Skip to main content
Unit outline_

MECO6945: Creative Non-Fiction Workshop

Semester 1, 2020 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

This unit of study introduces students to the principles and practices of creative non-fiction, also known as literary journalism. This broad genre includes travel, memoir, biography, essays, true crime, historical, medical or investigative narratives. The unit provides a scholarly framework to creative nonfiction and the work of writers such as essayists and literary journalists. In addition to the content provided by the coordinators, and in-class writing exercises, three major contemporary nonfiction writers take participants through the process of composition of their recent works.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Media and Communications
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
ENGL6984
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Cheryl O'Byrne, cheryl.obyrne@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Creative nonfiction story
Creative nonfiction story on a topic of your choice
50% Formal exam period
Due date: 09 Jun 2020 at 23:59

Closing date: 19 Jun 2020
2000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO6 LO7 LO8
Assignment Exegesis
Critical reflection on your story
30% Formal exam period
Due date: 15 Jun 2020 at 23:59

Closing date: 25 Jun 2020
1000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO9
Assignment Online submission
Contribution to online discussion forums
20% Multiple weeks 3 x 500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO4 LO10

Assessment summary

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a High distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a Distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

High distinction projects demonstrate outstanding levels of creativity, storytelling, technical competency and publishing ability. These productions have a sophisticated approach towards creativity and storytelling by understanding their audience and drawing on outstanding engagement techniques. The technical capacity demonstrates outstanding skills by correctly recording, capturing, manipulating and exporting the production that adheres to industry standards. The work exceeds the requirements of this assignment and could be commissioned by existing media publications. 

Distinction

75 - 84

Distinction projects demonstrate excellent levels of creativity, storytelling, technical competency and publishing ability. These productions have a sophisticated approach towards creativity and storytelling by understanding their audience and drawing on excellent engagement techniques. The technical capacity demonstrates excellent skills by correctly recording, capturing, manipulating and exporting the production that adheres to industry standards. The work exceeds the requirements of this assignment. 

Credit

65 - 74

Credit projects demonstrate good levels of creativity, storytelling, technical competency and publishing ability. These productions have a well-rounded approach towards creativity and storytelling by understanding their audience and drawing on satisfactory engagement techniques. The technical capacity demonstrates good skills by correctly recording, capturing, and manipulating the production, which may have a few minor problems. The work demonstrates the requirements of this assignment. 

Pass

50 - 64

Projects that pass demonstrate minimal levels of creativity, storytelling, technical competency and publishing ability. These productions have some understanding of creativity and storytelling but have been masked by errors and problems in comprehensive produciton. The technical capacity demonstrates some skills by correctly recording, capturing and manipulating the media, but also demonstrates some technical problems and errors. The work minimally meets the requirements of this assignment.

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

 

.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 What is creative nonfiction? Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 02 Introduction to creative nonfiction ethics Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 03 Mark Tredinnick on the lyric essay, part one Seminar (3 hr)  
Week 04 Mark Tredinnick on the lyric essay, part two Seminar (3 hr)  
Week 05 Mark Tredinnick on the lyric essay, part three Seminar (3 hr)  
Week 06 Fiona Wright on the personal essay, part one Seminar (3 hr)  
Week 07 Fiona Wright on the personal essay, part two Seminar (3 hr)  
Week 08 Fiona Wright on the personal essay, part three Seminar (3 hr)  
Week 09 Writing your exegesis Seminar (2 hr)  
Week 10 Linda Jaivin on literary journalism, part one Seminar (3 hr)  
Week 11 Linda Jaivin on literary journalism, part two Seminar (3 hr)  
Week 12 Linda Jaivin on literary journalism, part three Seminar (3 hr)  
Week 13 The art of revision and a final workshop Seminar (2 hr)  

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance: According to the Faculty Board Resolutions, students in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences are expected to attend 90% of their classes. See  https://sydney.edu.au/handbooks/arts_PG/rules/faculty_resolutions.shtml

 

 

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Tredinnick, Mark. (2009). The blue plateau: A landscape memoir. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.  

Wright, Fiona. (2018). The world was whole. Artarmon: Giramondo.  

 

All other readings for this unit can be accessed via the eReserve link on our Canvas site. 

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Demonstrate a sound understanding of the genre of creative nonfiction, also known as literary or narrative journalism
  • LO2. Illustrate familiarity with major works of practitioners in Australia and internationally
  • LO3. Acquire a broad historical overview of the genre in Australia and internationally
  • LO4. Exercise critical judgement and analysis in relation to these works
  • LO5. Demonstrate competencies in reporting and research as well as narrative techniques, including an understanding of writing for screen or page
  • LO6. Demonstrate the ability to make creative use of language while respecting and adhering to the factual basis of the material, and paying attention to the ethical implications of the research process
  • LO7. Demonstrate an understanding of and sensitivity to the grey area between fact and fiction when using narrative techniques to relate factual events
  • LO8. Demonstrate an awareness and understanding of audience in the writing and an ability to target material to appropriate publishing markets or communities of readers
  • LO9. Understand the ethical implications of reporting and research for creative nonfiction writing
  • LO10. Confidently engage in sophisticated critical discussions with authors and other students regarding the processes of writing creative nonfiction and offer constructive editorial feedback during peer review

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

This is the first time this unit has been offered in MECO. It was previously run by the English department. The increase from 2 to 3 hours of class time on guest lecture days is in response to student feedback from the English-run unit.

More information can be found on Canvas. 

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.