Outline

Overview

Science has given us nearly infinite possibilities for controlling life. Scientists probe the origins of life through research with stem cells and embryos. To unlock the secrets of disease, biomedicine conducts cruel experiments on animals. GM crops are presented as the answer to hunger. Organ transplantation is almost routine. The international traffic in human body parts and tissues is thriving. The concept of brain death makes harvesting organs ethically more acceptable. It may also result in fundamental changes in our ideas about life. Science has provided new ways of controlling and manipulating life and death. As a consequence, difficult ethical questions are raised in increasingly complex cultural and social environments. This course will discuss major issues in the ethics of biology and medicine, from gene modification to Dolly the sheep. This unit will be introductory, but a small number of topical issues will be studied in depth. No scientific background beyond Year 10 level will be assumed.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit	History and Philosophy of Science Academic Operations
Credit points	6
Prerequisites ?	None
Corequisites ?	None
Prohibitions ?	HPSC1900
Assumed knowledge ?	None
Available to study abroad and exchange students	Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator	Anson Fehross, anson.fehross@sydney.edu.au
Tutor(s)	Laura Sumrall, laura.sumrall@sydney.edu.au

Type	Description	Weight	Due	Length
Participation	Participation Individual contributions to class/online discussions and activities	10%	Ongoing	Weekly
Outcomes assessed:
Assignment	Short paper Short paper (critical exegesis) submitted via Turnitin	20%	Week 02	750 words
Outcomes assessed:
Assignment	Essay 1 Research Essay submitted via Turnitin	35%	Week 04	1500 words
Outcomes assessed:
Assignment	Essay 2 Research Essay submitted via Turnitin	35%	Week 06	1500 words
Outcomes assessed:

Assessment summary

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Written assessment grading criteria:

Result name	Mark range	Description
High distinction	85 - 100	For a High Distinction (85+), you must do everything required for a distinction, plus submit work that is consistently of an exceptional standard; exhibit considerable initiative and ingenuity in research and reading; provide innovative interpretations and arguments including insightful 31 contributions to theoretical debates; and develop abstract or theoretical arguments based on detailed research and original interpretation. Your written work must be characterised by a high degree of creativity, scholarly style, and precision.
Distinction	75 - 84	For a Distinction (75-84), you must do everything required for a credit, plus demonstrate initiative in research and reading; show a complex understanding and original, creative analysis of the subject matter and its context; and take a critical stance in relation to the underlying assumptions in the field as well as the theoretical arguments and their interpretations associated with the course topics. Your written work and presentations must be properly documented, and writing is characterised by scholarly style, clarity, and some creativity.
Credit	65 - 74	For a Credit (65-74), you must do everything required for a high pass, plus go beyond mere identification of the relevant issues, to criticise particular positions; exhibit comprehensive reading and critical evaluation of the course materials including their broader theoretical significance; and provide well-defended, coherent arguments based on solid scholarly research as well as some evidence of independent thought and initiative. A low (65-69) credit indicates competent work, demonstrating the potential to pursue honours work, though further development would be needed to do so successfully; a high (70-74) credit demonstrates a clear capacity to pursue honours.
Pass	50 - 64	For a (Low) Pass (50-57), you must complete all of the assignments and exams of the Unit of Study, as outlined in the section on assessment of the course syllabus. In addition, in a particular assessment, you should have been able to identify and describe the principal issues related to the assessment; and present organised, comprehensible oral and written arguments for particular positions supported by appropriate scholarly documentation. However, written work typically includes evidence of very minimal reading and limited understanding of the set readings and subject matter, and may have a tendency to rely on paraphrasing. For a (High) Pass (58-64), you must do everything required for a low pass, plus provide synthesis and some evaluation of relevant material and arguments with a logical and comprehensible structure; evidence a broad and fairly accurate command of the set readings and subject matter; and exhibit efforts to go beyond the basic lecture material particularly to explore diverse interpretations of the subject matter. However, written work or presentations typically have weaknesses in clarity or structure, and show a somewhat limited command of the subject matter or its broader significance.
Fail	0 - 49	Mark of a Fail (below 50) indicates that your work is not of acceptable standard overall, and/or you have failed to achieve a 50% in some component of the UoS. You may receive a fail for a particular assessment for any or all of the following reasons: unacceptable levels of paraphrasing or lack of citation (see also the policy on Academic Honesty); irrelevance of content; careless or sloppy presentation, grammar, or argument structure such that it is difficult to understand the claims being made; evidence of inadequate knowledge or understanding of readings or lectures; or late submission without extension via the Faculty special considerations procedure.

Tutorial participation grading criteria:

Result name	Mark range	Description
High distinction	85 - 100	For a High Distinction (85+), you must be an outstanding contributor: Contributions in class reflect extensive preparation. Ideas offered are usually substantive; provide major insights and direction for class discussion. Challenges are substantiated and persuasive. Makes an important contribution to class discussion overall.
Distinction	75 - 84	For a Distinction (75-84), your contributions in class reflect thorough preparation. Ideas offered are often substantive; provide useful insights and some direction for class discussion. Challenges are substantiated and often persuasive. Makes a significant contribution to class discussion overall.
Credit	65 - 74	For a Credit (65-74), your contributions in class reflect adequate preparation. Ideas offered are sometimes substantive; provide some insight but rarely offer direction for class discussion. Challenges are sometimes presented, substantiated and persuasive. Makes a contribution to class discussion overall.
Pass	50 - 64	For a pass (50-64), your contributions in class reflect inadequate preparation. Ideas offered are rarely substantive; rarely provide insight but do not offer useful direction for class discussion. Contributions may be distractions rather than constructive. Does not make a positive contribution to class discussion overall.
Fail	0 - 49	Mark of a Fail (below 50) indicates that your contributions add little or nothing in class. There is not an adequate basis for evaluation. Makes no contribution to discussion.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Learning support

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Weekly schedule

WK	Topic	Learning activity
Week 01	1.1: Introduction and Administration	Lecture (1 hr)
	1.2: What Ethics Is/Is Not	Lecture (1 hr)
	1.3 & 1.4: Kantianism	Lecture (2 hr)
	1.5 & 1.6: Consequentialism and its Problems	Lecture (2 hr)
	Tutorials 1 & 2: Course Overview and Ethical Theory	Tutorial (2 hr)
Week 02	2.1 & 2.2: Paternalism and the Rise of Autonomy	Lecture (2 hr)
	2.3: How to Write a Bioethics Paper	Lecture (1 hr)
	2.4 & 2.5: Informed Consent and its Challenges	Lecture (2 hr)
	2.6.: Advance Directives and their Challenges 1	Lecture (1 hr)
	Tutorials 3 & 4: Autonomy, Paternalism and Informed Consent	Tutorial (2 hr)
Week 03	3.1: Advance Directives and their Challenges 2	Lecture (1 hr)
	3.2 & 3.3: Conscientious Objection and Role Responsibility	Lecture (2 hr)
	3.4 & 3.5: Active and Passive Euthanasia	Lecture (2 hr)
	3.6: The Duty to Die	Lecture (1 hr)
	Tutorials 5 & 6: Conscientious Objection, Euthanasia and the Duty to Die	Tutorial (2 hr)
Week 04	4.1: Personhood and Killing	Lecture (1 hr)
	4.2 & 4.3: Personhood, Rights and Abortion	Lecture (2 hr)
	4.4, 4.5 & 4.6: Choosing Children: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Disability	Lecture (3 hr)
Week 05	Tutorials 7 and 8: Personhood, Abortion, and Disability	Tutorial (2 hr)
	5.1, 5.2 & 5.3: Genetic Modification and Future Children	Lecture (3 hr)
	5.4 & 5.5: Cloning	Lecture (2 hr)
	5.6: Stem Cells	Lecture (1 hr)
	Tutorials 9 and 10: Genetic Modification, Cloning and Stem Cells	Tutorial (2 hr)
Week 06	6.1., 6.2 & 6.3: Organ Markets, Rights and Wrongs	Lecture (3 hr)
	6.4 & 6.5: Justice in (Global) Medicine	Lecture (2 hr)
	6.6.: Animal Justice in Medicine	Lecture (1 hr)
	Tutorials 11 and 12: Organ Markets and Animal/Human Justice	Tutorial (2 hr)

Attendance and class requirements

Given the circumstances surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic and the continuing disruptions in its wake, we understand that things can get in the way.

It is essential that you attend tutorials and actively participate in the discussion. Attendance of at least 80% of tutorials is required for passing this Unit of Study. It is your responsibility to ensure that your name is taken on the attendance roll. If you cannot attend, please contact your tutor to organise alternative arrangements. If this is not possible, please seek special consideration.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

All readings and suggested readings will be posted to their respective sections on the unit webpage at Canvas. The reading for each week should be done in advance of your lecture and tutorial, in order to allow you to participate fully in discussions and exercises.

Learning outcomes

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

Outcomes
Graduate qualities

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

LO1. recognise and describe key ethical issues that arise in the biological sciences and in medicine
LO2. pose critical questions about episodes in science where ethical issues are at stake
LO3. pose well-defended arguments (both written and verbal) in favour of particular positions in current ethical debates in science
LO4. evaluate the relative merits of competing ethical arguments and appreciate the complexity of ethical situations
LO5. critically reflect on how values influence your interactions with the biological sciences and medicine, and your personal responsibilities as a future scientist, clinician, citizen, patient, or consumer of science.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1	Depth of disciplinary expertise Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.
GQ2	Critical thinking and problem solving Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.
GQ3	Oral and written communication Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.
GQ4	Information and digital literacy Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.
GQ5	Inventiveness Generating novel ideas and solutions.
GQ6	Cultural competence Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.
GQ7	Interdisciplinary effectiveness Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.
GQ8	Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.
GQ9	Influence Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes	Graduate qualities
Learning outcomes

Responding to student feedback

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Assessment changes and learning activity modifications.

Additional information

A note on intensive classes

Each lecture block is 3.5 hours long (including breaks). These lectures are not mandatory. Having said this, it is highly recommended that you either attend in person or watch the lecture as it goes out live as this is your opportunity to ask questions, engage in the discussion and so on. This is especially important in intensive classes, as the course is packed into only a few weeks. I impress upon you: at least watch the lectures. It’s very easy to get lost early on otherwise.

Student email

It is your responsibility to regularly check your University of Sydney email account or establish a forwarding address on the Sydney system, because this is the primary means of contact for us with you and more generally for the University about your unit of study. If something goes wrong for you because you have not accessed your university email account you will not be excused.

Also be sure to check into the discussion board regularly for class announcements.

Discussion board

The course discussion board is where you should first post whatever questions you may have about the course (whether about content or administration) before emailing the coordinator. In addition the Canvas site for Bioethics contains answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about the course, as well as tips regarding assignments, etc.

It is important that you understand that June Intensive is actually quite intense (as the name implies), and you should be ready for a lot of information to be packed into not very much time. So, we suggest that you pay attention to the following:

Tips for surviving intensive classes

Watch or attend each and every lecture and be prepared to ask questions. We are covering a lot of ground very quickly, which carries the risk that you could get lost just as quickly. If you are unsure of something, or confused by an argument/topic, ask when it occurs to you rather than waiting to ask later.
Use the discussion board frequently. As noted above, the coordinator will be posting on there relatively regularly, and check it several dozen times per day. If you have any questions or thoughts about the course content or administration, this is where you should place it rather than emailing your tutor etc. It is a valuable resource that you should address.
Ensure that you do all the required readings before class, and consider reading recommend sources should you have the time. We know that there is a lot of content to cover, and this can seem daunting, but keep in mind that intensive courses cover the same amount of material as ordinary courses—they are just run in a shorter timeframe. The University expects that every course worth 6 credit points should require the same amount of work, regardless of the length of the semester. Furthermore, there is a good chance you won’t be able to understand the lectures without having done the readings.
Engage with the course, and spend time doing extra reading. As noted below, there will be supplementary readings available, and we suggest that you read beyond these. To do well in this course you should be reading as much as possible!
Don’t fall behind! The danger with intensive classes is that if you fall behind early you will remain behind the whole time. Keep on top of the readings, lectures and tutorials and you should do just fine.

A note on absent fails

Something you may not be aware of is the University policy regarding Absent Fails (AFs). Despite the name, this rule does not apply only in those cases where you do not attend the requisite classes for the course. To be clear, you risk an absent fail if you fail to hand in any of the written assignments, or fail to attend the required tutorials without special consideration.

The following is worth reiterating: you must attempt all assessment tasks set in this class. You cannot do only a few of the assignments and expect to pass—all assessment tasks (essays/exegesis and participation) must be honestly attempted before the cut-off date. If you do not attempt all assessment tasks in this class you will receive an absent fail. Also note that it is not the job of the coordinator to chase you up and let you know that you are risking an AF. It is your responsibility.

Problems with grading

If you believe that your work has been graded unfairly or otherwise improperly, you should in the first instance contact Dr Fehross. Please see the HPS Canvas portal for details of the HPS remarking policy and follow them carefully. Bear in mind that all remarking is done ‘blind’ (i.e. the person doing the remarking does not know the original mark nor the name of the student). This means you could end up with a lower mark than the one you began with.

If you want to appeal your mark after this process, please see: https://canvas.sydney.edu.au/courses/7114/pages/coursework-studies

A note on websites

Note that you are expected to use scholarly sources for your assignments. More specifically, you must use peer-reviewed sources. It is for this reason that the only website you go to is the Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (https://plato.stanford.edu). This is a genuinely peer reviewed resource, and is very useful for getting an in-depth analysis of issues in philosophy, as well as finding articles/books that relate to the topics in class. All other websites (up to, and including, the BBC Ethics section, Wikipedia, Hansard and Senate inquiries, the Internet Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, the New Advent Catholic Encyclopaedia, and so on) do not qualify as academic sources for this class. This is because they do not exhibit the standards of academic rigour exemplified by the peer review process.

Of course, some exceptions exist.

First, you can go to news websites to find real-life examples of cases that may help illustrate your points. E.g. the case of Terri Schiavo might offer a useful way to introduce topics regarding assisted dying.

Second, if your argument relies upon empirical premises, you are well advised to find some evidence that supports your claim, which may be in the media or other sites. You still should be sure that the statistics or evidence you cite are reliable, as you will have to provide some evidence as to why we should take the evidence the way you suggest. For example, if you make a claim that Belgium has seen a decrease in suicides since euthanasia legislation was enacted, you should cite empirical studies that demonstrate this link.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.

Current students

Overview

Overview

Unit details and rules

Teaching staff

Assessment

Assessment

Assessment summary

Assessment criteria

Late submission

Academic integrity

Learning support

Learning support

Simple extensions

Special consideration

Using AI responsibly

Weekly schedule

Weekly schedule

Attendance and class requirements

Study commitment

Required readings

Learning outcomes

Learning outcomes

Graduate qualities

Outcome map

Responding to student feedback

Responding to student feedback

Additional information

Additional information

Disclaimer

On this page

Useful links

Media

Student links

About us

Connect

Current students

HPSC1000: Bioethics

Intensive June, 2022 [Block mode] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

Overview

Overview

Unit details and rules

Teaching staff

Assessment

Assessment

Assessment summary

Assessment criteria

Late submission

Academic integrity

Learning support

Learning support

Simple extensions

Special consideration

Using AI responsibly

Weekly schedule

Weekly schedule

Attendance and class requirements

Study commitment

Required readings

Learning outcomes

Learning outcomes

Graduate qualities

Outcome map

Responding to student feedback

Responding to student feedback

Additional information

Additional information

Disclaimer

On this page

Useful links

Media

Student links

About us

Connect