Skip to main content
Unit outline_

GOVT3999: Terrorism and Organised Crime

Semester 2, 2024 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

The unit serves as a rigorous investigation of the politics of violent and criminal non-state actors. It will start with a conceptual discussion of such groups, focusing on analysis of their structure and behaviour and the roles that globalisation and technology play in non-state threats, before moving on to specific types of dark networks. The dark networks that may be covered include terrorist organisations, non-state nuclear proliferation networks, and various forms of organised crime, including maritime piracy, drug trafficking, mafias, mundane smuggling, and money laundering.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Government and International Relations
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
12 credit points at 2000 level in Politics or 12 credit points at 2000 level in International Relations or 12 senior credit points from Government and International Relations
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Justin Hastings, justin.hastings@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Sulagna Basu, sulagna.basu@sydney.edu.au
Tutor(s) Farah Naz, farah.naz@sydney.edu.au
The census date for this unit availability is 2 September 2024
Type Description Weight Due Length
Participation Tutorial participation
n/a
10% Ongoing Whole semester.
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO4 LO3 LO2
Small test Mid-semester in-class test
Midterm in-class test
25% Week 06
Due date: 03 Sep 2024 at 11:00
1 hr
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO4 LO3 LO2
Assignment Briefing paper
Briefing paper about active terrorist group or organised crime group
40% Week 10
Due date: 08 Oct 2024 at 23:59
2500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Small test Final in-class test
Final in-class test
25% Week 13
Due date: 29 Oct 2024 at 11:00
1 hr
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO4 LO3 LO2

Assessment summary

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a High distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a Distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

 

Distinction

75 - 84

 

Credit

65 - 74

 

Pass

50 - 64

 

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see sydney.edu.au/students/guide-to-grades

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Support for students

The Support for Students Policy 2023 reflects the University’s commitment to supporting students in their academic journey and making the University safe for students. It is important that you read and understand this policy so that you are familiar with the range of support services available to you and understand how to engage with them.

The University uses email as its primary source of communication with students who need support under the Support for Students Policy 2023. Make sure you check your University email regularly and respond to any communications received from the University.

Learning resources and detailed information about weekly assessment and learning activities can be accessed via Canvas. It is essential that you visit your unit of study Canvas site to ensure you are up to date with all of your tasks.

If you are having difficulties completing your studies, or are feeling unsure about your progress, we are here to help. You can access the support services offered by the University at any time:

Support and Services (including health and wellbeing services, financial support and learning support)
Course planning and administration
Meet with an Academic Adviser

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 What is terrorism? Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 02 Why do people become terrorists? Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 03 Network Analysis and Dark Networks Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 04 Dark Networks, Society, and the State Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 05 Power, Race and Gender – Intersectional Lenses on Terror Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 06 Radicalisation and ‘Lone Actors’ Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 07 Geographies of Terrorism Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 08 Trafficking and Modern Slavery Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 09 Maritime Piracy Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 10 Illicit Financing Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 11 Drug Trafficking Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 12 Mafias Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 13 Sport, Terrorism and Organised Crime Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4

Attendance and class requirements

  • Attendance: According to Faculty Board Resolutions, students in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences are expected to attend 90% of their classes. If you attend less than 50% of classes, regardless of the reasons, you may be referred to the Examiner’s Board. The Examiner’s Board will decide whether you should pass or fail the unit of study if your attendance falls below this threshold.
  • Lecture recording: Most lectures (in recording-equipped venues) will be recorded and may be made available to students on the LMS. However, you should not rely on lecture recording to substitute your classroom learning experience.
  • Preparation: Students should commit to spend approximately three hours’ preparation time (reading, studying, homework, essays, etc.) for every hour of scheduled instruction.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

GOVT3999 Reading List Semester 2 2024

 

Week 1: What is Terrorism?

 

Richards, A. (2014). Conceptualizing Terrorism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 37(3), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2014.872023

 

Ramsay, G. (2015). Why terrorism can, but should not be defined. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 8(2), 211-228.

 

Gentry, C., & Sjoberg, L. (2022). Terrorism and political violence. In Gender matters in global politics (pp. 370-384). Routledge.

 

Recommended Reading:

 

Khan, R. M. (2024). A case for the abolition of “terrorism” and its industry. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 1-24.

 

Lee Jarvis (23 May 2024): Three waves of critical terrorism studies: agenda-setting, elaboration, problematisation, Critical Studies on Terrorism, DOI: 10.1080/17539153.2024.2356918

 

Ortbals, C. D., & Poloni-Staudinger, L. (2014). Women defining terrorism: ethnonationalist, state, and machista terrorism. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 7(3), 336–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2014.956014

 

Week 2: Why do people become terrorists?

 

Newman, E. (2006). Exploring the “Root Causes” of Terrorism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 29(8), 749–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/10576100600704069

 

Wilhelmsen, J. (2020). Exclusion and Inclusion: The Core of Chechen Mobilization to Jihad. Perspectives on Terrorism, 14(2), 27–41. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26910405

 

Bhattacharya, S. (2019). Gender, insurgency, and terrorism: introduction to the special issue. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 30(6–7), 1077–1088. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2019.1649833

 

Recommended Reading:

 

Ortbals, C. D., & Poloni-Staudinger, L. (2014). Women defining terrorism: ethnonationalist, state, and machista terrorism. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 7(3), 336–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2014.956014

 

Kruglova, A. (2022). Terrorist recruitment, propaganda and branding: selling terror online. Routledge. (Chapter 1: Introduction)

 

Week 3: Network Analysis and Dark Networks

 

Calvert Jones and Mette Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, ‘Assessing the Dangers of Illicit Networks: Why al-Qaida May Be Less Dangerous Than Many Think’, International Security, 33, no. 2 (2008), pp. 7 – 44

 

Koch, A. (2022). The ONA Network and the Transnationalization of Neo-Nazi-Satanism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2021.2024944

 

Mac Ginty, R. (2010). Social network analysis and counterinsurgency: a counterproductive strategy? Critical Studies on Terrorism, 3(2), 209-226.

 

Recommended Readings:

 

David Bright, Chad Whelan & Shandon Harris-Hogan (2020) On the Durability of Terrorist Networks: Revealing the Hidden Connections between Jihadist Cells, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 43:7, 638-656, DOI:10.1080/1057610X.2018.1494411

 

Lee, C. S., Choi, K. S., Shandler, R., & Kayser, C. (2021). Mapping global cyberterror networks: an empirical study of al-Qaeda and ISIS cyberterrorism events. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 37(3), 333-355.

 

Spencer, A. N. (2016). The hidden face of terrorism: An analysis of the women in Islamic State. Journal of Strategic Security, 9(3), 74-98.

 

 

Week 4: Dark Networks, Society, and the State

 

Omelicheva, M. Y., & Markowitz, L. P. (2021). Rethinking intersections of crime and terrorism: Insights from political economies of violence. International Studies Review, 23(4), 1541-1565.

 

Bakker, R. M., Raab, J., & Milward, H. B. (2012). A preliminary theory of dark network resilience. Journal of policy analysis and management, 31(1), 33-62.

Giroux, H. A. (2007). Beyond the spectacle of terrorism: rethinking politics in the society of the image. Situations: Project of the radical imagination, 2(1).

 

Recommended:

 

Godefroidt, A. (2023). How terrorism does (and does not) affect citizens’ political attitudes: a meta‐analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 67(1), 22-38.

 

Naaman, D. (2007). Brides of Palestine/angels of death: Media, gender, and performance in the case of the Palestinian female suicide bombers. Signs, 32(4), 933–955. https://doi.org/10.1086/512624

 

Jarvis, L., & Whiting, A. (2023). (En) Gendering the Dead Terrorist:(De) Constructing Masculinity in Terrorist Media Obituaries. International Studies Quarterly, 67(4)

 

 

Week 5: Power, Race and Gender – Intersectional Lenses on Terror

 

Anna M. Agathangelou & L.H.M. Ling (2004). ‘Power, borders, security wealth: lessons of violence and desire from September 11.’ International Studies Quarterly 48(3): 517-538.

 

Sjoberg, L., & Gentry, C. E. (Eds.). (2011). Women, gender, and terrorism. University of Georgia Press. (Chapter 1: introduction)

 

Morton, S. (2007). Terrorism, Orientalism and Imperialism. Wasafiri, 22(2), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/02690050701336774

 

Recommended Reading:

 

Zine, J. (2016). Between orientalism and fundamentalism: Muslim women and feminist engagement. In (En) Gendering the War on Terror (pp. 27-49). Routledge.

 

Abu-Bakare, A. Counterterrorism and race. Int Polit Rev 8, 79–99 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41312-020-00074-x

 

Búzás, Z. I., & Meier, A. A. (2023). Racism by Designation: Making Sense of Western States’ Nondesignation of White Supremacists as Terrorists. Security Studies, 32(4–5), 680–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2023.2230882

 

 

Week 6: Radicalisation and ‘Lone Actors’

 

Schuurman, B., Lindekilde, L., Malthaner, S., O’Connor, F., Gill, P., & Bouhana, N. (2018). End of the Lone Wolf: The Typology that Should Not Have Been. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 42(8), 771–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2017.1419554

 

O'Connor, F., Lindekilde, L., & Malthaner, S. (2023). Radicalisation of ‘lone actors’. In The Routledge Handbook on Radicalisation and Countering Radicalisation (pp. 213-230). Routledge.

 

McCulloch, J., Walklate, S., Maher, J. et al. (2019). Lone Wolf Terrorism Through a Gendered Lens: Men Turning Violent or Violent Men Behaving Violently?. Critical Crimonology 27, 437–450 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-019-09457-5

 

Recommended Reading:

 

Gardell, M. (2018). Urban terror: The case of lone wolf Peter Mangs. Terrorism and Political Violence, 30(5), 793-811.

 

Kaplan, J. (2022). No Longer Alone: Lone Wolves, Wolf Packs, and Made for Web TV Specials. In Right-Wing Extremism in Canada and the United States (pp. 279-298). Cham: Springer International Publishing

 

Breen-Smyth, M. (2020). The lone (white) wolf, ‘terrorism’ and the suspect community. In Encountering extremism (pp. 74-97). Manchester University Press.

 

Week 7: Geographies of Terrorism

 

Pain, R. (2014). Everyday terrorism: Connecting domestic violence and global terrorism. Progress in Human Geography, 38(4), 531-550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513512231

 

Hoffman, B., Ware, J., & Shapiro, E. (2020). Assessing the Threat of Incel Violence. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 43(7), 565–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2020.1751459

 

Mustafa, D. (2005), The Terrible Geographicalness of Terrorism: Reflections of a Hazards Geographer. Antipode, 37: 72-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00474.x

 

Recommended Reading:

 

Castan Pinos, J., & M. Radil, S. (2018). The Territorial Contours of Terrorism: A Conceptual Model of Territory for Non-state Violence. Terrorism and Political Violence, 32(5), 1027–1046. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2018.1442328

 

Bahgat, K., & Medina, R. M. (2013). An overview of geographical perspectives and approaches in terrorism research. Perspectives on Terrorism, 7(1), 38-72.

 

Week 8: Trafficking and Modern Slavery

 

Mende, J. (2019). The concept of modern slavery: definition, critique, and the human rights frame. Human Rights Review, 20(2), 229-248.

 

S Milivojevic, H Moore, and M Segrave, ‘Freeing the Modern  Slaves,  One  Click  at  a  Time:  Theorising  human  trafficking,  modern  slavery, and technology’, Anti-Trafficking Review, Issue 14, 2020, pp. 16-32, https://doi.org/10.14197/atr.201220142

 

Lee Koch, I. (2024). From Criminals to Slaves: “Modern Slavery,” Drug Trafficking, and the Cultural Politics of Victimhood in Postcolonial Britain. Current Anthropology, 65(2), 267-291

 

Recommended Reading:

 

Justine Nolan & Gregory Bott (2018) Global supply chains and human rights: spotlight on forced labour and modern slavery practices, Australian Journal of Human Rights, 24:1, 44-69

 

Yusriza, B. (2020). The political economy of unfree labor and the state: An Indonesian case study. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 29(1), 55-78.

 

Week 9: Maritime Piracy

 

Hastings, J. V., & Phillips, S. G. (2015). Maritime piracy business networks and institutions in Africa. African Affairs, 114(457), 555-576.

 

Gilmer, B. (2019). Invisible Pirates: Women and the Gendered Roles of Somali Piracy. Feminist Criminology, 14(3), 371-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085117741361

 

Young, A. (2005). 1. Roots of Contemporary Maritime Piracy in Southeast Asia. In D. Johnson & M. Valencia (Ed.), Piracy in Southeast Asia: Status, Issues, and Responses (pp. 1-33). Singapore: ISEAS Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789812305893-003

 

Recommended Reading:

 

Fredrick, S. (2023). Piracy as Resistance in the Caribbean and the Pacific. Routledge.

 

Chapsos, I., & Norman, E. A. (2023). Is maritime security gender-blind?. Marine Policy, 147, 105399.

 

Week 10: Illicit Financing

 

Susan Rose-Ackerman and Bonnie J. Palifka (2018), ‘Corruption, Organised Crime and Money Laundering’, in Kaushik Basu and Tito Cordella, eds., Institutions, Governance and the Control of Corruption (Cham: Springer International Publishing), Chapter 4, pp. 75 – 111;

 

Kethineni, S., & Cao, Y. (2020). The rise in popularity of cryptocurrency and associated criminal activity. International Criminal Justice Review, 30(3), 325-344.

 

Goldbarsht, D. (2018). Shedding Light on Shadow Banking: The Money or Value Transfer Service Regime in Australia and Its Origins. The Journal of Criminal Law, 82(3), 264-276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022018318773206

 

Recommended reading:

 

Teichmann, F. M. J. (2017). Twelve methods of money laundering. Journal of money laundering control, 20:2, pp. 130-137.

 

Templon, J., et. al. (2020) ‘How To Find A Company That Barely Even Exists’, Buzzfeed News, https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/johntemplon/singapore-shell-company-funneled-millions-banks

 

Leopold, J., et. al. (2020), ‘The FinCEN Files’, Buzzfeed News, https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/jasonleopold/fincen-files-financial-scandal-criminal-networks

 

Week 11: Drug Trafficking

 

Kenney, M. (2007). The architecture of drug trafficking: network forms of organisation in the Colombian cocaine trade. Global crime, 8(3), 233-259.

 

Van Uhm, D. P., & Grigore, A. G. (2021). Indigenous people, organized crime and natural resources: Borders, incentives and relations. Critical Criminology, 29(3), 487-503.

 

Fleetwood, J., & Leban, L. (2022). Women’s Involvement in the Drug Trade: Revisiting the Emancipation Thesis in Global Perspective. Deviant Behavior, 44(2), 238–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2022.2033607

 

Recommended Reading:

 

Bichler, G., Malm, A., & Cooper, T. (2017). Drug supply networks: a systematic review of the organizational structure of illicit drug trade. Crime Science, 6(1), 2

 

Goodhand, J. (2021). Beyond the narco frontier; rethinking an imaginary of the margins. International Journal of Drug Policy, 89, 103045.

 

Daniels, C., Aluso, A., Burke-Shyne, N., Koram, K., Rajagopalan, S., Robinson, I., ... & Tandon, T. (2021). Decolonizing drug policy. Harm Reduction Journal, 18(1), 120.

 

Week 12: Mafias

 

Collins, R. (2011). Patrimonial alliances and failures of state penetration: A historical dynamic of crime, corruption, gangs, and mafias. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 636(1), 16-31.

 

Simoni, Serena (2018) Queens of narco-trafficking: breaking gender hierarchy in Colombia, International Affairs, Volume 94, Issue 6, 1257–1267, https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiy198

 

Recommended Reading:

 

Reuter, P., & Paoli, L. (2020). How similar are modern criminal syndicates to traditional mafias?. Crime and Justice, 49(1), 223-287.

 

Camacho, A. (2024). The moral panic of the mafioso: The rise of the prison industrial complex and the attack on Brown communities. Latino Studies, 1-25.

 

Week 13: Sport, Terrorism and Organised Crime

 

Costa, J. (2018). The globalised network of a dirty game: match-fixing, illegal betting and transnational organised crime in Italian football. Global Crime, 19(2), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2018.1460952

 

Giulianotti, R., & Klauser, F. (2012). Sport mega-events and ‘terrorism’: A critical analysis. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 47(3), 307-323.

 

Recommended Reading:

 

Mitchell, G. (2016). Evangelical ecstasy meets feminist fury: Sex trafficking, moral panics, and homonationalism during global sporting events. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 22(3), 325-357.

 

Millward, P., Ludvigsen, J. A. L., & Sly, J. (2022). Sport and crime: towards a critical criminology of sport. Routledge. (Chapter 3)

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. demonstrate a clear understanding of the theoretical and analytical approaches used in the study of violent and criminal non-state actors
  • LO2. delineate between the different problems associated with dark networks from an applied analysis of general trends of globalisation and technology
  • LO3. assess cogently and concisely the structure, behaviour, and threats posed by dark networks.
  • LO4. understand how academic concepts can provide insight into pressing global issues

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Readings and topics covered have been updated to reflect current issues in terrorism and organised crime.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.