Skip to main content
Unit outline_

MCGY5600: Critical Discourses in Music

Semester 2, 2024 [Normal day] - Sydney

This unit explores some of the most important theories on music and culture that have shaped academic writing on music today. It will introduce students to scholarly debates and critical thinking potentially relevant to their own research. It will address issues such as how (knowledge of) history impacts on our musical practices, why performance has recently become a core concern of musicology, and what ideologies have shaped basic concepts such as the musical work, the canon and music analysis. Other areas covered include historiography, topics and semiotics, narrative theory, gender and sexuality, identity, genre theory and hermeneutics.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Analysis, History and Cultural Studies
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator David Larkin, david.larkin@sydney.edu.au
The census date for this unit availability is 2 September 2024
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Research essay - final
Essay
24% Formal exam period
Due date: 17 Nov 2024 at 23:59
2,500-3,000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Small continuous assessment Reading summary 1 - 8
Short written tasks over 13 weeks
40% Multiple weeks 300 words each
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO6 LO4 LO3 LO2
Small continuous assessment Critical evaluation 1 & 2
2 x contextualisations of readings from the unit of study
20% Multiple weeks 800 words each
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO4 LO3 LO2
Assignment Research essay - plan
Proposal for essay
4% Week 09
Due date: 29 Sep 2024 at 23:59
300 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
Assignment Research essay - draft
Essay
12% Week 13
Due date: 03 Nov 2024 at 23:59
2,000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2

Assessment summary

  • Reading summaries: You are required to select a reading from eight of the twelve seminars and provide a brief précis of some of the principal argument(s); you are not required to provide contextual reflections or rebuttals. You should bring a draft of of your summary along to the relevant seminar (and you may be called upon to read it), but can alter it before the official submission.
  • Critical evaluations: On two weeks of your choosing, you will provide a critical evaluation of two or more of the weekly assigned texts. While brief summaries of relevant points from the assigned texts might be appropriate, the main aim of this assessment is to encourage broader contextualisation and the evaluation of the arguments presented across a group of readings. You may offer an alternative perspective on the relevant issues, and should refer to other texts in support of this. Students are permitted to do a reading summary and a critical evaluation on the same topic, but there must not be any overlap in the material used for any two of these assessment items.
  • Research essay: Students will write an essay of 2,500-3,000 words relating in some fashion to the issues covered in this unit of study. It might involve the application of one of the theoretical approaches studied to the student’s own thesis topic or other topic chosen by the student. It should show evidence of broader reading than that required for the weekly seminars, and the ability to pursue an independent line of enquiry.

Assessment criteria

  • All written assignments for this unit will be marked according to the SCM Academic grade descriptors, as listed below. Originality is not expected in the case of the Reading Summaries.

Fail: (Below 50%) Work not of acceptable standard

Work may fail for any or all of the following reasons: Unacceptable paraphrasing; irrelevance of content; poor spelling; poor presentation; grammar or structure so sloppy it cannot be understood; failure to demonstrate understanding of content; insufficient or overlong word length.

Pass: (50%-64%) Work of acceptable standard

Written work meets basic requirements in terms of reading/research; relevant material; tendency to descriptive summary rather than critical argument; makes a reasonable attempt to avoid paraphrasing; reasonably coherent structure; often has weaknesses in particular areas, especially in terms of narrow or underdeveloped treatment of question; acceptable documentation.

Credit: (65%-74%) Highly competent work demonstrating potential for higher study

Evidence of broader understanding than pass level; offers synthesis with some critical evaluation of material; coherent argument using a range of relevant evidence; some evidence of independent thought, good referencing. A high credit (70-74) shows some evidence of ability to problematise and think conceptually.

Distinction: (75%-84%) Work of superior standard

Demonstrates initiative in research and wide, appropriate reading; complex understanding of question and ability to critically review material in relation to underlying assumptions and values; analyses material in relation to empirical and theoretical contexts; properly documented; clear, well-developed structure and argument with some signs of literary style.

High Distinction: (85%-100%) Work of exceptional standard

Demonstrates high level of initiative in research and reading; sophisticated critical analysis of evidence; high level engagement with theoretical issues, innovative use of reading/research material and impressive command of underlying debates and assumptions; properly documented and written with style, originality and precision.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Support for students

The Support for Students Policy 2023 reflects the University’s commitment to supporting students in their academic journey and making the University safe for students. It is important that you read and understand this policy so that you are familiar with the range of support services available to you and understand how to engage with them.

The University uses email as its primary source of communication with students who need support under the Support for Students Policy 2023. Make sure you check your University email regularly and respond to any communications received from the University.

Learning resources and detailed information about weekly assessment and learning activities can be accessed via Canvas. It is essential that you visit your unit of study Canvas site to ensure you are up to date with all of your tasks.

If you are having difficulties completing your studies, or are feeling unsure about your progress, we are here to help. You can access the support services offered by the University at any time:

Support and Services (including health and wellbeing services, financial support and learning support)
Course planning and administration
Meet with an Academic Adviser

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Contemporary currents in musicology Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO6
Week 02 Intertextuality and semiotics Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO6
Week 03 Historiography Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO6
Week 04 Postcolonialism and race Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO6
Week 05 Analysing analysis Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO6
Week 06 Gender and ability Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO6
Week 07 Perspectives on performance Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO6
Week 08 Music and place Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO6
Week 09 Musical kinds: works, genres, canons Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO6
Week 11 Modernism and modernity Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO6
Week 12 Absolute music and aesthetic judgment Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO6
Week 13 Brows: High, Middle, Low Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO6

Attendance and class requirements

Since participation in the seminar discussions is the core learning activity in this Unit, it is absolutely crucial that those enrolled attend all sessions, except with the explicit permission of the Unit Coordinator.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Readings for this unit of study can be accessed via Canvas

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. show your awareness of important debates in current musical scholarship
  • LO2. relate music research to wider trends and debates in the humanities and social sciences
  • LO3. understand how music can be seen as a response to and as an agent of social and cultural change
  • LO4. summarise an author’s position on a topic, and then contextualise and critique it
  • LO5. pursue your own research with a solid grounding in the norms and practices of musicological enquiry
  • LO6. engage respectfully but critically with the views of others through discussion with your peers

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Some topics have been changed, and the assessments have been tweaked compared with the 2022 offering.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.