Policing Australian Popular Music

Criminalisation, Resistance, Redemption: A study of the relationship between policing and popular music in Australia

This interdisciplinary project is the first comprehensive study of the relationship between policing and popular music in Australia. It explores how forms of popular music have been criminalised, and the ways musicians and musical communities voice resistance to police and state powers.

About the project

The Australian colonial nation state has always had a particular relationship to crime, with sovereign land stolen, and First Nations people policed, in order to build a penal colony based on punishment and redemption. Music has been inextricably involved with this history, with popular music holding complex associations with both state construed criminality and community resistance. Australia's unofficial national anthem, Waltzing Matilda, is about a sheep thief who suicides rather than be taken by troopers; Aboriginal artists have historically been prevented from playing specific types of music. In the 1990s one of Australia's most popular performers Nick Cave made his name singing murder ballads.

The policing of music is not just an historical issue with intensified drug searches of dance parties and police use of various crime prevention orders against drill rap groups often playing out along race-based, ethnic, and cultural lines. Moreover, we have seen feminist singer-songwriters voice support for the #metoo movement, and First Nations hip-hop artists such as Dobby and BARKAA resist state power though the Black Lives Matter lens with songs like I can't breathe.

However, at the same time as attracting censure, rap music is also seen as a legitimate resource for redemption. Rap workshops and ‘hip hop therapy’ are commonly deployed in state institutions for incarcerated or ‘at-risk’ youth. This project uncovers, compiles and analyses the processes by which popular music is policed and explores the power of music to resist policing or regulation, and to initiate positive social change. 

Sydney Institute of Criminology

Learn more

Research questions to be addressed

  1. What are the historical and contemporary dynamics of popular music and musicians’ encounters with police and state power? 
  2. What role does popular music play in group cohesion, shared beliefs, and in group interactions with police and authorities? 
  3. How do sonorities, lyrics, atmospheres of performance venues, and other aspects of popular music expression construct and reflect group interactions with police and authorities? 
  4. In what ways can popular music and its performance articulate social tensions between communities, policing, and policy to facilitate healing, redemption, reconciliation, and social change? 

Project team

Professor Murray Lee, Sydney Law School, The University of Sydney

Dr Toby Martin, Sydney Conservatorium of Music, The University of Sydney

Professor Jioji RavuloSydney School of Education and Social Work, The University of Sydney

Dr Alexis Kallio, Queensland Conservatorium, Griffith University

Related publications

Lee, M. Ravulo, J. Martin, T. (2023). "No, music doesn’t cause crime – not even ‘drill rap'", The Conversation

Kallio, A.A. (2023). Problematising the potentials of music programs to address Australia’s youth justice policy problemsMusic Education Research, 25:4, 458-467 

Lee, M., Martin, T., Ravulo, J., Simandjuntak, R. (2022). [Dr]illing in the name of: the criminalisation of Sydney drill group ONEFOURCurrent Issues in Criminal Justice, 34(4), 339-359. 

Lee, M. (2022). This Is Not a Drill: Towards a Sonic and Sensorial MusicriminologyCrime, Media, Culture: An International Journal, 18(3), 446-465. 

Martin, T. (2019). Dougie Young and political resistance in early Aboriginal country musicPopular Music, 38(3), 538-559. 

Martin, T. (2019). Historical silences, musical noise: Slim Dusty, country music and Aboriginal historyPopular Music History, 12(2), 215-