Skip to main content
Unit outline_

HPSC3107: Science, Ethics and Society

Semester 2, 2020 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

(This unit will not be available from 2021) Science and technology are powerful modern institutions, and they are social endeavours, undertaken and often contested by different groups of people in different historical, cultural, political, and geographical contexts. These social underpinnings are the subject of this course. What does it mean to say scientific knowledge is socially constructed? How does science relate to social and political values? Can scientific facts simply be independent of these values? Should they be independent? Scientific knowledge is often difficult to understand without years of training, and yet this knowledge is crucial to social welfare and to political and environmental futures. So how should publics relate to scientific knowledge? We investigate sociological and ethical issues related to modern science, technology, and medicine, and we develop different approaches to thinking critically about what it means to live in a society so profoundly bound up with the methods and results of the long historical process of scientific knowledge-making. Topics include scientific expertise in public policy and law; fact/value distinctions; industrial science; human/non-human animals and recent biomedical challenges to human self-understandings; scientific and legal constructions of human difference; and recent global challenges that are both social and scientific in nature, in particular environmental change.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit History and Philosophy of Science Academic Operations
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
(HPSC2100 or HPSC2900) and (HPSC2101 or HPSC2901)
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
HPSC3022 or HPSC3024 or HPSC2011
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Daniela Helbig, daniela.helbig@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Participation Reading Room participation
Classroom participation and reading questions
15% Ongoing 1hr plus preparation time (2-3hrs)/week
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
Assignment Final essay
Essay
30% STUVAC 2,500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
Assignment Short essay
Essay
15% Week 06 1000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO4 LO3 LO2
Assignment Podcast
podcast recording on Aboriginal knowledges
15% Week 09 up to 15 min
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Assignment Weekly quiz
quiz on lecture content
10% Weekly up to 20 min
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2
Assignment Forum
different weekly online tasks
15% Weekly approx. 1hr
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5

Assessment summary

  • Quizzes: Your basic knowledge and understanding of the course material as presented in lectures, tutorials, and readings will be assessed in ten weekly online quizzes.
  • Short essay: The assignment requires you to write a short essay on a theme related to the course demonstrating your ability to analyse material from the recent history of science in light of the course readings and methodological approaches. You will then also provide constructive feedback on a fellow student's essay, highlighting problems and/or strengths.
  • Final essay: Your final essay will be analysis of a scientific controversy. This essay builds your research skills by requiring you to identify a controversy, a suitable analytic approach, and to develop your argument.
  • Tutorial participation (in-class and online): In classroom tutorials and in online tutorial activities, you will engage critically and constructively with the course material, and with your fellow students' contribution to the discussion. Participation is judged on preparedness, and contributions to discussions as well as small group work, and to online activities. Unprepared attendance will be marked down.

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO2
Merton's functionalism Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 02 Troubles with the simple picture Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO2
Trust in Science Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 03 Public Understanding: The Deficit Model Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO2
Science and Expertise Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4
Week 04 Producing Doubt Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO2
Invasive species and the bushfire crisis Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 05 Co-production Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO5
Climate change and co-production Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO5
Week 06 Western Science? Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
The Hermannsburg experiments Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 07 Indigenous Fire Management Lecture (1 hr) LO3 LO4 LO5
Telescopes and stories: doing astronomy Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 08 The Dark Emu Controversy Lecture (1 hr) LO3 LO4 LO5
The Dark Emu controversy and settlers' diaries Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 09 Moral Authority of Nature? Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO3 LO4 LO5
The Atomic Bomb Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 10 Nazi science and the Nuremberg Code Lecture (1 hr) LO4 LO5
America's Nuremberg: the Tuskegee study Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO4 LO5
Week 11 Free, prior, informed consent: economic realities Lecture (1 hr) LO3 LO4 LO5
FPIC: collective consent Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 12 Anthropocene Ethics Lecture (1 hr) LO3 LO4 LO5
Dingoes: classification, conservation, care. Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO4 LO5
Week 13 Assessing risk on long time scales. In class-film screening and discussion: Containment Lecture and tutorial (2 hr)  
Concluding discussion Lecture (1 hr)  

Attendance and class requirements

This course requires weekly online activities. These include a weekly quiz on lecture content, reading questions, and additional online tasks that vary week by week. Submission of online activities during at least 10 out of 12 weeks is required for passing this unit of study.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Weekly mandatory readings on e-reserve.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Recognise, and reflect critically on problems that are both social and scientific in nature
  • LO2. Discuss basic approaches and ideas with regard to the place of science in society, relations between science and the public, and the role of experts
  • LO3. Understand some of the social and political implications of the concept of 'modern Western science,' and reflect on the relations, similarities and differences between different knowledge traditions
  • LO4. Recognise the lasting importance of the history of science for research ethics, and discuss examples of normative judgments embedded in research practices
  • LO5. Present coherent arguments about the relationship of science to society, the relation between 'Western' science and Indigenous knowledges, and ethical issues related to developments in modern science and its applications

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Changes made to accommodate fully online teaching (podcast rather than in-class presentation).

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.