Skip to main content
Unit outline_

INFS6024: Managing Data at Scale

Semester 2, 2021 [Normal evening] - Remote

As the amount of data generated continues to grow dramatically, managing data at scale presents a set of challenges for which organizations have to be uniquely prepared. This unit provides students with what they need to know about generating, collecting, processing, storing, managing, analysing and interpreting data. The unit provides an understanding of the importance of data strategies, data governance and data quality, challenges associated with data protection, privacy and security, data management practices, and modern platforms and architecture to streamline data operations within an organisation. Students learn the importance of confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data in mitigating information risks and emergent issues around data ethics.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Business Information Systems
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Manoj Thomas, manoj.thomas@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment group assignment Group Discussion
Group Discussion
20% Multiple weeks n/a
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO6
Small continuous assessment In-class assessment
n/a
20% Multiple weeks n/a
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO4 LO3
Assignment Individual project
n/a
15% Week 07 2500
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Assignment group assignment Group project report
n/a
25% Week 11 5000
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
Presentation group assignment Group project presentation
Presentation
15% Week 11 n/a
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Skills-based evaluation Self-paced workshop
n/a
5% Week 11 n/a
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO4
group assignment = group assignment ?
Group assignment with individually assessed component = group assignment with individually assessed component ?

Assessment summary

Individual project:

Quizzes:

Group project report:

Group project presentation:

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

Awarded when you demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at an exceptional standard, as defined by grade descriptors or exemplars outlined by your faculty or school. 

Distinction

75 - 84

Awarded when you demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at a very high standard, as defined by grade descriptors or exemplars outlined by your faculty or school.

Credit

65 - 74

Awarded when you demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at a good standard, as defined by grade descriptors or exemplars outlined by your faculty or school.

Pass

50 - 64

Awarded when you demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at an acceptable standard, as defined by grade descriptors or exemplars outlined by your faculty or school. 

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction and Importance of Managing Data at Scale Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO4
Week 02 Planning and Design in Data Lifecycle Management Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 03 Enabling and Maintaining Data: Part 1 Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 04 Enabling and Maintaining Data: Part 2 Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 05 Using and Enhancing Data Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 06 Workshop Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO5 LO6
Week 07 Data Quality Management Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 08 Data Ethics Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 09 Data Protection, Privacy, Security and Risks Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 10 Data Governance and Maturity Assessment Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6
Week 11 Workshop Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO5 LO6
Week 12 Group Project Presentations Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 13 Group Project Presentations Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO4 LO5 LO6

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Analyse, identify, and define organisational data management challenges based on theory and practice
  • LO2. Propose and justify data management strategies for a small-scale data management project by simulating real-world organisational scenarios
  • LO3. Evaluate data-related systems, processes, components, and outcomes by applying theoretical concepts and knowledge of best practices
  • LO4. Explain principles of data protection, privacy, security and data ethics
  • LO5. Function effectively in a team to accomplish a common goal
  • LO6. Communicate and engage orally and verbally in a professional manner

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

This is the first time this unit has been offered

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.