Student feedback showed many were very happy with the unit, with an overall mean rating of 4.36 out of 5. Many of you highlighted the level and usefulness of the feedback on assessments, especially Assessment 2, and the dedication and responsiveness of the teaching staff as particular strengths of the units. Others mentioned the assessment structure and support and the applicability and relevance of the learning to the real world as strengths. Tutorials were described by some as the best part of the unit, but asynchronous students reported feeling unsupported and disengaged and that the Padlets used for the tutorial exercises were hard to follow. Other areas identified for improvement were the assessment instructions and the balance between how much is expected in an assignment and the length of that assignment, especially for Assessment 2. Students also asked for more time to be spent on goals and objectives, evaluation, and literature search and review. There were also some requests for numerical marks to be published, in addition to grades. We will take this feedback on board in preparing for next year, including by reforming the tutorials for asynchronous students. We are in conversation with the Library about how we can better support students in designing and conducting literature searches and we will look at ways to better communicate the concepts of goals and objectives and evaluations, potentially by providing more examples in the mini lectures. With regards to assessments, we will review the instructions and marking rubrics to improve the clarity and to ensure that the lengths are appropriate. We are also considering how we can share the numerical marks with students without placing undue emphasis on them. This might include publishing the marks a few days to a week after releasing assessment feedback.