were different to what discussed/displayed by the UoS coordinator. In future, more effort will be made to be clearer on the criteria. 4. Organization. Comments around disorganization are somewhat justified. Confounding this may have been the lack of face to face contact due to the lectures being online. Often the information was available on Canvas but the students were not aware. To try and help with this additional weekly Zoom meetings were held to clarify and answer questions, but these were poorly attended. Going forward if we need to do online lectures more effort will be made to improve communication.