Skip to main content
Unit outline_

LAWS5126: Criminology

Semester 2, 2024 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

This unit of study aims to introduce students to the theoretical issues associated with the definition and explanation of crime, criminality and crime control. Rationales for punishment are examined along with other possible responses to criminal behaviour are explored. The unit considers the impact of criminal justice policy and practice on particular groups which may include juveniles, women, Indigenous people, ethnic minorities and victims of crime. The regulation of particular types of offences such as hate crime are considered. Other topical issues are covered as they arise in contemporary criminological debate.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Law
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
LAWS3426
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Garner Clancey, garner.clancey@sydney.edu.au
The census date for this unit availability is 2 September 2024
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Crime Theory Short Essay (30%)
Crime Theory Short Essay
30% Week 06
Due date: 05 Sep 2024 at 16:00

Closing date: 12 Sep 2024
1500 words / 6 weeks
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Assignment Research Essay Synopsis (0%)
Synopsis of Research Essay topic
0% Week 07
Due date: 12 Sep 2024 at 16:00

Closing date: 19 Sep 2024
250 words / 7 weeks
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Presentation Presentation (10%)
Presentation
10% Week 09
Due date: 26 Sep 2024 at 16:00
10 slides
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO4 LO3
Assignment Research Essay (60%)
Research Essay
60% Week 12
Due date: 23 Oct 2024 at 16:00

Closing date: 06 Nov 2024
3000 words / 5 weeks
Outcomes assessed: LO3 LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5

Assessment summary

Crime Theory Short Essay (30%): A short essay of 1500 words (excluding references). Select one of the following criminological theories – Classical, Positivism, Chicago School, Left Realism, and Feminism. Explain the key tenets and limitations of this theory and describe its contribution to explaining crime. Due on 5 September 2024 at 4pm (Sydney, Australia time).

Research Essay Synopsis (0%): Students are to develop their own essay topic and have it approved by 12 September 2024. A synopsis of the essay topic must be submitted on Canvas no later than 12 September 2024 at 4pm (Sydney, Australia time) (earlier submission is encouraged). The synopsis must outline the proposed topic, show links to the unit content and include reference to relevant theories/theorists that will be considered in the essay. The word limit for the essay synopsis is 250 words (excluding references). The topic must resonate with the unit of study.

Presentation (10%): Students must submit no more than 10 slides (including notes of no more than 100 words per slide) outlining the key features of their proposed research essay topic. This will provide an opportunity to receive feedback on the direction being taken and the nature of the argument(s) being developed. Due on 26 September 2024 at 4pm (Sydney, Australia time).

Research Essay (60%): Theories covered in the short essay should not be covered in this essay. In addition to emailed feedback on the synopsis, the presentation will provide an opportunity to test the direction being taken and to receive feedback. The purpose of the essay is to allow students to explore, and acquire a knowledge of, an area/issue of relevance to criminology; to encourage students to think critically about that issue/area; to develop skills of criminological research, argumentation and analysis. Students will need to read widely in order to answer the question (a minimum of 20 references is a rough guide but remember its quality not quantity that matters in the end). Focus on providing a specific response to the question that draws on theoretical material and is backed up by examples. Ensure that your response is analytical and does not just summarise or describe the literature – it can’t simply be a literature review.  Attempt to compare and contrast the literature where appropriate (its strengths and its weaknesses) in order that you arrive at a reasoned response to the question. The essay is due on 23 October 2024 at 4pm (Sydney, Australia time)The word limit for the essay is 3000 words (excluding references).

Word limit penalty: A piece of assessment which exceeds the prescribed word limit will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment for every 100 words, or part thereof. The total word count for essay and other written assessments will exclude all footnotes and any bibliography (if required), and acknowledgements of permissible assistance from editors, automated writing tools or generative AI (where use is permitted).

Use of editors or proof-readers: The use of assistance in preparing and editing assessment tasks in this unit of study is strictly prohibited. Assistance includes human and automated writing tools (not including spell checking). 

Special consideration: The outcome of a grant of special consideration application may include an alternative task, at the discretion of the Unit Coordinator. 

Assessment requirements to pass a unit of study: A student must make a genuine attempt at all assessment tasks set out in this Unit of Study in order to obtain a Pass mark and grade (or above); otherwise an Absent Fail grade will be recorded as the student’s result for this Unit of Study.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2021 (Schedule 1). 

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

  • Completely answers the question.
  • Contains striking originality of approach or analysis.
  • Demonstrates exhaustive or innovative research (where independent research required).
  • Exceptionally well written, structured and expressed.
  • Is otherwise exceptional in some way.

Distinction

75 - 84

  • Completely answers the question.
  • Achieves a critical and evaluative approach to the issues.
  • Content and structure is well organised in support of the argument.
  • Demonstrates extensive research and analysis to support a well-documented argument.
  • Generally well expressed and free from errors.
  • Has a clear structure and is well articulated.

Credit

65 - 74

  • Covers main issues fairly well in answering the question.
  • Contains no significant errors.
  • Demonstrates an attempted critical approach to the issues.
  • Demonstrates reasonably sound research and analysis in addressing the key issues.
  • Has a clear structure and reasonably clear expression.

Pass

50 - 64

  • Identifies the key issues, but does not follow through with a reasoned argument.
  • Contains some significant errors.
  • Displays satisfactory engagement with the key issues.
  • Offers a descriptive summary of material relevant to the question.
  • Superficial use of material, and may display a tendency to paraphrase.
  • Demonstrates little evidence of in-depth research or analysis.
  • Adequate expression.
  • Overall, demonstrates the minimum level of competence in the assessment and satisfies the requirements to proceed to higher-level studies in the degree or subject area.

Fail

0 - 49

  • Does not answer the question.
  • Contains significant or numerous errors.
  • Few or no identifiable arguments.
  • Content that is inappropriate or irrelevant.
  • Lack of research or analysis.
  • Difficult or impossible to understand through poor grammar, expression or structure.
  • Overall, does not demonstrate the minimum level of competence in the assessment.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

The late submission of a piece of assessment, which has not been granted an extension, will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment per calendar day or part thereof. For example, a submission after 4pm but by 11:59pm on the due date for submission will attract a 10% penalty. A submission after midnight of the due date for submission will attract a 20% penalty. Canvas allows students to submit after the deadline, but all submissions after the due date and time will be recorded as late. The date and time of submission as recorded by Canvas is taken as the official and final record of a student's submission.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Support for students

The Support for Students Policy 2023 reflects the University’s commitment to supporting students in their academic journey and making the University safe for students. It is important that you read and understand this policy so that you are familiar with the range of support services available to you and understand how to engage with them.

The University uses email as its primary source of communication with students who need support under the Support for Students Policy 2023. Make sure you check your University email regularly and respond to any communications received from the University.

Learning resources and detailed information about weekly assessment and learning activities can be accessed via Canvas. It is essential that you visit your unit of study Canvas site to ensure you are up to date with all of your tasks.

If you are having difficulties completing your studies, or are feeling unsure about your progress, we are here to help. You can access the support services offered by the University at any time:

Support and Services (including health and wellbeing services, financial support and learning support)
Course planning and administration
Meet with an Academic Adviser

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction: criminology, theory and practice Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
What do we know and how can we be sure? Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 02 What do we know and how can we be sure? Pt 2 Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
The classical school (including Neo-classicism) Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 03 Biological positivism Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Mapping social space (including strain theory) Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 04 Labeling and moral panics Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Marxist influence (including state crime) Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 05 Gendering crime Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Hate crime Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 07 Cultural criminology Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Risk and governmentality Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 08 Criminal justice 1 - diversion, restorative justice and community corrections Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Criminal justice 2 - diversion, restorative justice and community corrections Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 09 Criminal justice 3 - prisons Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Prisons continued Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 11 Criminal justice policy Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Criminal justice policy continued Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 12 Revision and Review Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Revision and Review Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance: All students are required to attend 70% of classes (or as otherwise specified by the Unit Coordinator) to satisfy the pass requirements for each unit of study. Attendance requirements may be satisfied by in person attendance as specified by the Unit Coordinator. Failure to meet this requirement may result in a student being precluded from sitting the final assessment.  

Referencing: The Sydney Law School expects you to use the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (4th edition, 2018) for your footnoting style, although you should confirm this with your lecturer, and a link to the library website where this is set out comprehensively is available at https://libguides.library.usyd.edu.au/c.php?g=508212&p=3476376 

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Explain key criminological schools of thought and theories
  • LO2. Identify key sources of data on crime and criminal justice processes
  • LO3. Describe the role of key agencies and institutions of the criminal justice system
  • LO4. Describe the role of prisons and explain key features of prison administration
  • LO5. Explain the impacts of the criminal justice system on particular groups including women, children and young people, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders, culturally and linguistically diverse and LGTBQIA communities

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

No changes have been made since this unit was last offered.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.