Skip to main content
Unit outline_

QBUS3330: Methods of Decision Analysis

Semester 2, 2021 [Normal day] - Remote

This introductory unit on decision analysis addresses the formal methods of decision making. These methods include measuring risk by subjective probabilities; growing decision trees; performing sensitivity analysis; using theoretical probability distributions; simulation of uncertain events; modelling risk attitudes; estimating the value of information; and combining quantitative and qualitative considerations. The primary goal of the unit is to demonstrate how to build models of real business situations that allow the decision maker to better understand the structure of decisions and to automate the decision process by using computer decision tools.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Business Analytics
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
BUSS1020 or DATA1001 or ECMT1010 or ENVX1001 or ENVX1002 or STAT1021 or ((MATH1005 or MATH1015) and MATH1115) or 6 credit points of MATH units which must include MATH1905.
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
QBUS2320 or ECMT2630 or ENGG1850 or CIVL3805
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Simon Loria, simon.loria@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Final exam (Take-home short release) Type D final exam Final exam
Take home short release written exam
50% Formal exam period 2 hours
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Assignment Assignment 1
Written assignment
10% Week 06
Due date: 17 Sep 2021 at 23:59

Closing date: 26 Sep 2021
Up to 1000 word with associated analysis
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
In-semester test (Take-home short release) Type D in-semester exam Mid-semester exam
Take home short release written exam
30% Week 07
Due date: 22 Sep 2021 at 11:00
80 minutes
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Assignment Assignment 2
Simulation modelling and written report
10% Week 12
Due date: 05 Nov 2021 at 23:59

Closing date: 14 Nov 2021
1,500 words with numerical analysis
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Type D final exam = Type D final exam ?
Type D in-semester exam = Type D in-semester exam ?

Assessment summary

  • Assignment 1: This assignment will require answering a series questions based on different business scenarios. The assignment will require students to use “Precision Tree” computer software (provided), as well as draw on theoretical material from lectures. Students will be expected to analyse the data provided, build appropriate models and demonstrate the ability to draw meaningful inferences based on the data and model output. 
  • Assignment 2: The assignment will focus on building a simulation model for a business start-up. The model will require using the simulation software “@Risk” to apply techniques learnt in the unit to the problem at hand. Students will be expected to select the correct models and then write a report providing in-depth data analysis, a discussion of the business implications of their findings and outlining suggested courses of actions for decision makers and other stakeholders.
  • Mid-semester exam: This is an open book exam covering concepts from weeks 1-6 of the unit. Questions could be short answer or extended response and will require students to build decision trees and undertake numerical analysis. Students will be expected to draw out of their analysis relevant business implications for decision makers. The exam can be completed with using the course softare.
  • Final exam: This is an open book exam and will assess all aspects of this unit from weeks 1-13. Questions could be short answer or extended response and will require students to build decision trees and other models as well as undertake numerical analysis. Students will be expected to draw out of their analysis relevant business implications for decision makers. The exam can be completed with using the course softare. 

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the Coursework Policy 2014 (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

Awarded when you demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at an exceptional standard, as defined by grade descriptors or exemplars outlined by your faculty or school. 

Distinction

75 - 84

Awarded when you demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at a very high standard, as defined by grade descriptors or exemplars outlined by your faculty or school.

Credit

65 - 74

Awarded when you demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at a good standard, as defined by grade descriptors or exemplars outlined by your faculty or school.

Pass

50 - 64

Awarded when you demonstrate the learning outcomes for the unit at an acceptable standard, as defined by grade descriptors or exemplars outlined by your faculty or school. 

Fail

0 - 49

When you don’t meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

All assignments submitted after the due date will be penalised at the rate of 5% per day up to 50% in total as per Business School Guidelines

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the AI in Education Canvas site.

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the Learning Hub’s Canvas page.

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The AI in Education Canvas site contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a simple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students, AI in Education includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction to decision analysis Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 02 Decision trees and their application Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 03 Risk profiles and stochastic dominance Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 04 Decision probabilities and Bayes theorem Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 05 Value of information Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 06 Theoretical probability models Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 07 Mid Semester Exam Lecture and tutorial (3 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7
Week 08 Monte Carlo simulation Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 09 Monte Carlo simulation extension Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 10 Utility theory and risk attitudes Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 11 Utility Theory and decision trees Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 12 Prospect theory, biases and heuristics Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  
Week 13 Course and exam review Lecture and tutorial (3 hr)  

Attendance and class requirements

Lecture recordings: All lectures and seminars are recorded and will be available on Canvas for student use. Please note the Business School does not own the system and cannot guarantee that the system will operate or that every class will be recorded. Students should ensure they attend and participate in all classes.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

All readings for this unit can be accessed through the Library eReserve, available on Canvas.

  • Making Hard Decisions, Clemen and Reilly, South-Western, Cengage Learning (3rd Edition).

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. recognise the types of problems that decision analysis can and can’t address
  • LO2. develop the ability to identify the values, objectives, attributes, decisions, uncertainties, consequences, and trade-offs in a real decision problem
  • LO3. apply the concepts learned in this unit (expected value, value of information, risk aversion, and tradeoffs between attributes) to identify good decisions and strategies
  • LO4. demonstrate the ability to represent a decision problem graphically and/or mathematically
  • LO5. develop the skills to determine the optimal decision mathematically
  • LO6. cultivate the aptitude for identifying which parameters have the most impact on the results of an analysis
  • LO7. ripen the expertise of explaining the results of decision analysis to managers and other non-specialists.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

No changes have been made since this unit was last offered.

Disclaimer

The University reserves the right to amend units of study or no longer offer certain units, including where there are low enrolment numbers.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an online glossary.