Skip to main content
Unit outline_

LAWS6032: Crime Research and Policy

Semester 2a, 2024 [Block mode] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

This unit provides an examination of research methods in the context of criminology. The relationship between theory and methodology is explored. The production of knowledge about crime is critically assessed. Sources and forms of crime data are discussed and their significance is assessed. Research design, evaluation and analysis are also studied. This is a core unit for students enrolled in the Master of Criminology. Further information about this unit is available in the Sydney Law School timetable https://canvas.sydney.edu.au/courses/4533/pages/postgraduate-lecture-timetable, unit of study outline https://www.sydney.edu.au/units and academic staff profile https://www.sydney.edu.au/law/about/our-people/academic-staff.html

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Law
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator David Hamer, david.hamer@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Hayley Boxall, hayley.boxall@sydney.edu.au
The census date for this unit availability is 16 August 2024
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Review of research scholarship (40%)
Written task
40% Week 05
Due date: 01 Sep 2024 at 16:00

Closing date: 08 Sep 2024
3500 words / 15 working days
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Assignment Research proposal (60%)
Written task
60% Week 08
Due date: 22 Sep 2024 at 16:00

Closing date: 29 Sep 2023
4500 words / 6 weeks
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5

Assessment summary

Review of Research Scholarship (40%):  Students will write a 3500-word (excluding footnotes and bibliography) review of an article selected from a list made available via Canvas from 4.00PM on 9 August 2024 (Sydney, Australia Time). Students must select one [1] of the articles that encompass research across six primary criminology topics. This assignment aims to deepen understanding of concepts, methods, analyses, and the implications for criminology. The review task must be submitted no later than 4.00PM on 1 September 2024 (Sydney, Australia time) via Canvas. Guidelines will be provided in class discussions.

Note: The chosen topic will inform subsequent research proposal task (see below).

The Review of ​Research Scholarship asks students to demonstrate their ability to critically analyse and evaluate research in criminology (ULO1, 2) and evaluate primary and secondary sources, and articulate research methodologies in criminology (ULO 3,4), communicating these clearly and in detail to a range of audiences (ULO5). 

Special consideration: Successful grants of Special Consideration in relation to the review of research scholarship task may involve alternative tasks, as appropriate.

Research Proposal (60%): Students will develop a 4500-word (excluding footnotes and referencing) research proposal based on one of the six [6] topic areas chosen in the review of research scholarship task (above). The proposal must contain but is not limited to a detailed plan for conducting a criminological research project. The proposal must be submitted no later than 4.00PM on 22 September 2024 (Sydney, Australia time) via Canvas. Guidelines will be provided in class discussions.

Note (i): Students are expected to plan but NOT carry out the research project.

Note (ii): Students who are planning to enrol in LAWS6233/6234 Criminology Research Project A and B (12 credit points) https://canvas.sydney.edu.au/courses/4533/pages/postgraduate-coursework-research-projects are encouraged to develop a proposal that might form the basis for that project. 

The research proposal task asks students to demonstrate their ability to critically analyse the potential impact of the potential impact of research on criminology(ULO1) and communicate this effectively (ULO5). Additionally students will demonstrate their ability to engage with research methodologies and analysis of crime statistics (ULO2-4).

Special consideration: Successful grants of Special Consideration in relation to the research proposal may involve alternative tasks, as appropriate.

Word limit penalty: A piece of assessment which exceeds the prescribed word limit will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment for every 100 words, or part thereof. The total word count for essay and other written assessments will exclude all footnotes and any bibliography (if required).  

Use of editors or proof-readers: The use of assistance in preparing and editing assessment tasks in this unit of study is strictly prohibited. Assistance includes human and automated writing tools (not including spell checking). The use of Studiosity does not breach this rule but must be acknowledged.

Assessment requirements to pass a unit of study: A student must make a genuine attempt at all assessment tasks set out in this Unit of Study in order to obtain a Pass mark and grade (or above); otherwise an Absent Fail grade will be recorded as the student’s result for this Unit of Study. 

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2021 (Schedule 1). 

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

  • Completely answers the question.
  • Contains striking originality of approach or analysis.
  • Demonstrates exhaustive or innovative research (where independent research required).
  • Exceptionally well written, structured and expressed.
  • Is otherwise exceptional in some way.

Distinction

75 - 84

  • Completely answers the question.
  • Achieves a critical and evaluative approach to the issues.
  • Content and structure is well organised in support of the argument.
  • Demonstrates extensive research and analysis to support a well-documented argument.
  • Generally well expressed and free from errors.
  • Has a clear structure and is well articulated.

Credit

65 - 74

  • Covers main issues fairly well in answering the question.
  • Contains no significant errors.
  • Demonstrates an attempted critical approach to the issues.
  • Demonstrates reasonably sound research and analysis in addressing the key issues.
  • Has a clear structure and reasonably clear expression.

Pass

50 - 64

  • Identifies the key issues, but does not follow through with a reasoned argument.
  • Contains some significant errors.
  • Displays satisfactory engagement with the key issues.
  • Offers descriptive summary of material relevant to the question.
  • Superficial use of material, and may display a tendency to paraphrase.
  • Demonstrates little evidence of in-depth research or analysis.
  • Adequate expression.
  • Demonstrates the minimum level of competence and satisfies the requirements to proceed to higher-level studies.

Fail

0 - 49

  • Does not answer the question.
  • Contains significant or numerous errors.
  • Few or no identifiable arguments.
  • Content that is inappropriate or irrelevant.
  • Lack of research or analysis.
  • Difficult or impossible to understand through poor grammar, expression or structure.
  • Overall, does not demonstrate the minimum level of competence in the assessment.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

The late submission of a piece of assessment, without an approved extension, will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment per 24 hours or part thereof, after the due time on the due date. For example, a submission after 4 pm but before the same time the following day will attract a 10% penalty. Penalties for late submission will be applied strictly, subject to a 20-minute grace period.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Support for students

The Support for Students Policy 2023 reflects the University’s commitment to supporting students in their academic journey and making the University safe for students. It is important that you read and understand this policy so that you are familiar with the range of support services available to you and understand how to engage with them.

The University uses email as its primary source of communication with students who need support under the Support for Students Policy 2023. Make sure you check your University email regularly and respond to any communications received from the University.

Learning resources and detailed information about weekly assessment and learning activities can be accessed via Canvas. It is essential that you visit your unit of study Canvas site to ensure you are up to date with all of your tasks.

If you are having difficulties completing your studies, or are feeling unsure about your progress, we are here to help. You can access the support services offered by the University at any time:

Support and Services (including health and wellbeing services, financial support and learning support)
Course planning and administration
Meet with an Academic Adviser

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 02 SCANA [Student Communication and Needs Assessment]. A short online activity designed to give you insights into your academic language skills and connect you with relevant academic support to help you optimize your participation in your studies. Independent study (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
1. Introduction; 2. Unit logistics and assessment requirements; 3. Designing research; 4. Overview of research process; 5. Writing a literature review Seminar (6.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
1. Using crime, court statistics, data Part 1; 2. Using crime, court statistics, data Part 2; 3. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs 4. Review and planning for assessment Part 1 Seminar (6.5 hr) LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 04 1. Surveys, sampling and quantitative data analysis Part 1; 2. Surveys, sampling and quantitative data analysis Part 2; 3. Interviews, sampling and qualitative data analysis Part 1; 4. Interviews, sampling and qualitative data analysis Part 2 Seminar (6.5 hr) LO2 LO3 LO4
1. Field research; observations and ethnography; 2. Media and research in criminology 3. Evaluation and policy research; 4. Review and planning for assessment Part 2 Seminar (6.5 hr) LO2 LO3 LO4

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance: All students are required to attend at least 70% of classes to satisfy the pass requirements for each unit of study. Failure to meet this requirement may result in a student being precluded from undertaking the final assessment. 

For units offered in Intensive mode, participation in all scheduled sessions may be expected by a Unit Coordinator in order to satisfy the requirements of the unit. 

Referencing: The Sydney Law School expects you to use the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (4th edition, 2018) for your footnoting style, although you should confirm this with your lecturer. A link to the library website where this is set out comprehensively is available at Referencing and Citation Styles: AGLC4. 

 

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Refer to the Reading Guide that will be available on Canvas.

The textbooks for this unit are:

  • Tartaro, C. (2021). Research Methods for Criminal Justice and Criminology: A Text and Reader. Routledge. Available as e-book in library.
  • Patten, M. and Newhart, M. (2018). Understanding Research Methods: An Overview of the Essentials (10th ed).  New York: Taylor & Francis. Available as e-book in library.
  • Vogt, W.P., Vogt, E.R., Gardner, D.C. and Haeffele, L.M. (2012) When to Use What Research Design, New York: Guildford Press.  Available as e-book in library.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Critically analyse and describe to an advanced level the significance of criminological research in the development and evaluation of criminal justice policy and practice
  • LO2. Critically evaluate crime research methodology, findings, and the analysis of crime statistics.
  • LO3. Identify and evaluate the sources and forms of crime data while applying ethical approaches and theory, and acknowledging issues in criminological research
  • LO4. Synthesise primary and secondary sources such as crime statistics, articulate research methodologies in criminology and evaluate relevant methods for data collection such as surveys, interviews, observations, and quasi-experiments.
  • LO5. Communicate complex research approaches in criminology clearly and in detail to a range of diverse audiences.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Not available

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.