Skip to main content
Opinion_

What ASEAN can teach the world about surviving a financial crisis

29 September 2015
Having learned from the crisis of 1997 and 2000, ASEAN weathered the financial meltdown of 2008.

Dr Sandra Seno-Alday believes economies around the world can learn valuable lessons from observing how Southeast Asia reacted to the 2008 financial crisis.

The most important lesson is that fostering closer and sustainable international trade matters a lot in developing greater robustness against shocks.
Dr Sandra Seno-Alday, University of Sydney Business School

 

Founded almost 50 years ago, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) was established in order to promote regional political and economic stability. While the initial challenges faced by the region at its inception were largely political, the expansion of ASEAN membership in the 1990s coincided with proactive efforts to promote free trade in the region. These efforts were rewarded by phenomenal economic growth among Southeast Asian countries in the 1990s, thus earning them the moniker of “Asian tigers.” Foreign capital poured into the region in the early part of that decade, with investors scrambling to exploit profit-making opportunities. The regional euphoria was short-lived, however, when everything came crashing down during the 1997 Asian financial crisis.

The 1997 Asian crisis was unique in that its devastating impact was mainly contained within the region. East Asia and the Pacific contracted by 11 percent, while Southeast Asia alone contracted by 30 percent in 1998. In the meantime, the rest of the world continued to grow with hardly a hiccup. In a matter of two years, the region’s fragile recovery was interrupted by the Internet bubble of 2000 which, while more widespread in nature, hit Southeast Asia harder than the rest of the world. But nothing could prepare the world for the massive hit of the global financial crisis of 2008. This crash was deeper than the 1929 crash, and while the speed of recovery has been faster compared to what it was then, the jury is still out regarding the true trajectory of the current recovery: at best, global recovery has been incomplete and uneven across countries and regions.

Oddly enough, the behavior of the Southeast Asian region following the 2008 crisis was the opposite to what it was in 1997 and 2000. After 2008, the rest of the world experienced severe economic recession, whereas Southeast Asia’s regional growth simply slowed but notably did not contract. Studies have shown that the region has clearly become more resilient to shocks over time, and there are important lessons to be gleaned from these research findings.

The most important lesson is that fostering closer and sustainable international trade matters a lot in developing greater robustness against shocks. This is counter-intuitive to the historical response to crises, which typically involves instituting protectionist measures (no matter how subtle they are). Research has shown that protectionist measures tend to linger long after crisis recovery, thus effectively slowing down overall long-term growth. Instead of erecting barriers to trade, Southeast Asian countries pushed ahead and established an even greater number of direct international trade relationships with other countries in the region during the turbulent 1990s. This trend has continued well into the 2000s, resulting in a highly connected and robust regional trade network that has made the region more resilient to shocks and less vulnerable to economic risk over time. There has also been increased participation in international trade among more countries in the region. While some countries, like Myanmar and Laos, still continue to operate at the fringes of the regional trade network, the majority of Southeast Asian countries today actively participate in regional trade to a much greater extent than they ever did in the early 1990s.

Of course, fostering closer international trade implies the development of flexible, internationally-oriented industries. Southeast Asia has always had a strong export orientation, successfully leveraging its reasonably priced, high-quality manpower and other resources to develop export-focused industries. This has allowed the region to take full advantage of the parallel trend among multinational enterprises to offshore, outsource, and establish more globally dispersed value chains.

The ASEAN Economic Community — with its mandate to create a single market by breaking down the barriers to the free movement of goods, services, capital and people — is poised to further foster international business growth, both within the region and the rest of the world.

ASEAN’s leaders must push ahead to fully support the implementation of the mission of the AEC. This will help the region preserve its economic gains and chart its path to further growth. Australia and the rest of the world will do well to proactively reach out to Southeast Asia now, and contribute to building a more connected and thus more resilient global economy.

Dr. Sandra Seno-Alday is a researcher at the Sydney Southeast Asia Centre (SSEAC) and a Lecturer of International Business at the University of Sydney Business School. First published in The Diplomat 28 September 2015.

 

Sally Sitou

Media and PR Adviser (International)
Address
  • Level 2 Services Building G12

Related articles

23 June 2016

'Jobs and growth' focus ignores society’s most vulnerable, warns pre-election audit

Ahead of the Federal Election, a group of leading academics have released a new audit questioning what the Coalition, the Australian Labor Party (ALP) and the Australian Greens are doing to address poverty in Australia and beyond.

21 June 2016

University welcomes new Sydney School of Entrepreneurship

The University of Sydney has welcomed the NSW Government's $25 million pledge to create the Sydney School of Entrepreneurship as a new collaborative venture in the higher education sector. 

21 June 2016

A vote for Brexit means a wounded David Cameron and a calamitous blow to Europe

Behind the parochial media focus on the political manoeuvring within a divided Conservative Party, national decisions don't get much more important than the UK's referendum on its EU membership, writes Nick Rowley.

28 June 2016

The voter paradox

Whatever the outcome of this election, hung parliaments and minority governments will increasingly be a feature of the Australian political landscape, writes Dr Peter Chen.

07 December 2016

App to change the way you retire

Do you need to save more money for retirement? There may soon be an app for that, thanks to MBA graduate Carla Harris and her team.

05 December 2016

Infrastructure: learning lessons from superannuation

Superannuation and infrastructure have a lot in common, and so they should: they represent two sides of the same coin. 

17 October 2016

On-campus entrepreneur program INCUBATE to double in size

The University of Sydney will provide significant financial support for on-campus startup accelerator INCUBATE, to help double its size over the next five years.

05 October 2016

Australia leads the United States in women at work

Australia has caught up to - and on some measures surpassed - the United States in female labour force participation and in relation to women's representation in senior and strategic organisational roles, according to new report from the United States Studies Centre. 

12 July 2016

Long distance links inspire innovation

Working with Professor Yasuyuki Todo (Waseda University) and Dr Hiroyasu Inoue (Hyogo University), Dr Petr Matous from the University of Sydney’s Faculty of Engineering and IT found that supply chains can work as important channels for the flow of information, innovation, and productivity between individual firms.

07 July 2016

Abercrombie building heralds new era for business education in Asia Pacific

The Business School’s new state-of-the-art $250 million home is predicted to reshape the way students are equipped to lead the Asia–Pacific region in the 21st century.