Skip to main content
Unit outline_

LAWS3460: Roman Law

Semester 1, 2024 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

The course provides a general introduction to all aspects of Roman private law. It begins with an historical sketch of Roman institutions from the earliest times until the reign of Justinian (CE 527-565), together with an introduction to Roman legal history and the development of Roman legal concepts. It also deals with the reception of Roman jurisprudence into modern European legal systems and the common law. The Roman law of marriage and family, moveable and immoveable property, real and personal security, succession, and contractual, quasi-contractual and delictal obligations are then dealt with in depth. The Institutes of Justinian, in English, is the fundamental text for study and students are expected to read the Institutes in some detail. The Institutes constitute a map of the law and means of ordering the law. Roman law has always been, and still is, of great historical importance in the development of many areas of the common law. Roman law also provides a yardstick by which both the virtues and the shortcomings of the common law can be measured. Further, Roman law forms the jurisprudential background of most of the legal systems in force in continental Europe and those parts of the rest of the world that were colonised by continental European nations.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Law
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
LAWS5160
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Arthur Emmett, arthur.emmett@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Arthur Emmett, arthur.emmett@sydney.edu.au
The census date for this unit availability is 2 April 2024
Type Description Weight Due Length
Supervised exam
? 
Final exam (60%)
Supervised exam on campus
60% Formal exam period 2 hours
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Participation Class Participation (0%)
Minimum 80% attendance required
0% Ongoing Ongoing
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO4 LO3 LO2
Assignment Essay (40%)
Written assessment
40% Week 08
Due date: 19 Apr 2024 at 23:59

Closing date: 26 Apr 2024
3000 words maximum / 8 weeks
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4

Assessment summary

Class Participation (non-weighted): Students must attend a minimum of 80% of classes to be eligible to undertake assessment in this course. Class participation is designed to encourage preparation for class; encourage students to learn, think, analyse, reflect and evaluate legal material prior to covering that content in class; and assist students to develop the capacity to think clearly and to present oral arguments.

 

Essay (40%): Each student is required to submit an essay on the following topic: 

Explain the extent to which the law of England as inherited in New South Wales is indebted to the legislation of Justinian I in the 6th Century AD known as the Corpus Iuris Civilis. Give some examples.

The deadline for essay submission is 23:59 on 19 April 2024 (Sydney, Australia Time).  The maximum length of the assignment is 3000 words, excluding references. Any words in excess of the word limit will not be read or marked.

Suggested Reading:

W.W. Buckland & A.D. McNair, Roman Law and Common Law.

Sir William Holdsworth, The Reception of Roman Law in the Sixteenth Century, 28 LQR 39.   

Sir William Holdsworth, A History of English Law (Methuen, 4th edition).

Thomas Scrutton, The Influence of the Roman Law on the Law of England (Cambridge, 1885).

E Koops & WJ Zwalve, Law and Equity: Approaches in Roman Law and Common Law.

Arthur Emmett, Roman Law and Equity: Some Parallels, (2014) 38 Australian Bar Review 95.

Arthur Emmett, Reception of Roman Law in the Common Law, in “Historical Foundations of Australian Law” – Volume I.

Arthur Emmett, Roman Traces in Australian Law, 20 Australian Bar Review 1.

Arthur Emmett, Succession in Roman Law and the Common Law 50 Australian Bar Review 223.

Arthur Emmett, The Law Merchant:  How We Came To Where We Are in “Constituting Law: Legal Argument and Social Values" (Federation Press) 218.

 

Final exam (60%): The exam will be supervised and held on campus during the university formal exam period. Duration of the exam will be 2 hours writing time, plus 30 minutes reading time. All material covered in class will be examinable.

 

Word limit penalty: A piece of assessment which exceeds the prescribed word limit will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment for every 100 words, or part thereof. The total word count for essay and other written assessments will exclude all footnotes and any bibliography (if required).  

Use of editors or proof-readers: The use of assistance in preparing and editing assessment tasks in this unit of study is strictly prohibited. Assistance includes human and automated writing tools (not including spell checking).

Special consideration: Successful grants of Special Consideration may involve alternative tasks, as appropriate. 

Assessment requirements to pass a unit of study: A student must make a genuine attempt at all assessment tasks set out in this Unit of Study in order to obtain a Pass mark and grade (or above); otherwise an Absent Fail grade will be recorded as the student’s result for this Unit of Study. 

 

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2021 (Schedule 1). 

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

  • Completely answers the question.
  • Contains striking originality of approach or analysis.
  • Demonstrates exhaustive or innovative research (where independent research required).
  • Exceptionally well written, structured and expressed.
  • Is otherwise exceptional in some way.

Distinction

75 - 84

  • Completely answers the question.
  • Achieves a critical and evaluative approach to the issues.
  • Content and structure is well organised in support of the argument.
  • Demonstrates extensive research and analysis to support a well-documented argument.
  • Generally well expressed and free from errors.
  • Has a clear structure and is well articulated.

Credit

65 - 74

  • Covers main issues fairly well in answering the question.
  • Contains no significant errors.
  • Demonstrates an attempted critical approach to the issues.
  • Demonstrates reasonably sound research and analysis in addressing the key issues.
  • Has a clear structure and reasonably clear expression.

Pass

50 - 64

  • Identifies the key issues, but does not follow through with a reasoned argument.
  • Contains some significant errors.
  • Displays satisfactory engagement with the key issues.
  • Offers a descriptive summary of material relevant to the question.
  • Superficial use of material, and may display a tendency to paraphrase.
  • Demonstrates little evidence of in-depth research or analysis.
  • Adequate expression.
  • Overall, demonstrates the minimum level of competence in the assessment and satisfies the requirements to proceed to higher-level studies in the degree or subject area.

Fail

0 - 49

  • Does not answer the question.
  • Contains significant or numerous errors.
  • Few or no identifiable arguments.
  • Content that is inappropriate or irrelevant.
  • Lack of research or analysis.
  • Difficult or impossible to understand through poor grammar, expression or structure.
  • Overall, does not demonstrate the minimum level of competence in the assessment.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

The late submission of a piece of assessment, without an approved extension, will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment per 24 hours or part thereof, after the due time on the due date. For example, a submission after the due time but before the same time the following day will attract a 10% penalty.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Support for students

The Support for Students Policy 2023 reflects the University’s commitment to supporting students in their academic journey and making the University safe for students. It is important that you read and understand this policy so that you are familiar with the range of support services available to you and understand how to engage with them.

The University uses email as its primary source of communication with students who need support under the Support for Students Policy 2023. Make sure you check your University email regularly and respond to any communications received from the University.

Learning resources and detailed information about weekly assessment and learning activities can be accessed via Canvas. It is essential that you visit your unit of study Canvas site to ensure you are up to date with all of your tasks.

If you are having difficulties completing your studies, or are feeling unsure about your progress, we are here to help. You can access the support services offered by the University at any time:

Support and Services (including health and wellbeing services, financial support and learning support)
Course planning and administration
Meet with an Academic Adviser

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Historical Introduction: Historical Periods of Rome, the Republican Constitution, Sources of Law Under the Republic Lecture (4 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 02 Historical Introduction: The “Constitution” under the Empire, Sources of Law Under The Empire Lecture (4 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 03 Historical Introduction: Legal Science, Justinian, Roman Law after Justinian Lecture (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 04 Substantive Roman Law: The Law of Persons, the Law of Property Lecture (4 hr) LO4
Week 05 Substantive Roman Law: The Law of Obligations Generally, the Law of Contracts Lecture (4 hr) LO4
Week 07 Substantive Roman Law: Specific Contracts, Privity and Agency in Roman Law, Innominate Contracts, Quasi-Contract Lecture (4 hr) LO4
Week 08 Substantive Roman Law: The Law of Delict Lecture (4 hr) LO4
Week 10 Substantive Roman Law: Testate Succession, Trusts Lecture (4 hr) LO4
Week 11 Substantive Roman Law: Intestate Succession, Universal Succession inter vivos Lecture (4 hr) LO4
Week 12 Substantive Roman Law: The Law of Actions, Criminal Procedure Lecture (4 hr) LO4

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance: All students are required to attend 80% of classes (or as otherwise specified by the Unit Coordinator) to satisfy the pass requirements for each unit of study. Attendance requirements may be satisfied by in person attendance as specified by the Unit Coordinator. Failure to meet this requirement may result in a student being precluded from sitting the final assessment.  

Referencing: The Sydney Law School expects you to use the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (4th edition, 2018) for your footnoting style, although you should confirm this with your lecturer, and a link to the library website where this is set out comprehensively is available at Referencing and Citation Styles: AGLC4  

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Peter Birks and Grant McLeod, Justinian’s Institutes (Duckworth, 1987)

George Mousourakis, Fundamentals of Roman Private Law (Springer, 2012)

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. demonstrate understanding of a historical sketch of Roman institutions from the earliest times until the reign of Justinian (common era 527-565)
  • LO2. demonstrate at an introductory level, an understanding of Roman legal history and the development of Roman legal concepts
  • LO3. be familiar with the reception of Roman jurisprudence into modern European legal systems and the common law
  • LO4. understand the Roman law of marriage and family, moveable and immoveable property, real and personal security, succession, and contractual, quasi-contractual and delictal obligations.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

The Essay Topic has changed.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.