Skip to main content
News_

Consumers cautioned over mental health apps

8 May 2017
Innovation doesn’t always improve health outcomes

Australia is a leader in digital mental health technologies; this week experts will gather at the University of Sydney to forge a path for unbiased, safe and quality mental health apps.

An illustration of a girl using a mental health app and feeling lots of different emotions

Finding peace of mind: Ensuring integrity and countering bias in mental health apps’ is the topic of this year’s Bias and Research Integrity Node Symposium, to be hosted by the University’s Charles Perkins Centre on Tuesday 9 May.

Bringing together mental health clinicians, policy experts, researchers working in digital health and consumer advocates, the symposium will discuss what happens when hype outpaces the evidence and whether innovation always leads to improved health.

Project node leader Professor Lisa Bero, from the University’s Charles Perkins Centre and Faculty of Pharmacy explained, “Apps tend to be highly commercialised, yet biases resulting from app sponsorship or promotion are an area that has remained relatively unexplored.”

The symposium serves as the launch of 'Finding Peace of Mind', a project funded by the Australian Communications Consumer Action Network (ACCAN), the peak body for consumer representation in the telecommunications industry. Led by Dr Quinn Grundy, this project analysed prominent mental health apps available to Australian consumers and the existing laws and policies that regulate them.

It is difficult for consumers to identify safe and quality mental health apps, yet governments are doing little to regulate this market.
Dr Quinn Grundy

“There is a great deal of optimism surrounding mental health apps and their potential to deliver tailored, accessible, cost-effective mental health services,” Dr Grundy, a postdoctoral research fellow in the Faculty of Pharmacy based at the Charles Perkins Centre, said.

“However, less attention has been given to possible harms to consumers that could be related to health, privacy, finances and society as a whole.

“Mental health apps routinely failed to make privacy assurances, but still collected consumers’ personal information,” Dr Grundy added.

“Developers often claimed that consumers could easily and rapidly improve their mental health by using the apps. However, these same apps frequently made disclaimers that the app’s advice should not be followed."

Jazmin, a PhD Candidate, agrees, having used an app that promoted itself as being able to help lesson anxiety.

“It was an especially busy period for me with study as well as trying to establish a startup, and I felt quite stressed, " she said.

“At first I found the meditations useful, particularly at night. But then the requirement for daily reporting started to get annoying." 

"I realised that when I rated myself as feeling down, that actually compounded those feelings – I ended up feeling worse. So I gave it up.”
Jazmin

At the symposium, experts will discuss solutions to ensure the integrity of mental health apps and counter commercial biases.

Speakers include Professor Annemarie Jutel, from the Victoria University of Wellington; Professor Helen Christensen, Director and Chief Scientist, Black Dog Institute; and Professor Jon Jureidini, the Director of the University of Adelaide’s Critical and Ethical Mental Health Research Unit.

The conference is open to the public.