Skip to main content
Unit outline_

OCCP3201: Community Development and Disability

Semester 1, 2023 [Normal day] - Remote

People with and without disability can take collective action to help build liveable, sustainable, and equitable communities. In these healthy communities, people with disability feel comfortable being who they are, they participate in decisions that affect their lives, they have the same sense of life-opportunity as other people, and they know they will be treated fairly and with respect. Disability inclusive community development challenges discrimination and exclusion whilst promoting recognition of people with disability as fully contributing and responsible citizens. The unit will apply the tools of community development to real-world problems as the vehicle for significant multidisciplinary learning about disability-inclusive and sustainable community development. We will identify common narratives that perpetuate inequity for people with disability and appraise how these narratives inform contemporary policies, programs, and services. We will consider why these dialogues endure even when evidence shows they have adverse effects. We will explore how modes of working with communities, such as community capacity development, policy, and advocacy, are used to (re)shape opportunities for inclusive and sustainable communities.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Participation Sciences
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
Students will need to have completed 18 credit points of 2000 level units
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Michelle Villeneuve, michelle.villeneuve@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment group assignment Assessment 3: Community Capacity Development Approach
Share an approach to community development in an engaging way
20% Multiple weeks In-Class interactive workshop
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Assignment group assignment Assessment 2: Annotated Bibliography
Annotated bibliography outlining further reading for peers and instructors
15% Multiple weeks 1000 - 1500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO3 LO5
Assignment Assessment 1: Case Study Report
Describe a community development program from interview with practitioner.
25% Week 07
Due date: 07 Apr 2023 at 21:54
1000 – 1500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2
Assignment Assessment 4: Written report
Design a disability-inclusive community development pitch
40% Week 13
Due date: 26 May 2023 at 22:14
2500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO1
group assignment = group assignment ?

Assessment summary

Assessment 1: Case Study

Produce an original case study that provides a descriptive overview of a community development project/program – individually, students will choose an individual/ organisation to interview about their community development program/actions and complete the case study using an adapted International Association of Community Development (IACD) template.

The IACD template (adapted version) will be made available in Canvas. Interviews can be supported by documentary review of program materials, websites, videos etc.

A case study describes a real-world instance of a phenomenon so that others can get better insight into the experience. In this assessment, the phenomenon is community development. In this assessment the case study will be used to describe the phenomenon through the voice of an individual/ organisational representative who engaged in the community development practice. It can include information gathered through other sources (e.g., documents, videos, website, etc). Other sources can strengthen case studies because they give multiple perspective input about a phenomenon. Case studies can take many forms. For this assessment, a template is provided.

Assessment 2: Annotated Bibliography

Create an annotated bibliography to direct learning by your peers/instructors about the topic of your Community Capacity Development Workshop (seek weeks 8 – 13). This group assessment is directly related to assessment 3. So, read about Assessment 3 first.

Having learned about one approach to community development, what resources do you recommend for further learning about this approach? Create an annotated bibliography to direct further learning by your peers/instructors.

An annotated bibliography is a list of citations of key/most helpful resources. An annotated bibliography consists of (a) a title, (b) annotation (4 – 5 sentences/approx. 150 words per resource), and (c) citation (fully reference in APA format). The purpose of annotations is to provide the reader with a critical appraisal of each resource. The annotation summarises each resource in terms of how the reader will benefit from it. The citation ensures that the resource can be easily retrieved from the original source.

A good annotation informs the reader of the relevance, accuracy, and quality of the source cited.

An annotated bibliography (the collective list of resources) is submitted as a cohesive resource that can be used to develop a comprehensive understanding of the topic and support critical engagement with the topic.

Assessment 3: Community Capacity Development Workshop 

Using community development principles and approaches learned in weeks 1 – 6 engage with your peers in the topic, theory, or approach to community development (see schedule for topics). Your aim is to build capability in your peers; giving them breadth and depth of the knowledge about the approach and increasing their confidence to implement the approach in the future.

The community capacity development session will support your peers to learn about an approach to community development. You aren’t just telling about something you learned. Rather, your goal is to enable capacity development in others.

The following questions should guide the pre-planning with your capacity development team.

Content Planning Questions:

  • What is this approach to community development? Or rather, How does this approach, framework, theory, or way of thinking help us to engage more effectively in community development?
  • What disciplinary knowledge(s) inform this approach? What are its conceptual underpinnings?
  • How has this approach been employed in community development (by others)? What does it/might it look like in practice? – offer example(s)
  • How does this approach align with the International Association of Community Development (IACD) themes? (Integrate this with your example(s) and/or consider how does it differ from IACD themes?)
  • How can community development practitioners use this approach to achieve disability inclusive and sustainable community development?

Process Planning Questions:

  • What are the helpful things about this approach? Why are they helpful?
  • Are there aspects that might be challenging for practitioners (especially novice practitioners)? What are they? Discuss how to overcome them.
  • How can our group integrate current/seminal information on this topic into the session to develop capability in our peers?
  • How would we (as individuals, as a group) want to learn about this topic? Can we be creative in our approach, what interactive learning activities will help bring the topic to life?

What will we leave our peers with, so they have the key messages to take into their practice and/or share with others?

Assessment 4: Written Report

Design a great disability-inclusive community program, project, or initiative.

Format: You can choose:

  • use visual program logic to bring the project to life visually with fewer words.
  • consider pitching your idea using pre-recorded PPT slide deck
  • make a short video to pitch your idea.

Pitch the project idea using the criteria below.

Criteria:

Remember: A simple way of thinking about demonstrating community benefit is to consider: What is the problem or opportunity? How does it affect or impact the community? What difference would your idea make?

Give your project a title/name?

Briefly describe your idea.

[outline the problem/issue that this idea responds to; Clarify what is involved (what activities will take place?). Make the community development principles/tools/approach explicit]

What difference will your idea make?

[Specify how your idea will increase meaningful participation of people with disability and positively impact the whole community. Make the link between community development approach and inclusion outcomes explicit.]

Profile the community (local government area, suburb, or neighbourhood) where this initiative will be implemented.

[Explain why this community can benefit most from this initiative. Use ABS statistics and other evidence to support the community profile. Don’t forget to include people with disability in this profile.

Make the link between your idea and government policy or strategies explicit (e.g., Council Disability Inclusion Action Plan or other strategy).

Identify a community/neighbourhood centre or other community group that could host/lead this activity.

[Explain why this they are well-suited suited to lead the initiative. Identify a minimum of two potential challenges to implementing your idea and how they will be addressed]

What is the estimated cost of your idea

[Indicate the amount of money needed to achieve this idea and provide a table with a simple budget breakdown. Note: the project must cost no more than $50,000 AUD).

Provide references

[Demonstrate a well-evidenced idea by providing no less than 6 sources of information used to support its development]

Assessment criteria

Result code

Result name

Mark range

Description

HD

High distinction

85 - 100

Awarded when you demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at an exceptional standard, as defined by grade descriptors or exemplars outlined by your faculty or school.

DI

Distinction

75 - 84

Awarded when you demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at a very high standard, as defined by grade descriptors or exemplars outlined by your faculty or school.

CR

Credit

65 - 74

Awarded when you demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at a good standard, as defined by grade descriptors or exemplars outlined by your faculty or school.

PS

Pass

50 - 64

Awarded when you demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at an acceptable standard, as defined by grade descriptors or exemplars outlined by your faculty or school.

FA

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction to Unit processes, content, and foundational knowledge - Disability inclusion Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1
Week 02 Introduction to foundational knowledge - What is community? Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1
Week 03 Introduction to foundational knowledge - What is community development? Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 04 Introduction to foundational knowledge - What is sustainable development? Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO5
Week 05 Introduction to foundational knowledge - Empowerment, Dignity, and Care (ethics) Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO2 LO3
Week 06 Theory, Frameworks and Methods of Community Development - The basics: Dialogue for Development Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 07 Theory, Frameworks and Methods of Community Development - Governance Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 08 Theory, Frameworks and Methods of Community Development - Community Capacity Development Workshop 1 Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 09 PUBLIC HOLIDAY Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 10 Theory, Frameworks and Methods of Community Development - Community Capacity Development Workshop 2 Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 11 Theory, Frameworks and Methods of Community Development - Community Capacity Development Workshop 3 Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 12 Theory, Frameworks and Methods of Community Development - Community Capacity Development Workshop 4 Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 13 Theory, Frameworks and Methods of Community Development - Community Capacity Development Workshop 5 Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Readings will be assigned or recommended each week to support learning in this unit of study. These core texts have been chosen to support a holistic background understanding of disability and community development. Selected readings from these texts will be assigned or recommended weekly.

Disability: Disciplinary backgrounds selected include sociology and a philosophy primer on Disability

Shakespeare, T., (2018). Disability The Basics. Abingdon, Oxon. Routledge, 2018. https://www-taylorfrancis-com.ezproxy.library.sydney.edu.au/books/mono/10.4324/9781315624839/disability-tom-shakespeare

The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Disability edited by Adam Cureton and David T. Wasserman. Oxford UK, Oxford University Press. ToC: https://www-oxfordhandbooks-com.ezproxy.library.sydney.edu.au/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190622879.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780190622879

Community Development:

Matarrita-Cascante, D., & Brennan, M.A. (2012). Conceptualising community development in the twenty-first century. Community Development, 43,3, 293-305.

Johnson Butterfield, A. K., & Korazim-Korosy, Y. (2007).  Interdisciplinary Community Development: International Perspectives. Florence: Routledge, 2007. Co-published in Journal of Community Practice as a series of articles: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J125v15n01_01 

Issue ToC: https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/wcom20/15/1-2?nav=tocList

Phillips, E., Trevan, E., Kraeger, P. (2020). Research handbook on community development. https://doi-org.ezproxy.library.sydney.edu.au/10.4337/9781788118477.

Tesoriero, F. & Ife, J. (2010). Community Development: Community-based alternatives in an Age of Globalisation, Pearson, Australia.

Disability and Community Development

Special issue on Disability and Community Development in the Community Development Journal, A Journal of the Community Development Society, Vol 37, No. 3, Autumn 2006.

   Issue ToC: https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rcod20/37/3?nav=tocList

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Apply community development and disability theory to appraise the inclusiveness of a program and its guiding policy framework and identify areas for future development and change (towards greater inclusiveness).
  • LO2. Devise a plan to respectfully acquire social, cultural, and historical information from multiple stakeholders and information sources to learn about a community.
  • LO3. Select an effective framework and mode for working with communities matched to community goals and priorities.
  • LO4. Establish strategies to work in partnership with diverse communities, including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities.
  • LO5. Identify criteria upon which to assess the success, scalability and sustainability of a disability inclusive community development initiative.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

This is the first year that this unit is offered.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.