Skip to main content
Unit outline_

LATN3604: Latin Republican Poetry

Semester 1, 2020 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

This unit expands students' knowledge of the poetry of the Republic and Augustan era through study of one or more important texts from this influential period in Rome's literary history. The focus of the unit will be on the interpretation, literary appreciation and generic and/or historical background of the texts. Language skills will continue to be tested and developed by periodic exercises in unseen translation.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Classics and Ancient History
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
12 credit points at 2000 level in Latin
Corequisites
? 
LATN3600
Prohibitions
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Paul Roche, paul.roche@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Final exam Exam
Exam
45% - 2 hours
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO9 LO8 LO7 LO6 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
Assignment Essay
Essay
45% - 2000wd
Outcomes assessed: LO1
Assignment Unseen translation exercises
Unseen translation exercises
10% - 5 x 100wd
Outcomes assessed: LO1

Assessment summary

  • 2,000 word research essay; topics to be found on Canvas
  • 5 x in-class unseens; we will practice unseens before any are counted for assessment
  • 2-hour exam in formal examination period

Assessment criteria

Fail (Below 50%)

Work not of an acceptable standard.

  • demonstrates very limited ability to translate parts of the Latin of the prescribed texts
  • shows little or no understanding of the content of the prescribed texts
  • demonstrates little awareness of literary features of the literature being studied
  • recognises few grammatical forms
  • recognises only a few words in unprepared passages of Latin verse and a very limited capacity to identify their syntactic relations

Low Pass (50-54%)

Work of an acceptable standard.

  • demonstrates a limited ability to translate parts of the Latin of the prescribed texts
  • shows some understanding of the content of the prescribed texts
  • demonstrates a partial awareness of literary features of the literature being studied
  • recognises some grammatical forms
  • demonstrates knowledge of a number of words in an unprepared passages of Latin verse and some awareness of their syntactic relations

Medium Pass (55-59%)

Work of a satisfactory standard.

  • demonstrates the ability to translate parts of the Latin of the prescribed texts
  • shows understanding of much of the content of the prescribed texts
  • recognises and comments at a basic level on some literary and stylistic features of the literature being studied
  • recognises many grammatical forms and demonstrates a basic understanding of their function
  • presents a translation into English of unprepared passages Latin verse which manages to make sense of some contents even if it shows little understanding of the passage as a whole.

High Pass (60-64%)

Competent work, though Honours is not recommended.

  • demonstrates an ability to translate much of the Latin of the prescribed texts with some accuracy reflecting a basic understanding of the context and intention of the original
  • shows a basic understanding of the content of the prescribed texts
  • demonstrates some general knowledge of literary forms and an awareness of the stylistic features of the literature being studied
  • recognises most grammatical forms and demonstrates a sound understanding of their function
  • presents a translation into English of unprepared passages of Latin verse which shows an understanding of much of the passage being read, but not the passage as a whole.

Low Credit (65-69%)

Competent work of considerable merit, demonstrating potential to complete Honours work, though further development needed to do so successfully.

  • demonstrates an ability to translate the Latin of the prescribed texts into English in a manner which reflects the meaning and tone of the original with accuracy
  • shows knowledge and understanding of the content and the cultural and historical background of the prescribed texts
  • demonstrates a good understanding of the literary qualities and stylistic features of the literature being studied
  • recognises all grammatical forms and demonstrates a thorough understanding of their function
  • presents a generally accurate translation into English of unprepared passages of Latin verse conveying the overall sense of the original.

High Credit (70-74%)

Highly competent work, demonstrating clear capacity to complete Honours successfully.

  • demonstrates an ability to translate the Latin of the prescribed texts into English in a manner which reflects the meaning and tone of the original with accuracy
  • shows knowledge and understanding of the content and the cultural and historical background of the prescribed texts
  • demonstrates a good understanding of the literary qualities and stylistic features of the literature being studied
  • recognises all grammatical forms and demonstrates a thorough understanding of their function
  • presents a generally accurate translation into English of unprepared passages of Latin verse conveying the overall sense of the original

Distinction (75-84%)

Work of a superior standard.

  • demonstrates a superior ability to translate the Classical Greek or Latin of the prescribed texts into English in a manner which closely reflects the meaning and tone of the original
  • shows extensive knowledge and understanding of the content and the cultural and historical background of the prescribed texts
  • demonstrates a thorough understanding and an appreciation of the literary qualities and stylistic features of the literature being studied
  • shows a thorough control of grammatical forms and demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of their functions
  • presents an accurate translation into English of unprepared passages of Latin verse, reflecting the meaning and tone of the original.

High Distinction (85%+)

Work of exceptional standard.

  • demonstrates exceptional proficiency in the translation of the Latin of the prescribed texts into English with unfailing precision and accuracy
  • shows a profound knowledge and understanding of the content and the cultural and historical background of the prescribed texts
  • demonstrates an exceptionally deep understanding and appreciation of the literary qualities and stylistic features of the literature being studied
  • shows a complete mastery of grammatical forms and demonstrates a precise understanding of their functions
  • presents a precise and accurate translation into English of unprepared passages of Latin verse, perfectly reproducing the meaning and tone of the original.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

As per university policy

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Commentaries

Bailey, C. T. Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura Libri sex 3 vols. (Oxford 1947)

Brown, P. M. Lucretius De Rerum Natura III (Warminster 1997)

Kenney, E. J. Lucretius De Rerum Natura Book III 2nd edn (Cambridge 2014)

 

Important collections of studies:

Dudley, D. R (ed.) Lucretius (London 1965)

Gale, M. (ed.) Lucretius: Oxford Readings in Classics Studies (Oxford 2007)

Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. (eds) The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius (Cambridge 2007)

 

Bibliographies

Campbell, G. L. Lucretius (Oxford Bibliographies, 2012)

A Hellenistic Bibliography: Lucretius

https://sites.google.com/site/hellenisticbibliography/latin-authors/lucretius

 

Studies

Asmis, E. ‘Lucretius’ Venus and Stoic Zeus’, Hermes 110 (1982) 458-470

Asmis, E. ‘Epicurean poetics’, in D. Obbink (ed.) Philodemus and poetry: Poetic theory and practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace (Oxford 1995) 15-34

Brown, R. D. ‘Lucretius and Callimachus’, ICS 7 (1982) 77-97

Classen, C. J. ‘Poetry and Rhetoric in Lucretius’, TAPhA 99 (1968) 77-118

Clay, D. Lucretius and Epicurus (Ithaca 1983)

Duban, J. M. ‘Venus, Epicurus and naturae species ratioque’, AJPh 103 (1982) 165-77

Dudley, D. R (ed.) Lucretius (London 1965)

Farrell, J. ‘Lucretian architecture: the structure and arrangement of the De Rerum Natura’, in Gillespie and Hardie 2007: 76-91

Fowler, D. P. ‘Lucretius and Politics’ repr. in Gale 2007: 397-431

Gale, M. R. Myth and Poetry in Lucretius (Cambridge 1994)

Gale, M. (ed.) Lucretius: Oxford Readings in Classics Studies (Oxford 2007)

Gale M. ‘Lucretius and previous poetic traditions’ in Gillespie and Hardie 2007: 59-75

Garani, M. 2007. Empedocles Redivivus: Poetry and analogy in Lucretius (London 2007)

Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. (eds) The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius (Cambridge 2007)

Hardie, P. ‘Lucretius and Later Latin Literature in antiquity’ in Gillespie and Hardie 2007:111-27.

Hardie, P. Lucretian Receptions: History, the Sublime, Knowledge (Cambridge 2009)

Kenney, E. J. ‘Doctus Lucretius’ in Gale 2007: 300-27.

Kenney, E. J. ‘The historical imagination of Lucretius’, G&R 19 (1972) 12-24

Kenney, E. J. Lucretius (Cambridge 1977, repr. 1995)

Kenney, E. J. ‘Lucretian texture: style, metre and rhetoric in the De Rerum Natura’, in Gillespie and Hardie 2007: 92-110

Long, A. A. Hellenistic Philosophy: Stoics, Epicureans, Sceptics (London 1974)

Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N. The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols (Cambridge 1987)

Maguinness, W. S. ‘The language of Lucretius’, in Dudley 1965: 89-93

Markovic, D. The rhetoric of explanation in Lucretius’ De rerum natura (Leiden 2008)

Mayer, R. ‘The epic of Lucretius’ PLIS 6 (1990) 35-43

Minadeo, R. ‘The formal design of the De Rerum Natura’, Arion 4 (1965): 444-61

Murley, C. ‘Lucretius and the history of satire’, TAPhA 70 (1939) 380-95

Rheinhardt, T. ‘The speech of Nature in Lucretius De Rerum Natura 3.912-1075’ JRS 94 (2004) 27-46

Rist, J. M. Epicurus: An Introduction (Cambridge 1972)

Sanders, K. R. ‘Mens and emotion. De Rerum Natura 3.136-46’, CQ 58 (2008) 362-6

Schiesaro, A. ‘The Palingenesis of the De rerum natura’, PCPS 40 (1994) 81-107

Schiesaro, A. ‘Lucretius and Roman Politics and History’ in Gillespie and Hardie 2007: 41-58

Schrijvers, P. H. ‘Seeing the invisible: a study of Lucretius’ use of analogy in the De Rerum Natura’, repr. in Gale 2007: 255-88

Sedley, D. Lucretius and the transformation of Greek wisdom (Cambridge 1998)

Sedley, D. ‘Lucretius’ use and avoidance of Greek’ in Adams, J. N. and Mayer, R. G. (eds) Aspects of the language of Latin Poetry (Oxford 1999) 227-46

Segal, C. Lucretius on Death and Anxiety. Poetry and Philosophy in De Rerum Natura (Princeton 1990)

Snyder, J. M. Puns and poetry in Lucretius’ De rerum natura (Amsterdam 1980)

Volk, K. The poetics of Latin Didactic. Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid, Manilius (Oxford 2002)

Wallach, B. P. Lucretius and the diatribe against the fear of death. De Rerum Natura 3.830-1094 (Leiden 1976)

Waren, J . (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism (Cambridge 2009)

West, D. The imagery and poetry of Lucretius (London 1994)         

Wormell, D. E. W. ‘Lucretius: the personality of the poet’ G&R 7 (1960) 54-65

Wormell, D. E. W. ‘The personal world of Lucretius’ in Dudley 1965: 35-67

 

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Increased knowledge of the Latin language, its structure, vocabulary, and modes of expression.
  • LO2. Increased knowledge of the history and influence of the literature of Rome, including an understanding of genre and of interpretative work ranging from traditional criticism to contemporary approaches
  • LO3. Increased knowledge of the culture, religion, ideas and history of the Romans leading to a critical understanding of one of the bases of Western culture.
  • LO4. Sharpened analytical skills in investigating the ways texts use language to construct meaning and assert imaginative power, communication skills fostered by the writing of critical analyses and by discussion in class where one must clearly express and account for one’s own view and objectively judge the views of others
  • LO5. Practice at skills in working as part of a team, sharing information and exchanging approaches in ways which promote realistic self-evaluation, critical judgement, tolerance and skills in creative listening
  • LO6. Practice at skills in ordering and inter-relating a large body of facts and differing opinions within a limited space
  • LO7. An increased understanding of cultural difference
  • LO8. Practice at skills in time-management, in prioritising and in working to definite goals and dead-lines
  • LO9. Practice at skills in the use of IT for the accessing of information and generating one’s own material

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Over several iterations of this unit I have used student feedback to inform my text choices, adjust the amount and difficulty of the texts read, rebalance assessment weighting, and plan the reading schedule of the unit.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.