Skip to main content
Unit outline_

ITLN3679: Filming Fiction: The Italian Experience

Semester 1, 2022 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

An examination of the relationship between Italian cinema and fiction. Do they speak a common language? Do they employ comparable techniques? Who copies whom? This unit investigates these and other questions by analysing the adaptation of selected contemporary Italian novels into film.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Italian Studies
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
12 credit points at 1000 level or 2000 level or 3000 level from Italian Studies or 6 credit points at 1000 level or 2000 level or 3000 level from Italian Studies and 6 credit points at 2000 level from: Arabic Language and Cultures or Asian Studies or Chinese Studies or English or European Studies or Film Studies or French and Francophone Studies or Germanic Studies or International and Comparative Literacy Studies or Modern Hebrew or Indonesian Studies or Italian Studies or Japanese Studies or Korean Studies or Modern Greek Studies or Spanish and Latin American Studies
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
ITLN3706
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Giorgia Alu, giorgia.alu@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Final Essay
Final Essay
40% Formal exam period
Due date: 06 Jun 2022 at 23:00
2500 wds
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Assignment Take-Home Assignment
Long answer/Essay
30% Week 09
Due date: 26 Apr 2022 at 23:00
2000 wds
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
Participation Participation
Class discussion; preparation of readings.
10% Weekly Weekly
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO3 LO2
Presentation Presentation
Individual or group presentation
20% Weekly 1500wds
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO4 LO3

Assessment summary

Please see full outline and programme on Canvas

Assessment criteria

Please see unit programme.

 

Criteria

 

HIGH DISTINCTION (85+  A+)

Work of exceptional standard, showing an excellent understanding of the issues and excellent analytical ability. Capacity to evaluate critically the issues and see their implications. Very well documented through both compulsory and additional readings, very well structured and very well written.

 

DISTINCTION  (75-84 A-/A)

Work of a superior standard, showing a very good understanding of the issues and very good analytical ability. Good attempt to evaluate critically the issues and to offer some new insights into them.  Well documented through both compulsory and additional readings, well structured and well written.

 

HIGH CREDIT  (70-74  B+)

Highly competent work, based on comprehensive, accurate and relevant information gained from the bibliography.  Sound grasp of the subject matter and appreciation of the key issues, and good analytical ability.  Some capacity to engage critically with the issues.  Well written and properly documented.

 

LOW CREDIT  (65-69  B)

Competent work, based on fairly accurate information gained from the bibliography.  

Ability to take a stand in relation to the various issues and to organise material constructively and productively, even if not originally or independently from sources.  Coherent and sustainable argument, although some points are not presented convincingly, and properly documented.

HIGH PASS  (64-60  B-)

Work showing a reasonable command of the subject matter based on the information gained from the bibliography.  Ability to focus on and discuss the main issues and to summarise the relevant arguments offering some evaluation. Comprehensible argument, in spite of some weaknesses of clarity and structure, and sufficiently documented.

 

MEDIUM PASS  (59-55  C+)

Work showing a limited understanding of the subject matter and of the readings. Ability to summarise the main issues showing a genuine attempt to avoid paraphrasing and to evaluate various opinions. Attempts to mount an argument, in spite of weaknesses in particular areas, and sufficiently documented.

 

LOW PASS  (54-50  C)

Work of barely acceptable standard, with very limited understanding of the subject matter and of the readings.  Inability to summarise the main issues and evidence of paraphrase and dependence on the sources. Attempts to organise the material comprehensibly, with several weaknesses of organisation, style and presentation, and poorly documented.

 

FAIL  (below 50  C-)

Unacceptable work, with lack of understanding of the main issues and inability to summarise from the sources. Unacceptable level of paraphrase bordering on plagiarism or evidence of plagiarism.  Poorly written and documented, and badly presented.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

Faculty policy

Academic integrity

The Current Student website  provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.  

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

You may only use artificial intelligence and writing assistance tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator, and if you do use them, you must also acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section.

Studiosity is permitted for postgraduate units unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Weekly Italian literature and cinema. Adaptation and film studies. Please see full programme and details on Canvas. Lecture and tutorial (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5

Attendance and class requirements

Please see Faculty Policy

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Please see full programme and reading list on Canvas

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Critically analyze and contextualize the similarities and differences between the languages of cinema and literary fiction.
  • LO2. Identify new perspectives for the study and interpretation of Italian literary texts and cinema.
  • LO3. Critically analyse the migration of stories and ideas across different historical, geographical and generic areas.
  • LO4. Assess and evaluate comparative tools for the critical analysis of socio-cultural phenomena.
  • LO5. Command an advanced vocabulary and theoretical framework for: the discussion and elaboration of ideas; written communication; critical thinking.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Students' feedback on the unit will be discussed during the Semester, through informal questionnaire and via final Student Evaluation at the end of the Semester.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.