Skip to main content
Unit outline_

JAZZ3618: Jazz Musicology and Analysis

Semester 1, 2023 [Normal day] - Remote

This unit aims to provide students with an historic overview of the development of the field of jazz studies and the emergence of key musicological paradigms that continue to frame contemporary jazz scholarship. In turn, it will introduce students to the most prevalent analytical approaches used to study jazz works and help them make sense of these approaches in relation to the aims of different jazz researchers. By the end of the unit, students will be able to frame new research questions about particular jazz phenomenon in relation to strains of existing musicological discourse and answer these questions using appropriate analytical tools.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Jazz
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
JAZZ2017 or JAZZ2624
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Hilary Geddes, hilary.geddes@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Presentation Seminar presentation
Oral presentation
30% Multiple weeks 15 minutes
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO3 LO2
Participation Tutorial participation/demonstrated knowledge of required reading
Participation
20% Ongoing Ongoing
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO3 LO2
Assignment Research essay
Essay
50% Please select a valid week from the list below
Due date: 05 Jun 2023 at 23:59
3000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3

Assessment summary

  • Tutorial participation/demonstrated knowledge of required reading: Students are expected to come to this seminar both on time and prepared. Evidence of preparation may include marginalia, insightful criticism or support of positions put forward in the required reading and questions that seek to develop a critical understanding of theoretical concepts outlined in assigned texts. Demonstrated knowledge will be assessed both formally (by way of circle quizzes) and informally (during the course of group discussions). 
  • Seminar presentation: Each student will present an analysis of a particular jazz work (or collection of works). The presentation must include a rationale for the selection of the work(s) as well as an argument for why the particular analytical lens has been used. Students are required to use a “State of Play­, Gap, ­Filling the Gap, ­So What?” argument formulation in the organisation of these presentations.
  • Research essay: Students will be required to write an essay contextualising and analysing a jazz work, or a series of jazz works. The essay must make the author’s theoretical orientation clear and convincingly argue for the appropriateness of utilizing such a theoretical bent. Superior essays will demonstrate original and innovative methodologies. The analytical component of the essay will likely include a combination of verbal discussion of the music, schematics and notated examples designed in accordance with the conventions discussed in class. Use of non­academic online sources is discouraged.

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The following marking rubric will be used for the presentation assignment in this unit of study:

1 2 3

4

5

Components

     

 

 

State of play: You have engaged with a range of evidence, some of which must be scholarly, that paints a clear picture of current thinking or debates around your topic.
     

 

 

Gap: You have interpreted the evidence presented in your state of play and identified a paradox or problem. If this is an aesthetic problem (for those doing PBR projects), you have set out a rationale for your aesthetic vision (i.e. what you want to achieve and why).
     

 

 

Analysis: You have unpacked a musical work or musical process in a way that sheds new light on its significance. The data you have selected for analysis is appropriate and the way you interpret it addresses the problem or paradox set out in your “gap.”
     

 

 

Significance: You have connected your findings back to the state of play. You have articulated how what you have done either changes the landscape of what is known or the methodological possibilities of how we might go about knowing/learning things.
     

 

 

Presentation: You have spoken eloquently and taken us through your analysis with relevant and well designed visual/sonic aids. Your PowerPoint slides make sense and help you tell a coherent story.

The following assessment criteria are used for the research essay assignment in this unit of study:

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

Demonstrates high level of initiative in research and reading; sophisticated critical analysis of evidence; high level engagement with theoretical issues, innovative use of reading/research material and impressive command of underlying debates and assumptions; properly documented and written with style, originality and precision.

Distinction

75 - 84

Demonstrates initiative in research and wide, appropriate reading; complex understanding of question and ability to critically review material in relation to underlying assumptions and values; analyses material in relation to empirical and theoretical contexts; properly documented; clear, well-developed structure and argument with some signs of literary style.

Credit

65 - 74

Evidence of broader understanding than pass level; offers synthesis with some critical evaluation of material; coherent argument using a range of relevant evidence; some evidence of independent thought, good referencing. A high credit (70-74) shows some evidence of ability to problematise and think conceptually.

Pass

50 - 64

Written work meets basic requirements in terms of reading/research; relevant material; tendency to descriptive summary rather than critical argument; makes a reasonable attempt to avoid paraphrasing; reasonably coherent structure; often has weaknesses in particular areas, especially in terms of narrow or underdeveloped treatment of question; acceptable documentation.

Fail

0 - 49

Work may fail for any or all of the following reasons: Unacceptable paraphrasing; irrelevance of content; poor spelling; poor presentation; grammar or structure so sloppy it cannot be understood; failure to demonstrate understanding of content; insufficient or overlong word length.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Paradoxes and musical mysteries: What is musicology and how does it make the world a better place? Seminar (2 hr) LO1
Week 02 Sophisticated or primal? Understanding the roots of contemporary jazz studies Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 03 Eurological vs. Afrological approaches to jazz studies Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 04 New jazz studies Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 05 Global studies in jazz Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 06 Intersectionality in jazz research Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 07 Practice based research Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 08 Comparative/contextual jazz research Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 09 Analysis workshop Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 11 Student presentations Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 12 Student presentations Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 13 Student presentations Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3

Attendance and class requirements

  • Lecture recording: Lectures for this unit of study will be recorded and made available to students via Canvas.
  • Attendance: Students are expected to attend a minimum of 90% of timetabled activities for a unit of study, unless granted exemption by the Dean, Head of School or professor most concerned. The Dean, Head of School or professor most concerned may determine that a student fails a unit of study because of inadequate attendance. Alternatively, at their discretion, they may set additional assessment items where attendance is lower than 90%.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

  • Week 1: Du Bois, W.E.B. (1903) Of The Sorrow Songs. In W.E.B. Du Bois, The Souls of Black Folk (pp. 189-200). Chicago: A.C McClurg and Co.
  • Week 2: Group 1: Blesh, R. (1946) Black Music. In R. Blesh, Shining Trumpets (pp. 3-24). New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Group 2: Ulanov, B. (1952) What is jazz?, A History of Jazz in America (pp. 3-8). New York: Viking Press. 
  • Week 3: Group 1: Schuller, G. (1958) Sonny Rollins and the Challenge of Thematic Improvisation. The Jazz Review, 1(1), 6-11, 21. Group 2: Jones, L. (1963) Jazz and the White Critic. Down Beat, 30(23), 16-17, 34. 
  • Week 4: DeVeaux, S. (1991) Constructing the Jazz Tradition: Jazz Historiography. Black American Literature Forum, 25(3), 525-560.
  • Week 5: Atkins, T. (2001) Our Thing: Defining “Japanese Jazz.” In T. Atkins Blue Nippon: Authenticating Jazz in Japan (pp. 221-264). Durham: Duke University Press. AND ALSO READ: Evans, S. (2014) Expressive Identity in the Voices of Three Australian Saxophonists: McGann, Sanders and Gorman. Jazz Research Journal, 8(1-2), 257-276. 
  • Week 6: Monson, I. (2008) Fitting the Part. In N.T. Rustin and S. Tucker Big Ears: Listening for Gender in Jazz Studies (pp. 267-287). Durham: Duke University Press. AND ALSO READ: Tucker, S. (2008) When did Jazz go Straight? Critical Studies in Improvisation/Études critiques en improvisation, 4(2), 1–16.
  • Week 7: Barker, S. (2015) Two Streams. In S. Barker Korean and the Western Drumset: Scattering Rhythms (pp. 1-20). Farnham: Ashgate.
  • Week 8: Givan, B. (2014). Gunther Schuller and the Challenge of Sonny Rollins: Stylistic Context, Intentionality, and Jazz Analysis. Journal of the American Musicological Society, 61(1), 167-237.
  • Week 9: Required Preparation: Identify a piece or collection of works you would like to analyze; On a piece of paper, write 5-10 sentences outlining the state of play around the work/s that you wish to engage; On a separate piece of paper, write out your gap and a 5 sentence description of your intended analytical approach. 

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. evaluate the strengths and limitations of various musicological approaches to the study of jazz
  • LO2. rationalise and utilise various analytical approaches to describe jazz phenomenon
  • LO3. develop and answer new research questions on particular jazz topics.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Based on student feedback, more emphasis will be placed on the scaffolding of research skills in this semester.
  • Disability Services: The University is committed to supporting students to achieve their best possible results. The University’s Disability Services offer a range of services and adjustments to minimise the impact of any disability on your learning experience and to optimise your academic success. Please see: http://sydney.edu.au/study/academic-support/disability-support.html for more information and to register for relevant support.
  • Learning analytics: Participation in this unit of study permits the University to use your learning analytics for the purpose of improving your learning.  This includes data from the Canvas website, and the results of the Unit of Study Survey conducted at the end of the semester. Students should complete the Unit of Study Survey at the end of this unit of study.  Comments and survey results are confidential. Only the Unit of Study coordinator, the Associate Dean (Education), and the Head of School and the Dean can view student comments made in this survey.  It is essential that you complete this survey so that we can maintain the highest standards of teaching at the SCM and the University.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.