Skip to main content
Unit outline_

LAWS5000: Foundations of Law

Semester 1, 2022 [Normal evening] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

This unit of study is designed to provide students with a foundation for the study of law. It introduces students to the operation of the Australian legal system and the interaction of the courts and parliaments in a federal system. The unit has a practical focus of building skills of legal reasoning and analysis, with a particular focus on case analysis and statutory interpretation, and an introduction to legal problem solving. These practical skills are necessary to complete a law degree. This unit of study also includes an overview of the sources of law in the Australian legal system in its historical context, and an introduction to fundamental concepts of law. In doing so, it provides opportunities for critical engagement in debates about the role of law in Australia, including issues of law affecting indigenous peoples in Australia. Active class participation and discussion based on pre-reading is an essential aspect of the seminars.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Law
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
LAWS1000 or LAWS1006
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Jesse Cunningham, jesse.cunningham@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Jesse Cunningham, jesse.cunningham@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Participation Class participation
Seminar engagement and contributions
10% Ongoing n/a
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO6 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
In-semester test (On-campus supervised) Case analysis and commentary exam
Case analysis and commentary exercise
40% Week 09
Due date: 26 Apr 2022 at 18:00
3 hours
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Assignment Essay
Essay
50% Week 13
Due date: 27 May 2022 at 23:59
2500 words / 28 days
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6

Assessment summary

Class Participation (10%):

Half of the assessment for this unit is comprised of in-class activities. Further information about these activities can be found on Canvas. Participation in these activities will be primarily assessed as attendance to them. The seminar leader actively observes the group-work to gauge evidence of preparation and engagement. The assigned weighting of this element of the assessment is consistent with the particular mode of delivery of the unit as face-to-face, mostly student-driven discussion of the content and issues.

In-Semester Test Case Analysis Exercise: (40%):

The major portion of this (40% of the overall assessment weighting) is a three-hour in-class case analysis. Students are given an edited case to read and analyse, through set questions, under exam conditions. The in-class activity will commence at 6pm on Monday 26 April and conclude at 9pm on 26 April. For approved ‘Special Consideration’ applications, a replacement exam is provided. 

Essay (50%):

The major essay task, released on 29 April and due at the end of Week 13, is an opportunity for students to practice their research and analytical writing skills by exploring in more detail a theme relating to the foundations of law. A number of specific topics are suggested, and students are encouraged to apply their learning from the set reading materials and pursue their interests through wider reading. For approved ‘Special Consideration’ applications, an extension is allowed. 

All ‘learning outcomes’ are relevant to all assesment items.

Assessment requirement to pass a unit of study

A student must make a genuine attempt at all assessment tasks set out in this Unit of Study in order to obtain a Pass mark and grade (or above); otherwise an Absent Fail grade will be recorded as the student’s result for this Unit of Study.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

• Completely answers the question.
• Contains striking originality of approach or analysis.
• Demonstrates exhaustive or innovative research (where independent research
required).
• Exceptionally well written, structured and expressed.
• Is otherwise exceptional in some way.

Distinction

75 - 84

• Completely answers the question.
• Achieves a critical and evaluative approach to the issues.
• Content and structure is well organised in support of the argument.
• Demonstrates extensive research and analysis to support a well-documented
argument.
• Generally well expressed and free from errors.
• Has a clear structure and is well articulated.

Credit

65 - 74

• Covers main issues fairly well in answering the question.
• Contains no significant errors
• Demonstrates an attempted critical approach to the issues.
• Demonstrates reasonably sound research and analysis in addressing the key issues.
• Has a clear structure and reasonably clear expression.

Pass

50 - 64

• Identifies the key issues, but does not follow through with a reasoned argument.
• Contains some significant errors.
• Displays satisfactory engagement with the key issues.
• Offers descriptive summary of material relevant to the question.
• Superficial use of material, and may display a tendency to paraphrase.
• Demonstrates little evidence of in-depth research or analysis.
• Adequate expression.
• Overall, demonstrates the minimum level of competence in the assessment and
satisfies the requirements to proceed to higher-level studies in the degree or subject
area.

Fail

0 - 49

• Does not answer the question.
• Contains significant or numerous errors.
• Few or no identifiable arguments.
• Content that is inappropriate or irrelevant.
• Lack of research or analysis.
• Difficult or impossible to understand through poor grammar, expression or
structure.
• Overall, does not demonstrate the minimum level of competence in the
assessment.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

The late submission of a piece of assessment, which has not been granted an extension, will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment per calendar day or part thereof.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction: Law as the Pursuit of 'Foundations' Seminar (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 02 Development of Law's 'Artificial Reason' Seminar (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 03 Cases and Precedent 1 Seminar (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 04 Cases and Precedent 2 Seminar (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 05 Statutory Interpretation 1 Seminar (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 06 Statutory Interpretation 2 Seminar (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 07 Rule of Law 1 Seminar (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 08 Rule of Law 2 Seminar (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 09 Case Analysis Assessment Seminar (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 10 Laws and Values 1; Native Title Seminar (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 11 Laws and Values 2; Law's Narratives Seminar (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 12 Law & Values 3: Human Rights Seminar (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 13 Review Seminar (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6

Attendance and class requirements

  • Attendance: All students are required to attend 70% of live classes (or as otherwise specified by the Unit Coordinator) to satisfy the pass requirements for each unit of study. Attendance requirements may be satisfied by in person and/or online attendance as per the delivery mode of the class. Failure to meet this requirement may result in a student being precluded from sitting the final assessment.
  • Word count: Any part of a submitted assessment task which exceeds the prescribed word limit will not be read by the examiner. The total word count for written assessments will exclude bibliography; footnote numbers; footnote citation; cover page; and will include body text; headings and sub-headings; quotations; anything other than numbers and citations in footnotes.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

  •  Robin Creyke, David Hamer, Patrick O’Mara, Belinda Smith and Tristan Taylor, Laying Down the Law (LexisNexis Butterworths, 11th ed, 2020). Hard copy available online or from Glebebooks, Glebe. E-book available for purchase from Lexis Nexis website. 

  • Foundations of Law (Juris Doctor) 2022 Reading Materials. Make sure you select the correct reading materials for the stream you are enrolled in either the full time Feb-Mar intensive or the Part-time evening stream as the reading materials for each are different. They are available from the University Copy Centre in the Sydney University Sports and Aquatic Centre, Maze Crescent, Darlington. All materials will also be available online via the “Reading List” page on Canvas but students are strongly advised to obtain a hard copy if possible. 

  • Other required reading set out in the Reading Guide and available on Canvas.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. demonstrate a basic understanding of the Australian legal system and fundamental concepts and debates involving the legal system in Australia
  • LO2. demonstrate a basic understanding of how law is made or changed by case law and legislation in the context of social changes
  • LO3. demonstrate a basic understanding of the respective role of the courts, parliaments and the executive; and the interaction of judge-made law and statutes.
  • LO4. demonstrate a basic understanding of the principles of judicial reasoning and statutory interpretation
  • LO5. develop skills of comprehending and critically analysing primary and secondary materials in law
  • LO6. develop skills of oral and written analysis and communication about legal issues

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

This unit has been continuously developed, taking into account student feedback in previous years and this year will seek to facilitate more interactive exercises in lectures, where possible.

Lectures: Some lectures in 2022 may be pre-recorded and available via the Canvas site. These will be in addition to live timetabled lectures. 

Teacher consultation guidelines: Please contact the lecturer in class or by email. Please use your University of Sydney email address, not a
private email address. Students should provide their student identification number and their full name, as well as any adopted name, when corresponding with academic staff.

 

 

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.