Skip to main content
Unit outline_

PRFM2601: Being There: Theories of Performance

Semester 1, 2023 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

What if all the world really is a stage? In this unit, you will learn key theories and conceptual tools for analysing the broad spectrum of performance events that lie beyond what is conventionally associated with the term 'theatre'. You will conduct original research, focusing on how performance (re)constitutes identity and (re)forms a culture.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Theatre and Performance Studies
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
12 credit points at 1000 level in Theatre and Performance Studies including PRFM1601
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
PRFM2001
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Amanda Card, amanda.card@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Amanda Card, amanda.card@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Research essay
Essay
50% Formal exam period
Due date: 05 Jun 2023 at 23:59
2500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO3 LO4 LO5
Assignment Short response to set reading: Bourdieu
Short Answer
15% Week 05
Due date: 24 Mar 2023 at 23:59
600 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO4 LO3
Assignment Short response to set reading: Turner
Short Answer
15% Week 08
Due date: 17 Apr 2023 at 23:59
600 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO3 LO2
Assignment hurdle task Research proposal
Essay template
20% Week 10
Due date: 05 May 2023 at 23:59
800 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO5 LO4 LO3 LO2
hurdle task = hurdle task ?

Assessment summary

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a High distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a Distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

Exceptional work

Distinction

75 - 84

Work of a high standard

Credit

65 - 74

Work of a good standard 

Pass

50 - 64

Work of an adequate standard

Fail

0 - 49

Does not meet satisfactory standards

.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Special events as performance (all lectures are online and available, in Canvas, on or before Monday 8am of the same week)--please note there is no live lecture at 8am on Mondays Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Choosing a special event Workshop (2 hr) LO3
Week 02 Performative acts & self presentation (all lectures are online and available, in Canvas, on or before Monday 8am of the same week)--please note there is no live lecture at 8am on Mondays Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Observation Workshop Workshop (2 hr) LO3 LO4
Week 03 Working with Bourdieu (all lectures are online and available on or before Monday 8am of the same week)--please note there is no live lecture at 8am on Mondays Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Writing Workshop Workshop (2 hr) LO3 LO4
Week 04 Bourdieu's Theory of Practice 1 (all lectures are online and available on or before Monday 8am of the same week) Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Bourdieu: key term(s) Workshop (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 05 Bourdieu's Theory of Practice 2 (all lectures are online and available on or before Monday 8am of the same week) Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Writing with Bourdieu Workshop (2 hr) LO2 LO4 LO5
Week 06 Rituals and performance (all lectures are online and available on or before Monday 8am of the same week) Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Rituals and special events Workshop (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 07 Liminal or liminoid/ritual or ritual-like (all lectures are online and available on or before Monday 8am of the same week) Lecture (1 hr) LO1 LO3
Working with Turner Workshop (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 08 Describing Action (all lectures are online and available on or before Monday 8am of the same week) Lecture (1 hr) LO2 LO4 LO5
Writing workshop Workshop (2 hr) LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 09 Writing description (all lectures are online and available on or before Monday 8am of the same week) Lecture (1 hr) LO4 LO5
Theory & Practice--writing between the two-- preparing your Research Proposal Workshop (2 hr) LO4 LO5
Week 10 Research Proposals--group and/or individual consultations Workshop (3 hr) LO4 LO5
Week 11 Research Proposals--individual student consultations to discuss proposals and give feedback. Workshop (3 hr) LO4 LO5
Week 12 Research Proposals--individual student consultations to discuss proposals and give feedback. Workshop (3 hr) LO4 LO5
Week 13 From Research Proposal to Essay Workshop (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5

Attendance and class requirements

  • Attendance: According to Faculty Board Resolutions, students in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences are expected to attend 90% of their classes. If you attend less than 50% of classes, regardless of the reasons, you may be referred to the Examiner’s Board. The Examiner’s Board will decide whether you should pass or fail the unit of study if your attendance falls below this threshold. Please contact your tutor if you are unable to attend the workshop for reasons of illness or misadvanture.
  • All lectures are prerecorded. All lectures will be available on Canvas the Monday of the relevant week. It is expected that all students will attend their workshop having listenened to the pre-recorded lecture for that week. There is no face to face lecture at 8pm on Monday mornings.
  • Workshops are not recorded
  • All Assessments must be attempted to pass the course.
  • Preparation: Students should commit to spend approximately three hours preparation time (listening to lecture reading, studying, homework, reading essays, etc.) for every hour of scheduled instruction (2 hour tutorials=6 hours prep).

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Week 1 In class

Garner, Helen. 2005/2016 In the Wings, Everywhere I Look, Melbourne: Text Publishing, pp. 218-227.

Rossmanith, Kate 2018 Courtroom Appearances, Small Wrongs: How we really say sorry in love, life and law, Melbourne: Hardie Grant, pp. 1-4.


Week 2 Required

Lewis, John Lowell. 2013. Special Events and Everyday Life, in The Anthropology of Cultural Performance, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.1-11

Week 3 Required

Wacquant, Loïc J.D. 1995. ‘Pugs at Work: Bodily Capital and Bodily Labour among Professional Boxers’. Body & Society 1 (1). SAGE Publications: pp. 65–93. doi:10.1177/1357034X95001001005.

Week 4 Required 

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. ‘Structures and the Habitus’. In Outline for a Theory of Practice, p. 72. Cambridge University.

(watch video) Hage, Ghassan. 2016a. ‘Key Thinkers: Ghassan Hage on Pierre Bourdieu Part 1’. Youtube/The Monthly Slow TV. Youtube/The Monthly Slow TV. May 2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vn9daX6Jt4g.

(watch video) Hage, Ghassan. 2016b. ‘Key Thinkers: Ghassan Hage on Pierre Bourdieu Part 2’. Youtube/The Monthly Slow TV. Youtube/The Monthly Slow TV. May 2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfBiw9F_oUw.

Week 5 Required

Maton, Karl. 2008. Habitus. In Pierre Bourdieu: Key Concepts, pp. 49–65. Acumen.

Connell, Catherine and Ashley Mears (2018) Bourdieu and the Body, in The Oxford Handbook of Pierre Bourdieu, Thomas Mevetz and Jeffery J. Sallaz (eds), New York: Oxford University Press 

Week 6 Required

Maxwell, Ian, 2015. My Big Fat Greek Baptism. In Performance and Temporalisation: Time Happens. Grant, McNeilly and Veerapen (ed.) Basingstoke, U.K: Palgrave Macmillan, Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Week 7 Required

Turner, Victor W. 1982. ‘Liminal to Liminoid, in Play, Flow, Ritual: An Essay in Comparative Symbology’. In From Ritual to Theatre: The Human Seriousness of Play, pp. 20–59. New York : Performing Arts Journal Publications.

Week 8

Lewis, John Lowell. 2013. Appropriate chapters of The Anthropology of Cultural Performance, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 

Week 9-13 No set reading. Students are expected to collect and read texts that support their research project, the development of their own bibliography, which will reflect on the nature of and their approach the analysis of their chosen event.

 

 

 

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. understand the contributions of some key thinkers to the development of performance studies
  • LO2. apply methods drawn from the work of these thinkers in order to analyse a variety of performance events
  • LO3. draw on general theories of performance as a conceptual lens for understanding some non-theatrical events in everyday life
  • LO4. demonstrate an embodied understanding of, and response to, key concepts
  • LO5. plan and execute a piece of independent performance research.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Modifications have regularly been made to the delivery of this course in response to student feedback. This year we begin the workshop tutorials in Week 1 giving more time for students to work on their 'hurdle task', the research proposal in preparation for the final task the individual research essay. Readings emphasise the centrality of the practical elements of this course as each student creates their own research project, their own reading list, their own bibliography (with reference to the set readings/theories of course) with guidance from lectures and tutorial/workshops

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.