Skip to main content
Unit outline_

GOVT6301: Public Sector Ethics and Corruption

Semester 2, 2024 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

Much recent attention has focused on preventing corruption and improving ethics in public sector organisations around the world. This unit equips students to identify and analyse different forms of corruption and ethical failure, and to reflect critically on the best ways of combatting corruption and enhancing ethics in the public sector. The unit takes a comparative approach to these issues.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Government and International Relations
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Rodney Smith, rodney.smith@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Rodney Smith, rodney.smith@sydney.edu.au
Tutor(s) Rodney Smith, rodney.smith@sydney.edu.au
The census date for this unit availability is 2 September 2024
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Short paper
Essay analysing a short set text (see GOVT6301 Canvas site for details).
15% Week 03
Due date: 16 Aug 2024 at 23:59
900 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO5
Assignment Essay
Essay comparing two countries (see GOVT6301 Canvas site for details).
60% Week 11
Due date: 18 Oct 2024 at 23:59
3600 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5
Assignment Reflective journal
Short entry reflective journal (see GOVT6301 Canvas site for details).
25% Week 13
Due date: 30 Oct 2024 at 23:59
1500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO4 LO1 LO2 LO5

Assessment summary

Detailed information about each assessment task can be found on the GOVT6301 Canvas site.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a High distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a Distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

 

Distinction

75 - 84

 

Credit

65 - 74

 

Pass

50 - 64

 

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

As per Faculty policies.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Support for students

The Support for Students Policy 2023 reflects the University’s commitment to supporting students in their academic journey and making the University safe for students. It is important that you read and understand this policy so that you are familiar with the range of support services available to you and understand how to engage with them.

The University uses email as its primary source of communication with students who need support under the Support for Students Policy 2023. Make sure you check your University email regularly and respond to any communications received from the University.

Learning resources and detailed information about weekly assessment and learning activities can be accessed via Canvas. It is essential that you visit your unit of study Canvas site to ensure you are up to date with all of your tasks.

If you are having difficulties completing your studies, or are feeling unsure about your progress, we are here to help. You can access the support services offered by the University at any time:

Support and Services (including health and wellbeing services, financial support and learning support)
Course planning and administration
Meet with an Academic Adviser

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction to Public Sector Ethics. Lecture and tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5
Week 02 Approaches to Defining Corruption Lecture and tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5
Week 03 Researching and Comparing Corruption: Quantitative Approaches Lecture and tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 04 Grand and Petty Corruption: Qualitative Approaches to Understanding the Causes and Mechanisms of Corruption. Lecture and tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 05 How Different Are Public Sector and Private Sector Ethics? Lecture and tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 06 Thin Blue Lines: Do Some Public Sector Activities Require Special Ethical Attention? Lecture and tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 07 What Use are Codes of Ethics and Codes of Conduct? Lecture and tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 08 Do Specialist Anti-Corruption Agencies (ICACs etc) Help Prevent Corruption and Promote Integrity? Lecture and tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 09 Protecting Whistleblowers and Handling Whistleblower Reports. Lecture and tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 10 What Role can Civil Society (the Media, NGOs, Citizen Action) Play in Promoting Ethics and Curbing Corruption? Lecture and tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 11 What Are 'Integrity Systems'? Do We Need Them to Thwart Corruption and Promote Ethics in the Public Sector? Lecture and tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 12 International Anti-Corruption Treaties and Other International Measures. Lecture and tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 13 Conclusions: Where to Start to Improve Public Sector Ethics and Resist Public Sector Corruption? Lecture and tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5

Attendance and class requirements

  • Attendance: According to Faculty Board Resolutions, students in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences are expected to attend 90% of their classes. If you attend less than 50% of classes, regardless of the reasons, you may be referred to the Examiner’s Board. The Examiner’s Board will decide whether you should pass or fail the unit of study if your attendance falls below this threshold.
  • Lecture recording: Lectures will be recorded and made available to students on the LMS (Canvas).
  • Preparation: Students should commit to spend approximately three hours’ preparation time (reading, studying, homework, essays, etc.) for every hour of scheduled instruction.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

GOVT6301 CLASS READINGS FOR SEMESTER 2 2024

NB: All the required readings can be accessed online via the Library.

Week

Reading

 

 

1

 

 

  • Long Ling, 'Diary', London Review of Books 27 June 2017
  • Alan Lawton, Julie Rayner, and Karin Lasthuizen. Ethics and Management in the Public Sector. Oxford: Routledge, 2013, Chapter 2.

2

 

 

  • Carl J. Friedrich, The Pathology of Politics, New York, Harper and Row, 1972, pp. 127-141.
  • Michael Jackson and Rodney Smith, ‘Inside Moves and Outside Views: An Australian Case Study of Elite and Public Perceptions of Political Corruption’, Governance 9(1) 1996, pp. 23-42.
  • Giorgio Blundo and Jean-Pierre Olivier de Sardan, with N. Bako Arifari and M. Tidjani Alou (translated by Susan Cox), Everyday Corruption and the State. London: Zed Books, 2006: 110-134.

3

 

  • Daniel Treisman, ‘What Have We Learnt about the Causes of Corruption from Ten Years of Empirical Research?’, Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 2007, pp. 211-244.
  • Alina Mungiu-Pippidi and Mihály Fazekas, ‘How to Define and Measure Corruption’, in Alina Mungiu-Pippidi and Paul M. Heywood (eds.), A Research Agenda for Studies of Corruption, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2020, pp. 7-26.

4

 

  • Michael Johnston, Syndromes of Corruption, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005, Chapter 3.
  • Robert Klitgaard, Controling Corruption. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988: 69-75.
  • Donnatella della Porta and Alberto Vannucci, The Hidden Order of Corruption, Farnham, Ashgate, 2012, Chapter 2.

5

  • Hal G. Rainey and Young Han Chun, ‘Public and Private Management Compared’, in E. Ferlie, L. Lynn Jr and C. Pollitt (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005.
  • Zeger van der Wal, ‘The Content and Context of Organizational Ethics’, Public Administration, 89:2, 2011, pp. 644-660.

 

6

 

  • Tim Prenzler, Police Corruption: Preventing Misconduct and Maintaining Integrity. London, CRC Press, 2009, Chapter 2, pp. 15-26.
  • Louise Westmarland, ‘Police ethics and integrity: Breaking the blue code of silence.’ Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy, 15(2), 2006, pp. 145–165.
  • M. Alain and M. Grégoire, ‘Can ethics survive the shock of the job? Quebec’s police recruits confront reality.’ Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy, 18(2), 2008, pp. 169–189.

7

 

 

  • Niamh Kinchin. “Professional Perspectives: More than Writing on a Wall: Evaluating the Role That Codes of Ethics Play in Securing Accountability of Public Sector Decision-Makers.” Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(1), 2007, pp. 112-120.
  • Manfred F. Meine and Thomas P. Dunn, ‘The Search for Ethical Competency. Do Ethics Codes Matter?’, Public Integrity 15(2) 2013: 149-166.

8

 

 

  • Bertrand de Speville, ‘Anticorruption Commissions: The “Hong Kong Model” Revisited’, Asia-Pacific Review, 17:1, 2010, pp. 47-71.
  • Martin Painter, ‘Myths of Political Independence, Or How Not to Solve the Corruption Problem: Lessons for Vietnam’, Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, 1(2) 2014, 273-286.
  • Sergio Marco Gemperle, ‘Comparing Anti-Corruption Agencies: A New Crossnational Index’, International Review of Public Administration 22(3) 2018, 156-175.

9

 

 

  • Rodney Smith, ‘The Role of Whistle-Blowing in Governing Well: Evidence from the Australian Public Sector’, American Review of Public Administration, 40:6, 2010, pp. 704-721.
  • Kenny, Kate, Marianna Fotaki, and Wim Vandekerckhove. ‘Whistleblower Subjectivities: Organization and Passionate Attachment.’. Organization Studies 41:3, 2020, 323–43.

10

 

  • Rochman Achwan and Meuhia Ganie-Rochman, ‘Civic Organisations and Governance Reform in Indonesian Cities’, Asian Journal of Political Science, 37, 2009, pp. 799-820.
  • Martin Webb, ‘Activating Citizens, Remaking Brokerage: Transparency Activism, Ethical Scenes and the Urban Poor in Delhi’, Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 35:2, 2012, pp. 206-222.
  • Nurul Huda Sakib, ‘Community Organizing in Anti-Corruption Initiatives through Spontaneous Participation: Bangladesh Perspective’, Community Development Journal, 57(2) 2022, pp. 360–79.

11

 

  • Jeremy Pope, ‘National Integrity Systems: The Key to Building Sustainable, Just and Honest Government’, in B. Head, AJ Brown and C. Connors (eds), Promoting Integrity, Farnham, Ashgate, 2008.
  • Charles Sampford, Rodney Smith and AJ Brown, ‘From Greek Temple to Bird’s Nest: Towards a Theory of Coherence and Mutual Accountability for National Integrity Systems’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 64:2, 2005, pp. 96-108.
  • Paul M. Heywood and Elizabeth Johnson, ‘Cultural specificity versus institutional universalism: a critique of the National Integrity System (NIS) methodology’, Crime, Law and Social Change. 2017, pp. 1-16.

12

 

  • Stuart S. Yeh, ‘Ending Corruption in Africa through United Nations Inspections’, International Affairs, 87:3, 2011, pp. 629-650.
  • Mathis Lohaus, Towards a Global Consensus Against Corruption, London, Routledge, 2019, Chapter 5, pp. 153-169.

13

 

 

  • No readings required.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. create new knowledge and understanding through the process of research and inquiry
  • LO2. recognise the impact of cultural contexts on public sector ethics and corruption.
  • LO3. conduct comparative research into public sector ethics and corruption using a range of sources.
  • LO4. take part in informed discussions about public sector ethics and corruption using appropriate language and critical listening.
  • LO5. reflect more critically on the ethical issues involved in public sector activities at local, national and international levels.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Changes to the structure of the GOVT6301 curriculum and to some readings have been made since the unit of study was last offered in 2020. The most important changes have to do with the fact that GOVT6301 was last taught online over 12 weeks as a result of Covid-19 restrictions. This will be the first time GOVT6301 has been taught face to face over 13 weeks since 2019.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.