Skip to main content
Unit outline_

LAWS6252: Legal Reasoning and the Common Law System

Semester 1a, 2022 [Block mode] - Remote

This is a compulsory unit for all postgraduate students who do not hold a law degree or equivalent from a common law jurisdiction entering the: Master of Administrative Law and Policy; Master of Business Law; Master of Environmental Law; Master of Environmental Science and Law; Master of Health Law; Master of Labour Law and Relations as well as Graduate Diplomas offered in these programs. The unit has been designed to equip students with the necessary legal skills and legal knowledge to competently apply themselves in their chosen area of law. Instruction will cover the legislative process; the judiciary and specialist tribunals; precedent; court hierarchies; legal reasoning; constitutional law; administrative law; contracts; and torts. Some elements of the unit will be tailored in accordance with the requirements of the particular specialist programs.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Law
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
LAWS6881
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Amelia Simpson, amelia.simpson@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
In-semester test (Take-home extended release) Type E in-semester exam In-semester test
10 short-response answers in 1200 words
20% Week 02
Due date: 26 Feb 2022 at 09:00
48 hours
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO9
Assignment Short Essay
Written task
20% Week 05
Due date: 21 Mar 2022 at 12:00

Closing date: 21 Apr 2022
1200 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Assignment Case Note and Problem Question
Written task
60% Week 08
Due date: 11 Apr 2022 at 16:00

Closing date: 11 May 2022
3600 words
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO6 LO7 LO8
Type E in-semester exam = Type E in-semester exam ?

Assessment summary

In-semester test (20%) – This is comprised of 10 questions requiring short-response answers. Students must answer all questions. The total word limit is 1200 words.The duration of the in-semester test will be 48 hours, although the test itself should take no longer than three hours to complete. Questions will be released on Canvas at 9am on 26 February, 2022,  and answers are due at 9am on 28 February, 2022. The outcome of a successful Special Consideration application will be a replacement test.

Short essay (20%) - Students must answer only one question from a list of questions that will be made available on Canvas at 9am on the final day of teaching (25 February, 2022). The essay has a 1200 word limit, and is due at 12 noon on 21 March, 2022. The outcome of a successful Special Consideration application submitted before the closing date will be an extension. The outcome of a successful Special Consideration application submitted after the closing date will be an alternative assessment.

Case note and problem question (60%) - This assignment consists of two parts, a case note and a problem question, and has a combined word limit of 3600 words. The word count and relative weighting will be further broken down into the following: 2100 words (35%) for the case note and 1500 words (25%) for the problem question. The questions will be released on Canvas at 9am on the final day of teaching (25 February, 2022). The case note and problem question are due at 4pm on 11 April, 2022.The outcome of a successful Special Consideration application submitted before the closing date will be an extension. The outcome of a successful Special Consideration application submitted after the closing date will be an alternative assessment.

 

Assessment requirement to pass a unit of study

A student must make a genuine attempt at all assessment tasks set out in this Unit of Study in order to obtain a Pass mark and grade (or above); otherwise an Absent Fail grade will be recorded as the student’s result for this Unit of Study.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

Work at this level will generally:

- answer the question completely;

- contain striking originality of approach or analysis;

- demonstrate exhaustive or innovative research (where research is required);

- be exceptionally well written, structured and expressed’

- be exceptional in some other way.

Distinction

75 - 84

Work at this level will generally:

- answer the question completely;

- achieve a critical and evaluative approach to the issues;

- be well structured and articulated, including in a way that supports any conclusions;

- demonstrate strong research (where research is required) and analysis;

- be well-documented, well expressed and free from errors.

Credit

65 - 74

Work at this level will generally:

- answer the question by covering the main issues fairly well;

- contain no significant errors;

- attempt a critical approach to the issues;

- demonstrate sound research (where research is required) and analysis;

- have a clear structure and reasonably clear expression.

Pass

50 - 64

Work at this level will generally:

- identify the key issues and try to engage with them to answer the question;

- contain some significant errors;

- offer a descriptive summary of relevant material;

- use relevant material superficially, including by paraphrasing it without understanding it;

- demonstrate limited research or analsysis;

- be adequately expressed.

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

There are many ways to do this, but a common one is not answering the question but instead another question that you prefer.

Work at this level may also:

- contain significant or numerous errors;

- contain few or no identifiable arguments;

- contain inappropriate or irrelevant content;

- demonstrate a lack of research or analysis;

- be difficult or impossible to understand because of poor expression, grammar or structure.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

The late submission of a piece of assessment, which has not been granted an extension, will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment per calendar day or part thereof.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 1. What are laws? 2. Origins and fundamental principles; 3. Classification of laws. Seminar (3.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
4. Courts and precedent; 5. Common law reasoning. Seminar (3.5 hr) LO1 LO3 LO7
6. Case analysis workshop Workshop (3.5 hr) LO8
7. Legislation; 8. Statutory interpretation. Seminar (3.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO7 LO9
9. Statutory interpretation workshop Workshop (3.5 hr) LO1 LO3 LO5 LO9
10. Legal research and library skills Workshop (3.5 hr) LO3 LO5 LO7
11. Legal writing; 12. Academic honesty. Seminar (3.5 hr) LO6
13. Sub-disciplines of law: constitutional; administrative; criminal; private; international. Seminar (3.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance: All students are required to attend 70% of classes (or as otherwise specified by the Unit Coordinator) to satisfy the pass requirements for each unit of study. Attendance requirements should be satisfied by in-person attendance as specified by the Unit Coordinator. Failure to meet this requirement may result in a student being precluded from sitting the final assessment.

For units offered in Intensive mode, participation in all scheduled sessions may be expected by a Unit Coordinator in order to satisfy the requirements of the unit.

Word Count Penalty: A piece of assessment which exceeds the prescribed word limit will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment for every 100 words, or part thereof. The total word count for essay and other written assessments will exclude bibliography; footnote numbers; footnote citation; cover page and include body text; headings and sub-headings; quotations; anything other than numbers and citations in footnotes.

Referencing: The Sydney Law School expects you to use the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (4th edition, 2018) for your footnoting style, although you should confirm this with your lecturer, and a link to the library website where this is set out comprehensively is available at https://libguides.library.usyd.edu.au/c.php?g=508212&p=3476376

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

All readings for this unit can be accessed through the Library Reading List tab, available on Canvas.

 

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. demonstrate the ability to identify the distinct sources of Australian law, the institutions responsible for making them and the general nature of the processes by which they are made;
  • LO2. demonstrate understanding of the relationships between different sources of Australian law, and understand the explanations for those hierarchies;
  • LO3. demonstrate understanding of which institutions of government are responsible for enforcing which Australian laws and adjudicating disputes under them;
  • LO4. demonstrate understanding of key principles that underpin the Australian legal system, such as the rule of law, separation of judicial power and Westminster government, and understand how the origins of these principles continue to influence their operation;
  • LO5. demonstrate awareness of the differences between public, criminal and private law, and be aware of key concepts and processes in several areas of law, including constitutional, administrative, criminal, torts, contract and international law;
  • LO6. demonstrate understanding of conventions and expectations of legal analysis and writing - such as clarity, precision, relevance and brevity - as well as methods of citation/attribution of legal/other sources;
  • LO7. demonstrate understanding of the doctrine of precedent and how it applies to Australian courts;
  • LO8. demonstrate that you can analyse a court judgment to identify the legal principle(s) for which it stands (ration(es) decidendi) and the reasoning that led to it;
  • LO9. demonstrate understanding of the processes by which courts interpret legislation, including use of definitions, processes to resolve ambiguity by resort to legislative purpose and resolution of inconsistency with other statutes.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Unit has been changed substantially to allow for greater hands-on practice of skills by students. In-semester test recast as a formative assessment item, and remaining two assessment items have been re-ordered.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.