Outline

Overview

The Legal Profession Unit of Study is a mandatory ‘Priestley 11' subject. We critically examine issues relevant to lawyers' role in society: professionalism, lawyers' conduct, lawyers' ethical obligations and choices, and the regulation of legal services. We examine the nature of legal professionalism and its inherent relationship with ethics, values and morals, as well as its relationship with commerce. We explore the shifting profile of the profession, the response of the profession to these demographic changes, and the major cultural and economic forces that operate on legal professionalism and regulation of the profession. From that base we analyse access to justice issues, different notions of lawyering, the structure of the legal profession, and diverse theoretical views and models of regulation. We move on to consider the lawyer-client relationship and strategies to facilitate equality and effective communication in the delivery of legal services. Finally, we examine lawyers' duties to clients and the Court, and the ways in which the rules and principles of confidentiality and conflicts of interest affect the advice and representation lawyers provide for clients. This unit of study requires your active participation in class discussion, and your critical reflection on the issues raised throughout the semester.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit	Law
Credit points	6
Prerequisites ?	None
Corequisites ?	None
Prohibitions ?	LAWS2013
Assumed knowledge ?	None
Available to study abroad and exchange students	No

Teaching staff

Coordinator	Lucy Quinn, lucy.quinn@sydney.edu.au

Type	Description	Weight	Due	Length
Presentation	Group Presentation Presentation	15%	Ongoing	n/a
Outcomes assessed:
Assignment	Final Assignment (short release) Assignment	60%	Week -02 Due date: 08 Feb 2022 at 09:00 Closing date: 15 Feb 2022	Maximum 3,000 words / 4 days
Outcomes assessed:
Assignment	Interim Assignment (short release) Case study and reflection	25%	Week -04 Due date: 27 Jan 2022 at 09:00 Closing date: 03 Feb 2022	Maximum 1,500 words / 13 days
Outcomes assessed:
= group assignment ?

Assessment summary

Group presentation (15%)

Students will be required to work together in groups of up to 6 students. Each group will be assigned a particular topic covered in class, in relation to which they will need to:

Prepare a presentation of up to 15 minutes on a question/prompt/instructions of the lecturer. For the purposes of the presentation students will be required to draw on materials set for class and materials found by way of independent research.
Submit a document of up to 2 pages setting out 5 key resources identified by way independent research and a brief statement as to their relevance to the topic.
Be familiar with the readings set for the topic and prepared to actively contribute to class discussion in relation to that topic.

In the absence of significant and compelling reasons suggesting it is inappropriate in the circumstances, all students in a group will receive the same mark for this piece of assessment. Whether or not significant and compelling reasons exist to allocate different marks to group members will be a decision solely for the course convenor.

This piece of assessment is designed to enhance knowledge of the professional and ethical obligations of lawyers in legal practice and the delivery of legal services, and to engage students in independent research and critical analysis.

Interim assignment – case study and reflection (25%)

The interim assignment will be released at 9am on Friday 14 January, and is due at 9am on Thursday 27 January.

The word limit is 1,500 words.

This task will require students to engage in reflective writing and analysis.

Students will be provided with a case study and asked to engage with materials set for class to reflect on, among other things, the motivation(s) and action(s) of the character(s) in the case study.

This assignment is designed to facilitate engagement with reflective practice, in particular about the role lawyers play in enabling access to justice and on professional and ethical issues relevant to legal practice and the delivery of legal services.

The closing date for this assignment will be 9am on 3 February. A successful Special Consideration application after the closing date will be an alternative assessment piece in the same format or a viva voce requiring similar reflection and analysis.

Final assignment (60%)

The final assignment will be released at 9am on Friday 4 February and will be due at 9am on Tuesday 8 February.

The word limit for the final assignment is 3,000 words.

The final assignment will include a multi-part problem-based question and a question requiring a narrative response.

The assignment is designed to ensure students can talk knowledgeably about the role lawyers play in facilitating access to justice, to understand and explain the source, nature and meaning of lawyers professional and ethical obligations, and know how to identify and address professional and ethical issues in legal practice and legal services delivery. It will also require students to be able to describe the processes for holding lawyers accountable for their actions, and to explain and evaluate the impact of change on lawyering.

The closing date for the assignment will be Tuesday 15 February. A successful Special Consideration application after the closing date will be an alternative assessment piece in a similar format or a viva voce addressing similar issues.

IMPORTANT NOTE: A student must make a genuine attempt at all assessment tasks set out in this Unit of Study in order to obtain a Pass mark and grade (or above); otherwise an Absent Fail grade will be recorded as the student’s result for this Unit of Study.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name	Mark range	Description
High distinction	85 - 100	• Completely answers the question. • Contains striking originality of approach or analysis. • Demonstrates exhaustive or innovative research (where independent research required). • Exceptionally well written, structured and expressed. • Is otherwise exceptional in some way.
Distinction	75 - 84	• Completely answers the question. • Achieves a critical and evaluative approach to the issues. • Content and structure is well organised in support of the argument. • Demonstrates extensive research and analysis to support a well-documented argument. • Generally well expressed and free from errors. • Has a clear structure and is well articulated.
Credit	65 - 74	• Covers main issues fairly well in answering the question. • Contains no significant errors • Demonstrates an attempted critical approach to the issues. • Demonstrates reasonably sound research and analysis in addressing the key issues. • Has a clear structure and reasonably clear expression.
Pass	50 - 64	• Identifies the key issues, but does not follow through with a reasoned argument. • Contains some significant errors. • Displays satisfactory engagement with the key issues. • Offers descriptive summary of material relevant to the question. • Superficial use of material, and may display a tendency to paraphrase. • Demonstrates little evidence of in-depth research or analysis. • Adequate expression. • Overall, demonstrates the minimum level of competence in the assessment and satisfies the requirements to proceed to higher-level studies in the degree or subject area.
Fail	0 - 49	• Does not answer the question. • Contains significant or numerous errors. • Few or no identifiable arguments. • Content that is inappropriate or irrelevant. • Lack of research or analysis. • Difficult or impossible to understand through poor grammar, expression or structure. • Overall, does not demonstrate the minimum level of competence in the assessment.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

A student who has not obtained an extension by applying successfully for Special Consideration will be penalised for late submission of written work at a rate of 5% of the total mark for the assignment per day or part-day (including weekends and public holidays). Penalties for late submission will be strictly applied with no grace-period.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Learning support

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Weekly schedule

WK	Topic	Learning activity
Pre-semester	Introduction to the unit of study and legal ethics; Approaches to ethics and professional responsibility 1	Seminar (4 hr)
	Approaches to ethics and professional responsibility 2; Organizational culture and diversity	Seminar (4 hr)
	Legal Needs, Access to Justice and Delivery of legal services; Communication and interviewing	Seminar (4 hr)
	Regulatory framework in Australia; Admission and readmission	Seminar (4 hr)
	Duties to the court; Duties to the client	Seminar (4 hr)
	Confidentiality and privilege; Conflicts of interest	Seminar (4 hr)
	Duties in specific areas of practice; Law practice management and in-house practice	Seminar (4 hr)
	Complaints and discipline 1; Complaints and discipline 2/Introduction to competence, liability and immunity	Seminar (4 hr)
	Competence, liability and immunity (continued); Technology and the future of lawyering	Seminar (3.5 hr)
	Conclusion and overview; Revision	Seminar (3.5 hr)

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance: There is a 70% attendance requirement in this unit of study, which will be strictly applied. This requirement may be satisfied by online attendance. Failure to meet this requirment may result in a student receiving a Fail grade. Please contact the unit of study Convenor, Ms Lucy Quinn, to discuss any attendance related issues.

Word count: The total word-count for written work excludes the title-page, citations in footnotes and any bibliography, but includes everything else, such as headings, sub-headings, quotations and, even if it does not seem substantive, anything other than citations in footnotes. Failure to comply with the word-limit is penalised at a rate of 5% of the total mark for the assignment for every 100 words in excess of the limit.

Referencing: When citing material in written work, students should rely consistently on an accepted method, such as that specified in the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (4th edition, 2018). For legal referencing help, use this link to the library website: https://libguides.library.usyd.edu.au/c.php?g=508115&p=3476146 .

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

There is no textbook in this unit of study.

The prescribed readings are available online either via the Web or library databases or the “Reading List” page on Canvas.

A detailed reading guide is available on Canvas.

Students are expected to access and read the prescribed readings prior to attending each class and come prepared to engage in class discussion and class activities.

Learning outcomes

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

Outcomes
Graduate qualities

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

LO1. talk knowledgeably about the roles that lawyers play in enabling access to justice
LO2. know and explain the source, nature and meaning of lawyers' essential professional obligations
LO3. identify and address professional and ethical issues in legal practice and in the delivery of legal services
LO4. describe the standards and processes for holding lawyers accountable for their professional behaviour
LO5. explain and evaluate the impact of technology and other societal changes on lawyering, the legal profession and the legal services marketplace
LO6. conduct original legal research, and engage in detailed critical analysis of legal, policy and law reform materials
LO7. engage in reflective practice.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1	Depth of disciplinary expertise Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.
GQ2	Critical thinking and problem solving Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.
GQ3	Oral and written communication Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.
GQ4	Information and digital literacy Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.
GQ5	Inventiveness Generating novel ideas and solutions.
GQ6	Cultural competence Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.
GQ7	Interdisciplinary effectiveness Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.
GQ8	Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.
GQ9	Influence Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes	Graduate qualities
Learning outcomes

Responding to student feedback

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

The teachers welcome student feedback on this unit of study.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.

Current students

Overview

Overview

Unit details and rules

Teaching staff

Assessment

Assessment

Assessment summary

Assessment criteria

Late submission

Academic integrity

Learning support

Learning support

Simple extensions

Special consideration

Using AI responsibly

Weekly schedule

Weekly schedule

Attendance and class requirements

Study commitment

Required readings

Learning outcomes

Learning outcomes

Graduate qualities

Outcome map

Responding to student feedback

Responding to student feedback

Disclaimer

On this page

Useful links

Media

Student links

About us

Connect

Current students

LAWS5009: The Legal Profession

Intensive February, 2022 [Normal day] - Remote

Overview

Overview

Unit details and rules

Teaching staff

Assessment

Assessment

Assessment summary

Assessment criteria

Late submission

Academic integrity

Learning support

Learning support

Simple extensions

Special consideration

Using AI responsibly

Weekly schedule

Weekly schedule

Attendance and class requirements

Study commitment

Required readings

Learning outcomes

Learning outcomes

Graduate qualities

Outcome map

Responding to student feedback

Responding to student feedback

Disclaimer

On this page

Useful links

Media

Student links

About us

Connect