Skip to main content
Unit outline_

LAWS6243: International Law I

Semester 2, 2022 [Normal evening] - Remote

This unit provides an introduction to public international law. Its purpose is to ensure that students have a thorough understanding of the core principles and problems of, and contemporary issues in, international law. The unit covers the following topics: nature and scope of public international law, sources of public international law, international legal personality, the law of treaties, how title to territory is acquired, state jurisdiction in international law, immunity from jurisdiction, state responsibility for international wrongs, dispute settlement, and the legality of the use of force.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Law
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
LAWS1023 or LAWS5005
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Alison Pert, alison.pert@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Alison Pert, alison.pert@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Final exam (Take-home short release) Type D final exam Final exam (50%)
Take-home exam of 3 hours (plus 30 minutes reading). Maximum 3000 words.
50% Formal exam period 3 hours
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO4 LO2
Presentation Oral interview (non-graded)
At the lecturer's discretion, interview to discuss submitted work
0% Ongoing 30 minutes
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO4 LO3 LO2
Assignment Research essay outline (non-graded)
Rough outline of research essay
0% Week 08
Due date: 26 Sep 2022 at 16:00
Submit drafts at 1500wd and 3000wd
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO4 LO3
Assignment Research essay (50%)
Research essay
50% Week 10
Due date: 10 Oct 2022 at 16:00

Closing date: 14 Nov 2022
5000 words / 76 days
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO4 LO3
Type D final exam = Type D final exam ?

Assessment summary

  1. Research essay (50%): A 5000-word research essay which is designed to allow for a detailed and critical analysis of the chosen topic.  The assessment task will further the objectives of the unit by developing a student’s ability to conduct research in an area of international law and develop a coherent argument or set of arguments that are written clearly and persuasively in a balanced and scholarly manner. A choice of topics will be released to students on Canvas prior to or on 2 August 2022 and the assessment is due on 10 October 2022 at 16:00 (Sydney, Australia time). Students who receive a grant of Special Consideration may receive an extension or alternative task at the discretion of the Unit Coordinator.
  2. Research essay outline (non-graded): A non-assessable, rough outline of the essay must be submitted by 26 September on the Canvas site; also, drafts of the essay must be submitted once you reach around 1500 words and again at around 3000 words. If one or more of the outline, drafts or final essay are written in another language and translated into English before submission, you must also submit the version of each document in the original language. The essay will not be marked if these requirements are not satisfied. 
  3. Final exam (Take-home short release) (50%): Compulsory 3 hour take-home examination during the examination period. Maximum 3000 words length. The examination will comprise one or more problem questions. Students should retain pre-submission drafts on file. The outcome of a successful Special Consideration application is a replacement examination. The outcome of a successful Special Consideration application for a replacement examination is a second replacement examination or a viva voce, at the discretion of the Unit Coordinator.
  4. Oral interview: At the discretion of the Unit Coordinator, this will be an individual interview to discuss the content of the written work.

Assessment requirement to pass a unit of study

A student must make a genuine attempt at all assessment tasks set out in this Unit of Study in order to obtain a Pass mark and grade (or above); otherwise an Absent Fail grade will be recorded as the student’s result for this Unit of Study. 

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

  • Completely answers the question.
  • Contains striking originality of approach or analysis.
  • Demonstrates exhaustive or innovative research (where independent research required).
  • Exceptionally well written, structured and expressed.
  • Is otherwise exceptional in some way.

Distinction

75 - 84

  • Completely answers the question.
  • Achieves a critical and evaluative approach to the issues.
  • Content and structure is well organised in support of the argument.
  • Demonstrates extensive research and analysis to support a well-documented argument.
  • Generally well expressed and free from errors.
  • Has a clear structure and is well articulated.

Credit

65 - 74

  • Covers main issues fairly well in answering the question.
  • Contains no significant errors.
  • Demonstrates an attempted critical approach to the issues.
  • Demonstrates reasonably sound research and analysis in addressing the key issues.
  • Has a clear structure and reasonably clear expression.

Pass

50 - 64

  • Identifies the key issues, but does not follow through with a reasoned argument.
  • Contains some significant errors.
  • Displays satisfactory engagement with the key issues.
  • Offers descriptive summary of material relevant to the question.
  • Superficial use of material, and may display a tendency to paraphrase.
  • Demonstrates little evidence of in-depth research or analysis.
  • Adequate expression.
  • Demonstrates the minimum level of competence and satisfies the requirements to proceed to higher-level studies.

Fail

0 - 49

  • Does not answer the question.
  • Contains significant or numerous errors.
  • Few or no identifiable arguments.
  • Content that is inappropriate or irrelevant.
  • Lack of research or analysis.
  • Difficult or impossible to understand through poor grammar, expression or structure.
  • Overall, does not demonstrate the minimum level of competence in the assessment.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

The late submission of a piece of assessment, without an approved extension, will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment per 24 hours or part thereof, after the due time on the due date. For example, a submission after 4pm on the due date but before the same time the following day will attract a 10% penalty. Late penalties do not apply to exams and tests and any late submission will not be accepted.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Development, nature and scope of international law Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 02 1. Introduction to the United Nations; 2. Sources of international law Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 03 Relationship between international law and domestic law Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 04 Personality, statehood, recognition Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 05 Title to territory Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 06 Law of treaties Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 07 State jurisdiction Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 08 Immunity from jurisdiction 1 Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 09 Immunity from jurisdiction 2 Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 10 State responsibility Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 11 Diplomatic protection Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 12 Use of force Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Week 13 Settlement of disputes Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance: All students are required to attend 70% of classes to satisfy the pass requirements for each unit of study. If the class is online, all students must have their camera on at all times. Failure to meet these requirements may result in a student being precluded from sitting the final assessment. 

Word count penalty: A piece of assessment which exceeds the prescribed word limit will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment for every 100 words, or part thereof. The total word count for essays and other written assessments will:

  • excludes bibliography, cover page and footnotes (provided they are generally non-discursive) 
  • includes everything else – body text, headings and sub-headings, quotations and discursive footnotes.

Referencing: Please use the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (4th edition, 2018) for your footnoting style – https://libguides.library.usyd.edu.au/c.php?g=508212&p=347637. You must cite authority for your assertions and arguments.
 

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Please refer to the Reading List in Canvas.  The prescribed textbook is:

  • James Crawford, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (OUP, 9th ed, 2019)        
    • this is available online through the University Library

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. demonstrate legal analysis and reasoning, and the capacity to engage in a critical analysis of the topics covered in the course
  • LO2. analyse complex fact situations involving issues of public international law, to identify those issues, and to apply relevant legal principles to the problem
  • LO3. undertake postgraduate-level legal research on issues of public international law, to distinguish between appropriate and inappropriate sources and authorities, and to use those sources and authorities without violating the rules on academic integrity
  • LO4. write in a clear and logical manner, using plain and concise language and appropriate referencing, on issues of public international law.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Changes to assessments and readings have been made since this unit was last offered.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.