Skip to main content
Unit outline_

PMGT2711: Critical Thinking for Projects

Semester 1, 2023 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

Critical questioning is important in all project communication and action. This unit explores ways of testing assumptions, and challenging the logical validity of arguments. The ability to critically question is a fundamental competency for effective project management, whether that be exploring the finer points of contracts, constructing an argument to win a bid or challenging project decisions.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Project Management
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Michael Buhagiar, michael.buhagiar@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Michael Buhagiar, michael.buhagiar@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Online task Participation
Assessment of contribution to unit
10% Multiple weeks Durations will vary
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO7 LO6 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
Assignment Reflective Learning Journal
Written assessment to be submitted online
20% Week 07
Due date: 16 Apr 2023 at 23:59
1200 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Assignment group assignment Team charter
Written completion of template
5% Week 08
Due date: 23 Apr 2023 at 23:59
5 pages
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3
Assignment Critical Response Essay
Written assignment to be submitted online
35% Week 10
Due date: 07 May 2023 at 23:59
1,500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Assignment group assignment Team presentation
Team presentation
30% Week 12
Due date: 21 May 2023 at 23:59
15 mins
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
group assignment = group assignment ?

Assessment summary

  • Reflective Learning Journals. These take the form of written reflections on the contents of Weeks 1-3, 4, 5 and 6, to be submitted in a single document in Week 7. Each reflection to be of 300 words, and worth 5%, 20% in total.
  • Critical Response Essay. On a topic to be provided. To be submitted online on Sunday of Week 10. Length = 1,500 words plus or minus 10%. Worth 35 % of total mark for unit.
  • Team charter: The charter is a component of the presentation assessment. It is intended to enhance team performance by ensuring that all team members develop, at an early stage, a common understanding of team communication, meetings arrangements, performance expectations, and penalties. The charter is due on the Sunday of Week 8, and is worth 5% of the total unit mark.
  • Presentation. A team assessment on a topic to be provided. To be submitted as a video file in Week 12, or presented in person in Week 12 or 13, depending on workshop delivery mode. Worth 30 % of total mark for unit.
  • Participation. Assessed on basis of contributions to workshops throughout the semester. Worth 10% of final mark.

Please see Canvas – Home – Assessment information for more details

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).
As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name Mark range Description
High Distinction 85-100  
Distinction 75-84  
Credit 65-74  
Pass 50-64  
Fail 0-49
When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard

 

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

For every calendar day up to and including ten calendar days after the due date, a penalty of 5% of the maximum awardable marks will be applied to late work. The penalty will be calculated by first marking the work, and then subtracting 5% of the maximum awardable mark for each calendar day after the due date. Example: Consider an assignment's maximum awardable mark is 10; the assignment is submitted 2 days late; and the assignment is marked as 7/10. After applying the penalty, marks will be: 7 - (0.5 x 2) = 6/10. For work submitted more than ten calendar days after the due date a mark of zero will be awarded. The marker may elect to, but is not required to, provide feedback on such work. Refer to section 7A of Assessment procedures policy available at: http://sydney.edu.au/policies/showdoc.aspx?recnum=PDOC2012/267&RendNum=0

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction to unit Workshop (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 02 Behavioural biases in PM Workshop (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 03 Journaling for project success Workshop (2 hr) LO1 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 04 Critical thinking: Facione model Workshop (2 hr) LO1 LO3 LO4 LO6
Week 05 Critical thinking: Paul and Elder model Workshop (2 hr) LO1 LO3 LO4 LO6
Week 06 Dichotomies in PM Workshop (2 hr) LO1 LO4 LO7
Week 07 Diagnosing project complexity Workshop (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO5
Week 08 Communicating in uncertain project environments Workshop (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 09 Cultural factors in project performance Workshop (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO7
Week 10 Top-down (ideological) thinking Workshop (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 11 Bottom-up (empirical) thinking Workshop (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6
Week 12 Rethinking project management Workshop (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 13 Capstone activity Workshop (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7

Attendance and class requirements

Students are expected to attend and participate in all workshops. This will count towards your Participation mark.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

All readings will be available on Canvas  

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Apply conceptual thinking to define situations and strategies
  • LO2. Promote an holistic view of the project and its context to improve decision-making
  • LO3. Critically question and challenge assumptions
  • LO4. Apply logical reasoning to construct and deconstruct arguments
  • LO5. Inform critical thinking with considerations of human and social aspects of the project
  • LO6. Select from a variety of critical thinking approaches to suit the situation
  • LO7. Employ critical thinking to leverage pluralism in a volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous environment

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

This is the fourth iteration of PMGT2711. It is based on a unit which has been taught to the Masters students for several years. One of the lessons from the Masters unit is that students may need support in undertaking the reading required, and in completing the written assignments, and the teaching staff will be mindful of that throughout semester. The team charter was a new assessment requirement for 2022, to ensure that presentation teams get off to a good start with regard to collaboration. For 2023 there are two possible modes for team presentation submission, either video file (for RE students) or in-person (for CC).

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.