Skip to main content
Unit outline_

MECO6905: Dissertation Part 2

Semester 2, 2022 [Supervision] - Remote

This unit requires completion of a dissertation of 12000 words, begun in the previous semester. Together with MECO6904, the unit allows students to conduct their own research projects under the supervision of a member of staff.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Media and Communications
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
MECO6904
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
MECO6928 or MECO6932 or MECO6935 or MECO6947
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Benedetta Brevini, benedetta.brevini@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Dissertation
n/a
100% Week 12
Due date: 30 Oct 2022 at 23:59
12000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2

Assessment summary

Key Elements of a Dissertation
KEY ELEMENTS OF A DISSERTATION – RECOMMENDATIONS FOR STRUCTURE (ADAPTED FROM HONOURS DOCUMENT)
Introduction
An introduction should introduce the reader to the area of interest that is to follow. For
example, a thesis that is looking at changes in the field of video games may begin with a paragraph that summarises a recent debate
as a way of introducing the topic. A summary such as this should then be linked more specifically to the aspect of video games that the
thesis and the proposal will then go on to explore in more depth.
Importantly, what follows should map out the area of the study. This mapping exercise sets parameters for the research, puts forward
questions of interest and problems and issues that the thesis intends to explore. The introduction should be written as a set of
‘openings’ rather than conclusions.
It is necessary to consider where the research sits or fits within the field of digital media and digital culture more generally. This will
orient both yourself, and, more importantly your reader, towards the relevance of the topic and its contribution to the field. So, for
example, a thesis on Social Networking Sites may note in the Introduction that while network theory has been extensively utilised in this
domain, work remains to be completed that looks at the relationship between online social networks and the motivations of individuals
within that network.
By the time you have finished your Introduction, you should be in a position to suggest that you are addressing a gap in knowledge that
will lead you into the next sub-heading.
Significance and Research Question
Explaining the significance of the research is a necessary continuation of the Introduction. Here you should explain in more detail the
gap you have identified in the Introduction.
An increasingly important part of undertaking research is ensuring that the aims of your project are clear and achievable. Your aims will
inevitably help construct the research question that is to follow.
Stating your aims involves setting out what it is that your research is trying to achieve. Some examples might include:
To contribute to a field of knowledge
To provide new statistical information (i.e. about digital media usage)
To provide a critique of a theoretical frame
To apply a new interdisciplinary approach to an existing problem
To bring together theory and practice to uncover a new angle of a particular problem
From your aims, you should be able to state the research question(s) or problem that will guide what follows in the proposal and,
ultimately, your thesis dissertation. Please be aware that your research question will usually change in some way throughout the
process and that this is a normal pathway for research. Nevertheless, it is important to try and guide the initial stages of your research
and this is where the development of a question will assist. Questions that you may need to ask yourself in developing your research
questions may include:
What particular medium am I interested in?
What issue do I want to explore?
What debates do I want to challenge?
What time frame is necessary for my exploration?
What texts (if any) are to be analysed?
What location (local, state, etc) is being explored by my research?
What institutions are relevant to my research (social, cultural, political, etc)?
Methodology
There are many possible methodologies that you may choose to utilise in your thesis, for example:
Working with Numbers (quantitative): surveys, content analysis (counting and categorising digital media texts)
Working with People (qualitative): reception analysis and network analysis, involving
interviewing, observing and focus groups
• Working with Texts: textual analysis, discourse, framing and content analysis using a
variety of approaches
When thinking about the appropriate methodology for your research you should seek to uncover what other researchers with similar
interests have employed. Alternatively, this is a matter that can also be discussed with your supervisor.
This section of the thesis should state what method(s) you have chosen and why, making reference to previous work and/or the
boundaries of your investigation. In instances where the main method is textual analysis, students are expected to list what they
consider to be the relevant texts for their research as well as provide an accompanying explanation.
Chapter Outline/Argument
While the structure of your thesis is likely to undergo several changes, it is important at this stage to map out how you want to present
your argument. While the number of chapters will vary, each thesis must include an Introduction and a Conclusion. There are many
variables that may affect how you decide to structure your work and again, this is something that your supervisor may wish to discuss
with you in the early stages of your research.
A chapter outline aims to demonstrate how your research question will be answered. It shows how your thesis will tell a particular
narrative. So, for example, you may wish to use the first chapter as an extended literature review that also points to work that will be
taken up in proceeding chapters. Your second and third chapters may be analysis of data collected (textual, ethnographic, etc.) that
alludes to the literature in the first chapter and begins to build the greater argument. The final chapter may then explore the greater
argument in more detail, either using a penultimate piece of data or work that has been outlined in the previous chapters.
Each researcher has their own style – for you it is important to explore what style suits you and your purposes. You must remember
however, that each chapter works to address your question and therefore contributes to the overall argument.
Bibliography
Your thesis should include an extended bibliography, not only of texts that you have specifically cited, but also those that have informed
your research.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a High distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a Distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

 

Distinction

75 - 84

 

Credit

65 - 74

 

Pass

50 - 64

 

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

n/a

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes

Attendance and class requirements

  • Attendance: According to Faculty Board Resolutions, students in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences are expected to attend 90% of their classes. If you attend less than 50% of classes, regardless of the reasons, you may be referred to the Examiner’s Board. The Examiner’s Board will decide whether you should pass or fail the unit of study if your attendance falls below this threshold.
  • Lecture recording: Most lectures (in recording-equipped venues) will be recorded and may be made available to students on the LMS. However, you should not rely on lecture recording to substitute your classroom learning experience.
  • Preparation: Students should commit to spend approximately three hours’ preparation time (reading, studying, homework, essays, etc.) for every hour of scheduled instruction.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. conduct a supervised program of research in an area of study relevant to their degree
  • LO2. research and produce a 12000 word dissertation thesis.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

we are constantly considering feedback from students

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.