Skip to main content
Unit outline_

OLES2107: Digital Influence through Social Media

Semester 2, 2020 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

This unit explores social media as an increasingly important space across a broad and diverse range of industries and organisations. It will highlight developments within this communication space, while also providing a wide range of new and exciting employment contexts that include specific social media communication skills. The unit offers a unique interdisciplinary approach to provide theoretically informed and up-to-the-minute training in social media communication.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Media and Communications
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Jonathon Hutchinson, jonathon.hutchinson@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Cherryldene Baylosis, cherry.baylosis@sydney.edu.au
Agata Stepnik, agata.stepnik@sydney.edu.au
Rachael Bolton, rachael.bolton@sydney.edu.au
Jennifer Hagedorn, jennifer.hagedorn@sydney.edu.au
Katariina Rahikainen, katariina.rahikainen@sydney.edu.au
Brittany Ferdinands, brittany.ferdinands@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Weekly Online Skills Application
Weekly task
20% Ongoing 10 submissions
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO3 LO2
Assignment Analysis of a Social Media Campaign
Assignment
20% Week 05
Due date: 25 Sep 2020 at 23:59

Closing date: 09 Oct 2020
1000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2
Assignment group assignment Social media project
n/a
50% Week 12
Due date: 20 Nov 2020 at 23:59

Closing date: 27 Nov 2020
3000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Assignment Reflection on Group Work
Assignment
10% Week 12
Due date: 20 Nov 2020 at 23:59

Closing date: 27 Nov 2020
500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO3 LO5
group assignment = group assignment ?

Assessment summary

  • Analysis of a Social Media Campaign: For this assignment, students will identify an existing social media campaign and critically examine how it operates. 
  • Social media project: The social media project for this unit is designed to replicate a real world social media campaign that the ‘client’ would expect to accompany a broader communication strategy. By integrating your research from Assignment 1, you will create a social media campaign.
  • Weekly Online Skills Application: Students are required to create a small creative component that builds on the week’s themes and corresponds with the broader requirements for Assignment 2, the Social Media Group Project. 
  • Reflection on Group Work: For this assignment, students are required to reflect on their experiences of working as a group within their production team. 

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a High distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a Distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

High distinction assessments demonstrate outstanding levels of thematic alignment, creativity, technical competency and student ability. These assessments have a sophisticated approach towards theoretical comprehension, alongside a creativly expressed execution of the task. High distinction assessments have few blemishes and represent an outstanding capacity to integrate the resources from the unit for the required task.

Distinction

75 - 84

Distinction assessments demonstrate excellent levels of thematic alignment, creativity, technical competency and student ability. These assessments have a sophisticated approach towards theoretical comprehension, alongside a creativly expressed execution of the task. Distinction assessments have few blemishes and represent an excellent capacity to integrate the resources from the unit for the required task.

Credit

65 - 74

Credit assessments demonstrate good levels of thematic alignment, creativity, technical competency and student ability. These assessments have a somewhat sophisticated approach towards theoretical comprehension, alongside a creativly expressed execution of the task. Credit assessments may have some technical issues and represent a good capacity to integrate the resources from the unit for the required task.

Pass

50 - 64

Pass assessments demonstrate some level of thematic alignment, creativity, technical competency and student ability. These assessments have attempted to approach theoretical comprehension, but may have fallen short. Pass assessments demonstrate inconsistencies with the requirements of the task, yet have attempted to integrate the resources from the unit for the required task.

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

As per the FASS Policy: (1) It is expected that, unless an application for a simple extension or special consideration has been approved, students will submit all assessment for a unit of study on the due date specified. If assessment is completed or submitted within a period of extension, no academic penalty will be applied to that piece of assessment. (2) If an extension is either not sought, not granted or is granted but work is submitted after the extended due date, the late submission of assessment will result in an academic penalty as outlined in section 7A of the Assessment Procedures 2011.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes

Attendance and class requirements

  • Attendance: According to Faculty Board Resolutions, students in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences are expected to attend 90% of their classes. If you attend less than 50% of classes, regardless of the reasons, you may be referred to the Examiner’s Board. The Examiner’s Board will decide whether you should pass or fail the unit of study if your attendance falls below this threshold.

  • Lecture recording: Most lectures (in recording-equipped venues) will be recorded and may be made available to students on the LMS. However, you should not rely on lecture recording to substitute your classroom learning experience.

  • Preparation: Students should commit to spend approximately three hours’ preparation time (reading, studying, homework, essays, etc.) for every hour of scheduled instruction.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Week 1 – Introduction to Social Media

Fuchs, C. (2014). What is Social Media? Social Media: A Critical Introduction (pp. 31 - 51). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Marwick, A. E., & boyd, d. (2010). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133.

 

Week 2 – Social Media Users

Steele, C. K. (2016). The Digital Barbershop: Blogs and Online Oral Culture Within the African American Community. Social Media + Society, October–December(2016), 1–10.

Kral, I. (2011). Youth media as cultural practice: Remote Indigenous youth speaking out loud. Australian Aboriginal Studies, 2011(1), 4–16.

 

Week 3 – Participatory Culture: Hashtags, Memes & Social Media

Bonilla, Y., & Rosa, J. (2015). #Ferguson: Digital protest, hashtag ethnography, and the racial politics of social media in the United States. American Ethnologist, 42(1), 4–17. 

Frazer, R., & Carlson, B. (2017). Indigenous Memes and the Invention of a People. Social Media + Society, October–December(2017), 1–12.

 

Week 4 – YouTube and Video Cultures of Social Media

Cabalquinto, E. C., & Soriano, C. R. R. (2020). ‘Hey, I like ur videos. Super relate!’ Locating sisterhood in a postcolonial intimate public on YouTube. Information Communication & Society, 23(6), 892–907.

Christian, A. J. (2016). Video stars: Marketing queer performance in networked television. In S. U. Noble & B. M. Tynes (Eds.), The intersection internet: Race, sex, class, and culture online (pp. 95–113). New York: Peter Lang.

 

Week 5 – Ethics in Social Media

Warfield K, Hoholuk J, Vincent B, et al. (2019) Pics, Dicks, Tits, and Tats: negotiating ethics working with images of bodies in social media research. New Media & Society Online First: 1–20.

Ananny, M. (2015). From Noxious to Public? Tracing Ethical Dynamics of Social Media Platform Conversations. Social Media + Society, April-June, 1-3.

 

Week 6 – Automation and Social Media

Matamoros-Fernández, A. (2017). Platformed racism: the mediation and circulation of an Australian race-based controversy on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube. Information Communication & Society, 20(6), 930–946.

Cotter K. (2018) Playing the visibility game: How digital influencers and algorithms negotiate influence on Instagram. New Media & Society 21: 895–913.

 

Week 7 – Data Analytics

Bruns, A., Burgess, J., Crawford, K., & Shaw, F. (2012). #qldfloods and @QPSMedia: Crisis Communication on Twitter in the 2011 South East Queensland Floods. Retrieved from Brisbane, Queensland:

McGlotten, S. (2016). Black Data. In E. P. Johnson (Ed.), No tea, no shade: New writings in black queer studies (pp. 262–286). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

 

Week 8 – Cultural Intermediation for Social Media

Hutchinson, J. (2019). Digital First Personality: Automation and influence within evolving media ecologies. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, Online First. doi:org/10.1177/1354856519858921

Duffy, B. E., & Pooley, J. (2019). Idols of Promotion: The Triumph of Self-Branding in an Age of Precarity. Journal of Communication, 69(2019), 26–48. 

 

Week 9 - Social Influencers 

Senft, T. M. (2013). Microcelebrity and the Branded Self. In J. B. John Hartley, Axel Bruns (Ed.), A Companion to New Media Dynamics (pp. 346-354). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

Abidin, C. (2016). “Aren’t These Just Young, Rich Women Doing Vain Things Online?”: Influencer Selfies as Subversive Frivolity. Social Media + Society, 2(23), 1-17.

 

Week 10 – Digital Agencies and Multichannel Networks

Cunningham, S., & Craig, D. (2017). Being ‘really real’ on YouTube: authenticity, community and brand culture in social media entertainment. Media International Australia, 164(1), 71-81.

Leaver, T., Highfield, T., & Abidin, C. (2019). Economies. In Instagram (pp. 100–148). Cambridge: Polity.

 

Week 11 – Institutional Marketing and Communications for Social Media

Alhabash, S., & Ma, M. (2017). A Tale of Four Platforms: Motivations and Uses of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat Among College Students? Social Media + Society, Online First, 1-13.

Arli, D., & Dietrich, T. (2017). Can Social Media Campaigns Backfire? Exploring Consumers' Attitudes and Word-of-Mouth Toward Four Social Media Campaigns and Its Implications on Consumer-Campaign Identification. Journal of Promotion Management, Online First, 1-17.

 

Week 12 – Following Audiences: Social Media Futures

Hutchinson, J. (2017). Algorithmic Culture and Cultural Intermediation Cultural Intermediaries: Audience participation and media organisations (pp. 201-220). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

McCabe, M. B. (2017). Social Media Marketing Strategies for Career Advancement: An analysis of LinkedIn. Journal of Business and Behavioral Sciences, 29(1), 85-99.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. demonstrate proficiency in the analysis, ideology and discourse of social media and its content strategies
  • LO2. demonstrate the basic skills in conceptual media design and production for social media
  • LO3. demonstrate a strong and interpersonal communication capacity by engaging in collegial and collaborative communication practice (group work)
  • LO4. design and produce a social media strategy
  • LO5. demonstrate a capacity to undertake project work through interdisciplinary study.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

We have significantly changed this unit since its last offering. The assessments have been aligned and weighted accordingly to assist students in the completion of their major Social Media Project, the readings have been updated to reflect the contemporary social media environment by drawing on Critical Digital Race Studies especially, and the weekly content has been updated from previous offerings. You will now also engage with your project group weekly to create social media 'things' (artefacts) that will help you with your final submissions.

Participation Hours

  • 1 hour online lecture content per week
  • 2 hours of online seminar activity each week

Students will engage in 1 hour of online lecture content each week and will also participate in an additional two hours of online activities on Canvas and other social media platforms.

Students will have to provide responses to the weekly theory surrounding social media and communication by engaging with their peers through a discussion forum or practical task. Additionally, students will be required to virtually meet with their group members for to develop their social media projects and complete weekly tasks.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.